GAMBIA-L Archives

The Gambia and Related Issues Mailing List

GAMBIA-L@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Haruna Darbo <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The Gambia and related-issues mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 2 Nov 2007 20:44:42 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (192 lines)
 
Kabir,
 
Thanx for sharing. I remembered  about a year ago, our friend and colleague 
Dave Manneh of Posten fame introduced  us to this idea of Mo Ibrahim "The 
Philanthroper for Good governance". My advice  to Mo then is the exact same advice 
I see Issa shares. Perhaps not for  exactly the same reasons but close. Like 
Issa, I think Mo's millions are  better spent in his home country first. Allah 
knows they need it. Without even  querying the value of the prize or the 
parameters of review, Mo is  better advised to look home. I am pleased Issa holds 
the same  view.
 

"Mr. Mo Ibrahim: you have made  millions of dollars from the sweat and blood 
of the African people. If you want  to return a few million to the people, 
build schools, dispensaries, and water  wells in the south of your own country 
rather than giving them to Chisasanos of  this world. Do not add insult to 
injury by robbing (poor) Peter to pay (rich)  Paul." Issa Shivji

 
Haroun Masoud. MQDT Darbo. AL  Khairawan. 
 
 
In a message dated 11/2/2007 6:27:35 A.M. Mountain Daylight Time,  
[log in to unmask] writes:

Features
The Mo Ibrahim Prize: Robbing Peter to pay Paul
Issa  Shivji (2007-11-01)
"Mo Ibrahim's prize for a retired African president  which was awarded to 
Joachim Chissano of Mozambique was in my view an insult  to the African people." 
Issa Shivji raises a number of questions around the  award such as how and 
what is "good governance" and why is it only applied to  Africa? And most 
importantly "for which and whose democracy they are getting a  prize".


First, it is belittling African people. Dictators and  undemocratic rulers 
exist all over the world, including the West which has  arrogated to itself the 
right to judge others as "good man" or punish them for  being dictators 
(Saddam Hussein). 

So, when our leaders receive prizes  for their democratic achievements we 
should ask ourselves for which and whose  democracy they are getting a prize.

Punishment is to deter; often to  take revenge. Reward is to encourage. 
Rewards can also be a recognition for  outstanding, usually, individual 
achievements. Which acts are liable to  punishment and which are rewarded depends on the 
dominant values of society.  These can differ from society to society and from 
time to time within same  society. Issues of democracy and dictatorship, of 
war and peace, of governance  and state administration, do not fall within the 
realm of a system of  punishment and rewards.

Of course, victorious powers recognise their  war heroes and vanquished bury 
their martyrs with honour. But then heroes of  the victor are mercenaries for 
the vanquished and the martyrs of the  vanquished may be terrorists for the 
victor. In other words, the issues of war  and peace are contentious issues and 
can only be understood in their  historical and social context. And so are the 
issues of democracy and  dictatorship. Therefore, it is naïve, if not 
mischievous, to award a person -  moreover with a cash prize - for bringing peace or 
democracy to his country.  

It is even worse to cite "good governance" as an achievement for  awarding an 
individual president of a country. What is "good governance"? Who  determines 
what is good and bad governance? What yardsticks are applied? And  why are 
these yardsticks applied only to Africa? Why doesn't any one award a  Norwegian 
prime minister for good governance or include "good governance"  
conditionality to lend Mr. Bush assistance or fund Martin Athissari to advise  Bush on good 
governance? (Remember Martin Athissari, funded by the World Bank,  came to 
Tanzania to advise President Mkapa on good governance.) 

The  point about these rhetorical questions should be obvious. Mo Ibrahim's 
prize  for a retired African president which was awarded to Joachim Chissano of 
 Mozambique was in my view an insult to the African people. First, it is  
belittling African people. Dictators and undemocratic rulers exist all over  the 
world, including the West which has arrogated to itself the right to judge  
others as "good man" or punish them for being dictators (Saddam Hussein).  

Despots and dictators are not a monopoly of Africa. African people,  like 
other people elsewhere, have always struggled against them. If they have  
attained some success in these struggles, it is their collective achievement.  Their 
success is not due to particular qualities of any single leader. Good  leaders 
are as much a product of our societies as are the bad ones. It is for  the 
people to decide who is a good or a bad leader and how to award a good one  and 
punish a bad one. I certainly cannot imagine Mozambicans (or any African  
people for that matter) awarding a 5-million dollar prize to Mr. Chissano.  First 
because Chissano's goodness itself is, I am sure, a contentious issue in  
Mozambique. Secondly, Mozambican people, if at all, would have awarded their  
leader by including him in a list of honour or putting his picture on a postal  
stamp. And if they had 5 million dollars to spare, they would have probably  
built secondary schools to produce future good leaders rather than give it  away 
to Chissano to "live a better life" and invest in business (which is what  
Chissano said in a BBC interview he would use the money for.) 

