GAMBIA-L Archives

The Gambia and Related Issues Mailing List

GAMBIA-L@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Yaya Jallow <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The Gambia and related-issues mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 12 Apr 2007 10:51:12 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (277 lines)
Very poignant analysis and I would even go further to say that this attitude affects even the private sector companies. I have some Gambian colleagues who have started businesses in the Gambia and have expressed frustrations with their employees' attitude toward work, and many have privately told me that they would rather hire non-Gambians living in the country such as Senegalese, Sierra Leoneans, and others.

Yaya Jallow     





----------------------------------------
> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 21:33:54 -0400
> From: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Fwd: Gambian attitude towards work: The Genesis of underdevelopment
> To: [log in to unmask]
> 
> Very thought provoking piece from the pages of The Gambia Journal
>  
> Letter To The Editor 
> 
> Gambian attitude towards work: The  Genesis of underdevelopment 
> By Abdoulie Sallah 
> Apr 11, 2007, 14:19 
> 
> Sometimes you tend to  wonder why a country so promising and full of 
> potentials is failing the dynamics  of development. In most cases one is tempted to 
> think that there are limited  resources to trigger socio-economic development. 
> But then I tend to pose the  question what if the Gambia a small but great 
> country was endowed with more  resources? Was this equation going to create more 
> socio-economic opportunities  and advancement or was it going to be a 
> catastrophic downturn? Conventional  wisdom will opine that if you cannot efficiently 
> and effectively manage a  village, then how can you be expected to manage a 
> city? The bottom-line argument  here is that if one’s attitude towards the 
> management of small resources is  lackadaisical and dysfunctional, then how is it 
> expected of one to manage bigger  resources?  A wiseman once stated that ‘a 
> vision without an action is a  mere dream and an action without a vision is a waste
> ’ but I will rephrase this  and say that great skills, expertise and 
> experience without appropriate  execution is a waste and a means to self-destruction. 
> This been said, I am not  unmindful that the Gambia has produced and will 
> continue to produce very  hardworking sons who will always remain a source of 
> inspiration to future  generations.
> A significant root to the development of underdevelopment in the  Gambia can 
> be traced back to the attitude of most of its workforce. Have you  ever 
> wondered why almost 60% of the employable population still remain  unemployed and 
> why nearly 70% of the population are depending on 30% of the  population? Most 
> people will tell me well the government of the day is not doing  enough. But 
> then I will ask you who the government is? Does it not constitute  our fathers, 
> mothers, sisters, brothers, cousins, friends and acquaintances? And  if this 
> is the case then are we not part of the government? The point here is  that we 
> must stop using the government as a scapegoat for everything that is  wrong 
> and for the failings of our fathers, mothers, sisters, brothers, friends  and 
> ourselves. Malcolm X the great civil right activist once stated that ‘you  
> cannot be blind with patriotism so much so that you cannot face reality, wrong  is 
> wrong no matter who does it or says it’. Henceforth we as Gambians need to  
> take a critical look at ourselves and re-evaluate our contributions towards the  
> dynamics of underdevelopment in our great and noble motherland and the first 
> and  foremost thing we need to take a hard look at is the attitude of the 
> workforce.  The attitude we have towards work will determine how successful we 
> become as a  nation because even if we have everything by our side and don’t 
> possess the  right attitude we will still fail. Even the expectation of a divine 
> intervention  will not help without the right attitude because over and over 
> again we do hear  the adage ‘God only help those who help themselves’ and God 
> Himself has  mentioned in the Qu’ran that He will not change the condition of a 
> nation  (people) until they change it for themselves or make an effort to 
> change it.  
> It is now time to call a spade a spade. Although there are pockets of  
> individuals who are very hardworking, honest, disciplined and sincere, however I  
> will not hesitate to say that most officials and ordinary people are very lazy,  
> dishonest, undisciplined, and greedy and lack dignity and integrity. They 
> have  no concept of direction and advancement and are thus sent wallowing into 
> the  ocean of opportunism by the winds of materialism. Have you ever taking time 
> to  visit offices during working hours in the civil service, government 
> departments  and para-statals? You will be surprise at what you see or may be not 
> because you  may have been groomed by this system. Whilst you may find a very 
> sizeable amount  of hardworking people stick to their desks proving very 
> productive, the majority  are usually found wondering in Alice’s land. What do I see 
> upon visiting  offices? Well I see people sleeping in their offices when they 
> should be  working; I see people forming their own chitchat forums mainly 
> full of gossips,  slandering and backbiting; I see people using what belongs to 
> the offices for  their own personal gains; I see people playing music and 
> dancing; I see people  trying to make love in the office; I see people signing in 
> and in a matter of  seconds signing out for the rest of the day; I see people 
> been abuse even though  they are the righteous ones; I see people who have no 
> responsibilities other  than going from office door to office door just lying 
> and seeking favours; I see  people who cannot even spell their names occupying 
> positions of responsibilities  and authority because they are the wives, 
> daughters, sons, brothers and sisters  of the ‘big’ people; I see people with no 
> job roles; I see people abusing the  trust and confidence of the Gambian 
> people; I see people who make themselves so  inaccessible to other people even 
> though they are there to serve the needs of  those people; I see people who condemn 
> injustice during the day and condone it  during the night; and I see much 
> more.
> Has is ever happened to you when you  were the most qualified person for the 
> job but because you have no contacts or  coming from a poor family background, 
> you lost the job? Has it ever happened to  you when you were due for 
> promotion due hard work and merit but because someone  is affiliated with a party or 
> an individual, they get the promotion? Have you  ever been dismissed for 
> telling the truth? Have you ever worked in an office  where it is a taboo to 
> challenge decisions, be rationale about ideas and be  truthful about reality? Have 
