GAMBIA-L Archives

The Gambia and Related Issues Mailing List

GAMBIA-L@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
chernob jallow <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The Gambia and related-issues mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 28 Dec 1999 08:22:20 PST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (283 lines)
Bamba,
To presume is to suppose something to be true without certainty. I did not
think that you've already believed Ebou Jallow's revealations. No where did
I qualify that. Hence the misunderstanding.

Thanks for the comment, compelling me to clarify. Bye.

Cherno Baba Jallow
Detroit, MI

>From: Bamba Laye <[log in to unmask]>
>Reply-To: Bamba Laye <[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: Ebou Jallows' revelations
>Date: Mon, 27 Dec 1999 09:33:08 -0600
>
>Cherno,
>Thanks for the effort in clarifying. Mr. Manneh has said most of what I was
>going to write here, but one thing I would like to get out of the way is
>your presumption of my position in the whole affair:
>"Presumably, you've already made up your mind that Jallow's revealations
>are
>true or are verifiable by his own narration of events. "
>     Cherno, sorry if I sound blunt, but it is damned ludicrous for you to
>think that I believe Ebous' story just because I challenged Observers'
>decision not to publish it!
>No wonder you came up with that decision. Is this how you view critics as a
>competent professional journalists? When I first read Ebon writings, I had
>my reservations like many have said in this forum, he was part of them. Why
>did he wait so long?  So, when you mentioned that he did indeed write a
>similar story few years earlier, I had to reposition my thoughts about the
>issue, not necessarily accept the story as the truth. What I am trying
>emphasize is that the people have the right to read his side of the story
>at a time when they are dying to know, whether they will buy it or not
>should be left for them to decide.
>     I may not be familiar with journalistic ethics but I do believe that
>if  a letter is sent to a paper about an issue that had whole country at
>it's laurels and the source of the letter can be substantiated as you did,
>I do not see why you can't get away with publishing such a letter by
>clearly quoting the source if you have pledged to serve the people. Of
>course  I am well aware of the menace you could have gone through by
>publishing such a letter, but the truth is, you did write more
>controversial issues at the time and you survived it!
>
>Perhaps we should start scrutinizing the role of the press during the
>transition period as some of us are doing with PDOIS. I bet a lot of
>anomalies would be unfolded.
>
>Stay safe my brother.
>
>Abdoulie A. Jallow
>
>"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter".
>  - Dr. M. L. King Jr.
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: Dave Manneh <[log in to unmask]>
>     To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
>     Date: Monday, December 27, 1999 6:42 AM
>     Subject: Re: Ebou Jallows' revelations
>
>
>     Mr Cherno Jallow,
>         You wrote:-
>     <<And we couldn't either at the time. Better still, Jallow's
>allegations are one-sided,
>     a narration of events, he indicated to have been spoon-fed to him by
>those he
>     alleged to have "killed" Koro.>>
>         If Ebou's allegation/revelations are so ridiculous, and
>unsubstantiable rubbish,
>     why then did the Jammeh regime seemed it fitting to ban VoiceOut?
>
>     I am no journalist, and have no knowledge of the ethics of this very
>important  and
>     noble profession, but I was, and still am with the notion that if a
>story is printed in
>     paper/media, and is then refuted by one party or another, then what
>that party has
>     to do is to counter the claim with proof, in other word prove it's
>false.
>
>     Why were the involved parties not given these opportunities in this
>case?
>
>     Why didn't you contact the "other party" and challenge them to refute
>Ebou's
>     allegations/revelations?
>
>     Please forgive me here, if am out of my depths here, as I stated
>earlier on
>     am not much versed in journalistic ethics and practices? But one thing
>which
>     comes out crystal clear to me is that your paper's decision not to
>print
>     "the one-sided story" is truly "amazing" to say the least.
>     It's a bit mind-buggling, in'it?
>
>     All the best
>     Mr Manneh
>     chernob jallow wrote:
>
>         Bamba,
>         I agree with your feelings. It's sad that Ebou Jallow's
>allegations couldn't
>         get through to the Ceesay family or the Gambian people. We all
>would have
>         loved to paste his allegations on our newspapers, but provided
>they could be
>         substantiated by him or by us, in our own investigations. Jallow
>was already
>         in the US;there was no way he could be sought to confirm in a
>court of law,
>         the validity of his allegations. And we couldn't either at the
>time. Better
>         still, Jallow's allegations are one-sided, a narration of events,
>he
>         indicated to have been spoon-fed to him by those he alleged to
>have "killed"
>         Koro. Yes, it would have been nice to the Ceesay family or the
>Gambian
>         public, to have been told the "circumstances surrounding Koro's
>death"
>         according to Ebou Jallow. But what if Jallow's allegations turned
>out false?
>
>         Presumably, you've already made up your mind that Jallow's
>revealations are
