GAMBIA-L Archives

The Gambia and Related Issues Mailing List

GAMBIA-L@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"A.B. Sidibe" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The Gambia and related-issues mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 12 Mar 2003 20:42:22 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (227 lines)
Who is my great-granfather?
Cheers!
Abdou


--- Matarr Amadou Sallah <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hello Everyone
> Here is somrthing to think about.
>
> Peter´s son is the father-in-law
> to the husband of your father´s sister.
> How are you related to Peter or what is Peter
> to you?
>
> Matarr
>
>
>
>
> >From: Amadu Kabir Njie <[log in to unmask]>
> >Reply-To: The Gambia and related-issues mailing
> list
> ><[log in to unmask]>
> >To: [log in to unmask]
> >Subject: EUobserver: New rules for third-country
> family reunification
> >Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 18:56:43 +0100
> >
> >Hi!
> >
> >This news item seems quite interesting for some
> reasons. The Scandinavian
> >countries, as opposed to the rest of Europe have
> been sneaking in 'laws'
> >that require DNA testing between parents and their
> offspring in order to
> >prove biological ties in family reunification
> applications.
> >
> >These are not 'laws' passed by parliament but
> rather 'regulations' crafted
> >by Immigration Authorities which allow them to
> 'offer' such tests to
> >applicants in family reunification cases; an
> 'offer' you don't dare refuse,
> >as that spells automatic rejection of your
> application.
> >
> >In Norway, among the list of twelve countries whose
> nationals are availed
> >this special 'offer,' ten are African: Somalia,
> Ethiopia, Sierra Leone,
> >Liberia, Nigeria, Ghana, Gambia and Cameroon; the
> other two non-African
> >countries being Afghanistan and Irak.
> >
> >That's not all, the applicants have to travel to
> the Norwegian embassy
> >nearest to their home country, which in Gambia's
> case for example, would
> >mean Abidjan in civil war-engulfed Ivory Coast and
> at the applicant's own
> >cost too, in order to give blood specimen. Specimen
> which is then supposed
> >to be dispatched to Oslo for analysis.
> >
> >Consular outpost like the one we have in the Gambia
> are not accepted as
> >being good enough to collect such specimen, an
> exercise than can be carried
> >out by even an auxillary nurse.
> >
> >It is also supposed to take three months from the
> collection of the
> >specimen till the result is made available, a time
> frame which does not
> >included the six months that it is normally
> supposed to take to process
> >such applications.
> >
> >One is naturally led to wonder why only certain
> hand-picked countries are
> >made this unethical 'offer'?
> >
> >Well according to the Norwegian Immigration
> Authority,
> >Utlendingsdirektoratet (UDI), the validity of
> documents from these
> >countries is questionable since they are known for
> their rampant
> >corruption. One concrete example they proffered was
> that a mother can just
> >walk into a health centre and quote a date of birth
> of a child, name of
> >parents, and be issued with a birth certificate.
> >
> >Question is, why would these same authorities that
> accept other documents
> >from these countries without question, choose to
> question the validity of
> >only birth certificates? Why are marriage
> certificates exempt, for example?
> >The whole scheme is suspect at best.
> >
> >As usual, there has not been any concerted response
> from the communities
> >involved. Some from the affected communities have
> even been blaming the
> >victims as there has been a general attitude of:
> 'It does not affect me;'
> >while some have refuse outright to append their
> signatures to a petition
> >intended to deliver some form of protest, set in
> motion by certain
> >concerned individuals. First it was only the
> Somalians, now there are nine
> >more African nationalities; today it is DNA
> testing, tomorrow?
> >
> >My understanding from conversations with Gambians
> resident in both Sweden
> >and Denmark, is that these countries instituted not
> only 'laws' that
> >'offer' DNA tests but more far-reaching and hostile
> one towards immigrants.
> >I just could not believe my ears when Momodou
> Camara explained to me the
> >length to which the Danish Immigration Authority
> has gone in order to
> >frustrate efforts by 'foreigners,' even those
> holding Danish nationality,
> >to have even their wives join them in Denmark.
> >
> >For the benefit of those who read
> Norwegian/Danish/Swedish, the circular
> >from UDI on DNA testing can be accessed at:
> >
>
>http://193.71.11.42/dokumenter/doc/rundskriv/2002/rs200229.doc
> >
> >Below is text of the petition. Those resident in
> Norway who wish to append
> >their signatures to it can also sign electronically
> by sending an email
> >with the heading "Petition" to: [log in to unmask]
> >
> >Gjenopprett offentlig tillit til
> Utlendingsdirektoratet (UDI)!
> >
> >Familiegjenforening - en menneskerett!
> >
> >
> >
> >Vi som bidrar med våre underskrifter er veldig
> bekymret for hvordan
> >Utlendingsdirektoratet (UDI) fungerer og hvordan
> UDI behandler de som søker
> >om familiegjenforening eller om besøksvisum for å
> møte slekt og venner
> >bosatt i Norge.  De siste årene har det kommet
> mange klager men få
> >endringer.  Faktisk ser det ut som om forholdene
> har forverret seg.
> >
> >
> >
> >Vi ber om at
> >
> >
> >
> >   a.. norske myndigheter baserer sin
> saksbehandling på bedre kjennskap til
> >lokale institusjoner for ekteskapsinngåelse og
> lokale forståelser av
> >familie og slektskap.
> >   b.. DNA-tester ikke tas i bruk i
> familiegjenforeningssaker, først og
> >fremst fordi DNA ikke er det viktigste kriteriet
> for familedannelse,
> >hverken i Norge eller landende innvandrere og
> asylsøkere i Norge kommer
> >fra.
> >   c.. minsteinntekt på 165 000 kroner i året som
> forutsetning for
> >familiegjenforening revurderes,  barns behov for
> oppvekst i samvær med sine
> >foreldre blir ikke mindre av at foreldrene har en
> lav inntekt.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >                                     Navn
> >                      Navn
> >
> >       1.
> >
> >      13.
> >
> >
> >       2.
> >
> >      14.
> >
> >
> >       3.
>
=== message truncated ===


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business online
http://webhosting.yahoo.com

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/CGI/wa.exe?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]

To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/gambia-l.html

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

ATOM RSS1 RSS2