Another forward.

Rumor Mill News Agents Forum The Incredible 9-11 Evidence Posted By: faction3
Date: Sunday, 30 March 2003, 3:14 a.m. In Response To: <A HREF="http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/config.pl?read=30048">CALLS WERE ALSO 
APPARENTLY SCRIPTED</A> (Jedediah_Smith) 
> "The Incredible 9-11 Evidence 
> We've All been Overlooking" -Leonard Spencer In trying to piece together 
> what really happened on September 11, a lot of work has been done — much of 
> it useful and interesting — into those 'hijacked' flights for which the 
> publicly-available evidence is sketchy and contradictory. There are web 
> sites for instance wholly dedicated to investigating the true fate of 
> Flight 93 and others that attempt to get a clearer idea of what really 
> happened at the Pentagon. Both these incidents however are characterised by 
> a pronounced absence of substantive material evidence and it is this, I 
> suppose, that raises our suspicions and curiosity. 
> There is one flight however that has received insufficient attention and 
> this is American Airlines Flight 11, the plane that allegedly crashed into 
> WTC1, the North Tower. It was the first of the terrorist attacks that day. 
> It has been a big mistake not to subject this flight to the same kind of 
> scrutiny as the others because, unlike the others, a very good and 
> important piece of documentary evidence of this flight exists in the public 
> domain. This is the so-called 'Fireman's Video' and we really haven't 
> looked at it closely enough. It really does deserve a second look. The 
> story of the 'Fireman's Video' is well known. Two French filmmakers, the 
> Naudet Brothers, were in New York on September 11 making a documentary 
> about the New York Fire Service. The footage shows that, while filming in 
> Canal Street, firemen and crew are distracted by a plane flying low 
> overhead. The camera operator instinctively turns his camera towards the 
> North Tower and, for little more than a second or so, we get a clear view 
> of the plane crashing into the tower. It is a precious, priceless second. 
> It is the one-second of video that really makes the sinister Bush junta 
> nervous. It really gives them nightmares. They really didn't want a 
> professional cameraman to catch that moment on broadcast-quality tape. If 
> you've got it on tape I strongly suggest you take another look at it, with 
> the pause and frame-forward buttons at the ready. If you don't have it 
> taped you can purchase the documentary in which it appears on video and 
> DVD. It's called simply '9/11'. When seen at full speed, you might first of 
> all think that there isn't a great deal to see. There's half a second or so 
> when we see the plane flying through the air then it smashes into the 
> tower, creating an explosion and leaving a great gash across the building. 
> Notice though that immediately before it hits the building the plane emits 
> a brief, bright flash. Notice too that the scar it leaves on the building 
> is rather larger than seems appropriate for the size of the aircraft. Now 
> pause the sequence at the beginning and advance it frame by frame. Firstly, 
> look at the plane. Does that look like a Boeing jet to you? Is its wingspan 
> wide enough? Does it have engines attached to its wings? These however are 
> but minor details compared with what comes next. Watch carefully what 
> happens as the plane approaches and crashes into the tower. I leave you to 
> come to your own conclusions about what you see (watch it over and over 
> again, backwards and forwards), but I'll tell you what I see. Immediately 
> before the plane strikes it fires a missile that blows a hole in the 
> building's façade. This is the cause of that brief flash. The plane then 
> begins to disappear neatly into this hole, leaving no wing impressions. (A 
> plane disappearing into a hole? Where have I heard that before; wasn't 
> there something about a plane at the Pentagon?) Just before it disappears 
> however it fires two more missiles from somewhere near its tail. One goes 
> to the left, one to the right (and up a bit) and it is the blast holes from 
> these three separate missiles that form the great gash across the building. 
> There's more. Keep an eye on the adjacent east side of the building, which 
> is also visible. See how, a few frames into the explosion, a white jet of 
> smoke erupts out of the east side at the same level as the plane. The jet 
> comes straight out of the wall at right angles to it, not angled in 
> accordance with the trajectory of the plane. Also it's just white smoke and 
> dust, no orange flames or anything like that. It is clearly a bomb going 
> off, creating the gash that appears on the east wall. I know what I am 
> describing sounds incredible. I suggest only that you look at the footage 
> yourself and come to your own conclusions about what you see. The plane 
> that hit the North Tower was not American Airlines Flight 11. It was not a 
> Boeing 767. It was a custom-built military plane carrying three missiles 
> that created the impression of a plane crash without leaving any wreckage. 