The  worst disappointment in the prize saga has been its uncritical and 
unqualified  celebration by scribes and even academics and intellectuals. Since 
this prize  to a retired president was for stepping down from power or "good 
governance'  or bringing democracy and peace to his country, it was expected that 
analysts  would go beyond the superficial and the obvious to a deeper 
understanding and  explanation of issues of war and peace and democracy and 
dictatorships in  Africa. Before we celebrate, we must understand what it is that we are 
 celebrating. Before we applaud this prize to Chissano we must understand the 
 history, politics and forces which underpinned war and peace in Mozambique.  

The people of Africa have been involved in a long struggle against war  and 
for peace and democracy and the struggle continues. In this struggle, they  are 
pitted against not only their own immediate rulers but also against the  
erstwhile colonial and imperialist powers supporting them. Our dictators were  not 
simply made in Kinshasa (Mobutu) or Central African Republic (Bokassa) or  
Entebbe (Idi Amin) but also in Washington or Paris or London and Tel Aviv. The  
vicious war in Mozambique was not simply waged by RENAMO but fully supported  
and instigated by apartheid South Africa backed by the US and western powers.  
Apartheid South Africa also claimed the life of the liberation leader Samora  
Machel and his leading comrades.

Chissano took over from Samora and  under the tutelage of Washington steered 
the neo-liberal course. It is under  this new direction that the former 
freedom fighters like Chissano's family and  Gebuza and others (with some honourable 
exceptions) began accumulating wealth  and became businessmen. Chissano's son 
Nyimpine, a businessman, was implicated  in the murder of a journalist Carlos 
Cardoso who was investigating the  fraudulent disappearance of 14 million 
dollars from the Commercial Bank of  Mozambique in 1996. The story of wealth 
accumulation by political leaders in  Mozambique is not that different from what 
we have been witnessing and  debating in Tanzania. It is even on a larger 
scale. In Tanzania Mwalimu's  ghost has had greater restraining power on vultures 
of wealth than Samora's in  Mozambique. 

As with economics, so with politics. The opening up of  space after one-party 
authoritarianism did not just come about on a silver  platter. People in 
Tanzania, Mozambique and the rest of Africa struggled for  it. But as usual the 
rulers and their imperialist backers pre-empted the  struggle for real democracy 
by imposing their own truncated version of  neo-liberal democracy 

So, when our leaders receive prizes for their  democratic achievements we 
should ask ourselves for which and whose democracy  they are getting a prize. Are 
they getting the prize for a neo-liberal  democracy under which the World 
Bank and "development partners" (read:  developed predators!) impose 
privatization of national assets and resources;  under which their diplomats pressurize 
our ministers and governments to sign  utterly one-sided contracts with the 
likes of golden sharks; under which the  parliament is literally ordered to pass 
laws which have been drafted by their  consultants like the Mining Act, under 
which our political leaders in a  free-for-all pandemonium overnight become 
"wajasiria mali" and bankers and big  miners? Is this the democracy for which the 
peasants, workers, youth, and  wamachinga fought? In short, before 
celebrating let us ask ourselves what are  we celebrating and whose music we are dancing 
to. 

Without such  critical understanding, I am afraid, we can end up celebrating 
and  legitimizing the shaming and ridiculing of the democratic struggles and  
achievements of our people. 

Mr. Mo Ibrahim: you have made millions of  dollars from the sweat and blood 
of the African people. If you want to return  a few million to the people, 
build schools, dispensaries, and water wells in  the south of your own country 
rather than giving them to Chisasanos of this  world. Do not add insult to injury 
by robbing (poor) Peter to pay (rich) Paul.  


© Issa Shivji is one of Africa's most radical and original  thinkers and has 
written frequently for Pambazuka News. He is the author of  several books, 
including the seminal Concept of Human Rights in Africa (1989)  and, more 
recently, Let the People Speak: Tanzania down the road to  neoliberalism (2006).

* Please send comments to [log in to unmask] or  comment online at  
www.pambazuka.org

¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
To  unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L 
Web  interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html

To  Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to:  
http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the  List Management, please send an e-mail  to:
[log in to unmask]
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤


 



************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com

¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html

To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤

ATOM RSS1 RSS2