>         true or are verifiable by his own narration of events. Personally,
>I think
>         that in as much as Jallow's allegations do give a glint of
>information from
>         within, about Koro's death, they, however, should be viewed
>carefully. They
>         may be true or false, but only a competent court of law or a
>commission of
>         inquiry can authenticate them. And those he alleges to have
>"killed" Koro
>         are "innocent" until proven guilty in a court of law or by a
>competent
>         Coroner's inquest. So to publish his allegations, which were
>one-sided,
>         unsubstantiated, unverifiable at the time, would have been legally
>costly,
>         if not, dangerous to a newspaper's existence at the time.
>
>         Recently, Jallow used the "Voiceout" column of the Gambianet to
>spread his
>         allegations. Now, his information is domestic consumption in The
>Gambia. You
>         think that if the Observer had carried his allegations, that
>probably would
>         have "compelled others with some knowledge of what happened to
>come forward
>         with their own version?" I doubt it. Quite recently, Local
>Government
>         Minister Yankuba Touray,whom Jallow alleges to have taken part in
>Koro's
>         death, villified the former AFPRC spokesman, rather than give his
>version of
>         the story pertaining to Jallow's allegations. Following Jallow's
>information
>         on Voiceout, the proprietors of Gambianet were summoned to the
>NIA, and
>         subsequently, Voiceout disappeared from Gambianet. Rather than
>speak on
>         Jallow's allegations and present their own version of the story,
>Jallow's
>         alleged culprits simply resorted to authoritarianism by clamping
>down on
>         Gambianet. Could a similar fate have happened to any Gambian
>newspaper which
>         published Jallow's allegations, especially if there were no
>substantiation
>         efforts on the part of the newspapers, and during those dark, lean
>days of
>         press intimidation?
>
>         Like I said before, newspapers have to be very careful not to
>publish
>         information they cannot substantiate when asked, in court, or by
>national
>         public opinion. In as much as we would have loved to render
>service to the
>         Gambian people by publishing Jallow's letter, we were equally
>restrained by
>         our bounden duty to publish something verifiable by us or the
>source of the
>         allegations.
>
>         I, personally, have written a lot in taking the AFPRC government
>to task for
>         foot-dragging on any investigations into Koro's mysterious death.
>I
>         interviewed the Ceesay family,and wrote a scathing column on the
>AFPRC's
>         false pretences of pain and misery over Koro's death, when they're
>unwilling
>         or unable to mount an inquiry into the late Finance Minister's
>mysterious
>         death.
>
>         Thanks for your comments. Bye.
>
>         Cherno Baba Jallow
>         Detroit, MI
>
>         >From: Bamba Laye <[log in to unmask]>
>         >Reply-To: Bamba Laye <[log in to unmask]>
>         >To: [log in to unmask]
>         >Subject: Ebou Jallows' revelations
>         >Date: Sun, 26 Dec 1999 20:15:00 -0600
>         >
>         >Cherno,
>         >You wrote:
>         >"Upon receipt of Jallow's letter, Daily Observer's editorial
>board sat down
>         >to determine the publishability of Jallow's contents on KOro's
>death. We
>         >agreed that they were serious allegations concerning senior
>members of the
>         >Ruling Council. And since there was no way to validate Jallow's
>         >allegations,
>         >we decided not to publish them, but only to put out an 'overview'
>story on
>         >Jallow's resignation letter."
>         >
>         >This is quite an interesting revelation from your end Bro. I am
>curious
>         >(and I am sure many on the list are) to know why your editorial
>board
>         >decided to discard Ebous' revelations at a time when it could
>have served
>         >justice in giving Koros' family and the entire Gambia an idea of
>the actual
>         >circumstances surrounding Koros' death. Don't you think that
>publishing the
>         >letter would have compelled others with some knowledge of what
>happened to
>         >come forward with their own version? Don't you feel that you've
>done some
>         >disservice to the people by not publishing the letter or atleast
>hinting at
>         >why you think the letter should not be published?
>         >I am also interested in knowing if Foroyaa had a copy of this
>letter and
>         >what have been done about it with regards to their own
>investigation into
>         >the matter?  I will be glad if Mr. Sallah could clarify this for
>me.
>         >
>         >Have a great week and stay safe.
>         >
>         >Abdoulie A. Jallow
>         >
>         >"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things
>that matter".
>         >  - Dr. M. L. King Jr.
>
>         ______________________________________________________
>         Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>         To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the
>Gambia-L
>         Web interface at:
>http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/gambia-l.html
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L
Web interface at: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/gambia-l.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2