> In order for it precisely to strike the correct part of the tower (in line 
> with the bomb already planted in the east wall) it must have been flown 
> remotely using cruise navigation. I believe a similar plane was used to 
> strike the Pentagon. The 'Conspiracy Theorists' have got it dead right this 
> time. The true Flights 11, 175, 77 and 93 were indeed substituted with 
> other planes when the transponders were switched off. Someone hijacked the 
> hijackers to make sure the job was done properly. The 'Fireman's Video' is 
> Bush's true smoking gun. It is in the public domain and it is even 
> available on DVD. It is probably sitting in the video shelves of thousands 
> and thousands of homes across the world. It is vitally important that the 
> American people see this video frame by frame so they can make their own 
> minds up about what really happened on September 11. There has been a 
> silent coup in America but few have noticed yet. The Bush Administration is 
> clearly very sinister indeed and God only knows what it has in store for us 
> next. There is a clue though in the things of which it accuses Saddam 
> Hussein: building and using weapons of mass destruction (nuclear and 
> biological) and killing his own people. When Bush describes Saddam he is 
> describing himself. We have entered the Age of the Conjurer and it is going 
> to be a tricky time. The 9-11 stunt was a huge magic trick and we all 
> bought it at first. Magicians can be very convincing. You have to look very 
> hard to see the trick and not be fooled. On this occasion slow motion 
> exposes the sleight of hand, but remember how the magician works: he can 
> make almost anything seem real if he can make his audience look in the 
> wrong place at crucial moments. Only the American people can now stop the 
> imminent slaughter and the imposition of a global fascist police state, but 
> they are currently sleepwalking into their own enslavement. It may already 
> be too late. But maybe if enough Americans get out their videos and their 
> remote controls (pardon the pun) and take a long hard look at that 
> remarkable footage of that plane hitting the North Tower, then an armed and 
> outraged middle America might just pull it off. Hah! Just in is this 
> priceless piece of evidence — the Fireman's Video in QuickTime, good enough 
> to see the action and with frame forward and backward capacity too! More 
> Incredible Evidence 
> It concerns Flight 175, the jet which hit WTC2, the South Tower. If you 
> have copies of the various shots of Flight 175 hitting WTC2 they're worth 
> looking at again. In particular there's one bit of footage of this incident 
> where the camera is facing the south side of WTC2, the side that took the 
> impact. In this footage you can see the plane bank sharply seconds before 
> impact and you can also see it actually penetrate the building. If you 
> pause the tape just before it strikes you can see that the plane is 
> carrying an anomalous device on its right wing, very close to the fuselage. 
> It almost looks like a third engine and is connected by tubing to the tail 
> section. The video (use your pause and frame forward buttons again) shows 
> that, just as the plane's nose strikes the building this device fires a jet 
> of flames, a split-second before the explosion starts. I wonder what this 
> device can be? The dark stripe down the side is not part of the paintwork 
> (check out the United Airlines livery) but the shadow of the device and its 
> pipe work. In the last second or two the plane banks so much to the left 
> that the sun (to the right of the picture) catches the plane's underside 
> and the mystery objects cast shadows. Start perhaps with the silvery 'lump' 
> tucked, so to speak, in the plane's right 'armpit'. What is that? Note too 
> that if you look closely, what I call the nozzle is not part of the plane's 
> own outline but is separate from it. And on the video this nozzle can be 
> seen firing a jet of flame, just before it penetrates the building. It's 
> interesting to note that the two plane crashes into the two towers were 
> very different from one another. The first crash, seen in the Fireman's 
> Video, was a rather modest affair. After the initial explosion the smoke 
> and flames die down quickly and such flames as there are are reddish in 
> color. The second plane on the other hand causes a vast spectacular yellow 
> fireball and the resultant fire in the building is much more extensive and 
> intense than that caused by the first. Given that both planes were supposed 
> to be 767s, were both flying from Boston to the West coast and had both 
> been in the air for around 45 minutes before they crashed, this is rather 
> strange because they should have both been carrying roughly the same amount 
> of fuel. As the Fireman's Video shows, the first plane was not a 767 and it 
> fired missiles to create most of the damage. The rather small fireball and 
> fire was probably due to the fact that it had very little fuel on board. 
