Basiru,
Why don't you let Halifa answer the pending questions first before judging
anything? What "petty politics" is involved in the questions being raised.
Where is the "intellectual dishonesty?"
I'm not a public figure. Neither is Hamjatta as far as I can tell. I don't
know the gentleman. Never even heard of him. I've never said I have the
solutions to our country's problem. I have some ideas, but I haven't made it
my business to tell the country how to do things. Halifa has. I, (and many
Gambians apparently,) have issues with the positions he's taken in the cases
in question. He is yet to explain any of them satisfactorily. So, instead of
butting in and making these ignorant comments intermittently, why don't YOU
shut up and let Halifa the politician answer citizens' questions. If you're
not so prejudiced, you'd have realized by now that several things Halifa has
claimed just don't add up!
In any case, your opinion doesn't mean SHIT in this debate. You can follow
it, or you can DROP DEAD! It doesn't make one difference.
Saul.
PS. Just as an advice: Always review your writing before posting it online.
It's hard to understand you when you keep violating BASIC grammatical rules.
You jumble ideas; your sentences run into each other, etc. You totally
confuse me. There's an Elementary book called "Commas and Stops." Please get
something like that! There's no point in having any debate/argument when
people have to guess what you're saying half the time. Sorry, I have to
break this news to you.
Saul.
>From: Basiru Ndow <[log in to unmask]>
>Reply-To: [log in to unmask]
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Question for Hamjatta & Saul
>Date: Fri, 24 Dec 1999 00:52:20 -0600
>
>Saul and Hamjatta,
> The debate is indeed very interesting, and now that the dust is about to
> settle and the jurrors(list members ) are now digesting the articles
>and some will render a very honest verdict.However the 1997
>constitution is the target of many paper critics like you, ofcourse no
>one denies the fact that it contains many flaws that only protects the
>members of the APRC just like 1970 constitution. My only question is
>what would you done during the transition period given the fact that
>we either have to accept the 1997 constitution as it is or reject it
>and risk surviving under a roof of unquestionable degrees.. you have
>been very critical of Halipha's role during the transition and you are
>yet to let us know what you would have done or are going to do to help
>change the situation, Africa has wasted too much time on this kind of
>petty politics, intellectual dishonesty is a crime and history will
>be the judge.. Give credit to those who sacrifice their time, knowledge
>and energy for a better Gambia and please shut up if you cannot give
>anything.. Many are waiting for your alternative solution, and please
>let's not try to build a mountain out of a molehill..
>
>Happy Ramadan..
>
>Thanxxxxx
>
>Bass Ndow
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L
>Web interface at: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/gambia-l.html
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L
Web interface at: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/gambia-l.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