> The second plane doesn't fire missiles (well, the world's media was in 
> place by then) but the explosion it creates is clearly very fuel-rich 
> indeed. There are several eyewitness reports that mention the smell of fuel 
> in the air after this plane crashes. I suspect that this plane was 
> absolutely full of fuel, a flying fuel-tank, hence the mighty fireball. So 
> the object on the right wing is probably an ignition device, triggered just 
> as the plane strikes, to ensure that the fuel explodes as required. When 
> Flight 175 took off from Boston at 8:13 a.m. it is rather unlikely that 
> there was such an ignition device attached to the plane, since it would 
> surely have been visible to anyone observing its departure. Therefore the 
> plane which hit the South Tower was not the plane which took off from 
> Boston. This point has been in more detail elsewhere. The terrorist attacks 
> on 9-11 are unique in at least one regard. As far as I can tell they are 
> the only terrorist incidents to have been played out right under the noses 
> of a waiting media. I believe this was no accident. The incidents were 
> timed and sequenced to ensure that this was the case. The first crash 
> (which we were most definitely not meant to see) brought the media to the 
> WTC and ensured plenty of cameras were trained on the towers in time for 
> the next crash around 15 minutes later. So we all see the second crash in 
> all its glory, from every conceivable angle. Spectacular isn't it? And of 
> course even more cameras were around by the time the towers magnificently 
> and apocalyptically collapsed an hour later. I believe that the cinematic 
> brilliance of these shots was a major objective of the overall operation. 
> Remember how we were practically force-fed these images for two whole days, 
> so everyone saw them hundreds of times? This is invaluable propaganda and 
> brain-washing. It's important to remember that if there's one thing that 
> Americans are really better at doing than anyone else on the planet it's 
> making movies. Big, spectacular movies.They understand better than anyone 
> the immense potential of the moving image to inform, entertain and suggest. 
> Above all they know how to manipulate and guide our emotions through film. 
> They use this knowledge and skill whenever they can and I believe 9-11 is 
> only the most recent instance. As in the case of Flight 11, video footage 
> of Flight 175 again reveals the hand of the magician and the movie maker. 
> It seems to me that close examination of these two pieces of video proves 
> beyond all reasonable doubt that 9-11 was a sophisticated military 
> operation for which only the US itself could be responsible. The evidence 
> is irrefutable and would stand up in a court of law. While Bush is in power 
> there will be no such court case. What the hell do we do now? #### Note: 
> Graphics, Video, & Bibliography in Link 
> <A HREF="http://www.serendipity.li/wot/aa11.htm">http://www.serendipity.li/wot/aa11.htm</A> 
> =========== 
> "The World Trade Center Demolition 
> and the So-Called War on Terrorism" Why of course the people don't want war 
> ... But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the 
> policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether 
> it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a 
> communist dictatorship ... Voice or no voice, the people can always be 
> brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is 
> to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack 
> of patriotism and exposing the country to danger." — Hermann Goering, Nazi 
> leader, at the Nuremberg Trials after World War II Introduction 
> The Official Story: The Twin Towers 
> The Official Story: The Pentagon 
> What Actually Happened 
> Evidence for Explosives in the Twin Towers 
> Did the Twin Towers Collapse on Demand? 
> The Perpetrators 
> The "War on Terrorism" 
> Wars for Oil 
> The Demise of Liberty 
> The U.S.A: a Terrorist State 
> The Corruption of the Republic 
> Questions About the Events of September 11th 
> The American Drive for World Domination 
> <A HREF="http://www.serendipity.li/wtc.html#what_actually_happened_2">http://www.serendipity.li/wtc.html#what_actually_happened_2</A> 
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/CGI/wa.exe?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]

To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/gambia-l.html

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~