> you ever been isolated, discriminated and harassed  because you work hard, 
> because you are disciplined, because you are sincere,  because you are honest and 
> because you want to see justice and transparency?  Have you ever been 
> blacklisted, defamed or caricatured because you try to be  creative and innovative 
> about you job?
> Today the culture of the workforce in  the Gambia is castrating development 
> and causing an impotence to progress.  Nowadays you will have to know somebody 
> or have a contact to get the job done or  have a transaction successfully 
> completed. There is a lack of professional code  of conduct and even if there is 
> any, then people override it and use it to their  own advantage- that is 
> getting favours from each other. One day whilst in the  Gambia having a discussion 
> with a friend of mine, he related a very sad story  about a woman. This poor 
> woman from the province area (around Central River  Region) sadly lost her 
> husband who had served the Gambia all throughout his  life. All she needed was the 
> pension of her husband to maintain the family. She  came all the way to Banjul 
> for this simple transaction, which probably should  not have taken even a 
> week. Unfortunately for her she was referred to different  departments before 
> been finally redirected to the department she started from.  Her case was dragged 
> for over three months and as if this was not enough it was  not still 
> resolved. It was a friend of the woman who new my friend that asked my  friend to 
> help the woman even though my friend was in a totally separate  department. He 
> knew somebody in the other department and asked that individual  to help the 
> poor woman’s case and afterwards it took less than a week for the  woman to get 
> what was entitled to her.  Why should this be the norm? Why  does she have to 
> suffer before claiming what was entitled to her? Why should it  take longer 
> than usual to resolve her case? Why should it be a favour for her  case to be 
> sorted? What would have been her fate if no one tried to help her?  And just how 
> long would it have taken after the three months to get her case  sorted out 
> without any form of intervention?   
> This situation  reflects an undesired metamorphosis of socio-economic 
> development supported by  the pillars of venomous social reassurances. In a very 
> intensely competitive  world, gone are the days when you will sit and just do what 
> you have been asked  to do without involving any form of innovation and 
> creativity and going that  extra mile to explore other avenues in order to create 
> more opportunities. Time  and again I do hear management gurus saying that a 
> good worker creates more work  in an efficient and effective way. However, if 
> this is to be applied to the  Gambia, then we are thousands of miles away from 
> having good workers because the  minority of good   workers in the Gambia today 
> have been heavily  overshadowed by the bad workers and there efforts 
> neutralised, thus making it  very difficult to distinguish the good from the bad and 
> the bad from the ugly.  Our attitude towards work should not be about sitting 
> down and waiting to be  told what to do and when to do it, instead it should be 
> one that is proactive;  one that is target driven and success oriented; it 
> should be one that is  action-oriented and disciplined.
> 
> The way forward
> I have always told  people and my students that whenever you criticise 
> people, systems or  ideologies, don’t leave them hanging like that because it will 
> cause you to be a  victim of the very thing you criticise, thus offer 
> constructive alternatives.  This is exactly what I intend to do in this section. It 
> will be very unwise of  me to claim that my solution or alternative is universal 
> and that it is the only  solution. In fact what I am about to offer is not a 
> means to an end nor is it a  beginning to an end. All it will do will be to 
> create a beginning to the  magnetisation of other ideas and thoughts for a way 
> forward.
> Undoubtedly  change will be the foremost thing to be put into the equation 
> and not only  change but a change that is swift and radical. First of all, a 
> needs analysis  needs to be conducted in every department, para-statal, and also 
> in the civil  service, using the matrix analysis framework. It so happens that 
> most offices  and departments are overloaded with people who needn’t be 
> there, thus causing a  limbo in operations particularly cost. Most people in 
> organisations, departments  and offices don’t even have a job description and don’t 
> play any roles within  their organisations or departments. Conducting needs 
> analysis will enable  organisations and departments to identify their 
> resources, and the quality and  quantity of the personnel they would need to operate. 
> People only become idle  and lazy when they have absolutely nothing to do or 
> think about. People should  have enough work to keep them busy for the required 
> number of hours they are  expected to stay in their offices and not having to 
> stay in their offices for  eight hours just to be given a ten minute piece of 
> work for the whole day. The  needs analysis will also weed out the unwanted 
> people thereby saving cost for  the departments and organisations. Although this 
> may be seen as harsh and a  repetition of the retrenchment of workers as in 
> the days of the Economic  Recovery Programme, however the difference is that 
> cost saved will be reinvested  into the best, most qualified and hardworking 
> workers instead of repaying debts.  In addition, this will create a very 
> competitive atmosphere where people will  learn to value their jobs and always want to 
> make a difference in the workplace.  Similarly, conventional wisdom on 
> motivation will reveal that the better the  people are paid, developed and given the 
> right resources, the more likely they  will excel and bring about desired 
> results.
> In addition, another mechanism  that can be used to overcome the Gambian 
> attitude or work culture is the  introduction of systems that will monitor and 
> hold accountable each and every  individual within organisations and departments. 
> Here I am not talking about the  ‘police organisation’ or the ‘CCTV’ 
> organisation where freedom to be innovative  or creative is restraint and where 
> people’s privacy is invaded under the pretext  of organisational policies and 
> procedures. Rather I am referring to systems that  will lay solid foundations for 
> work ethic and professionalism, thus allowing  people to work professionally 
> but also be held responsible for their actions. I  am not also talking about 
> systems that will condone the blame culture or  bureaucracy, but systems that 
> will promote transparency, efficiency and  effectiveness. I am talking about 
> systems that will ensure that even the  organisation or department driver or 
> cleaner knows the strategic objectives of  the organisation/department and know 
> how their roles contribute to the overall  attainment of the strategic goals. It 
> is sad to note that even most middle level  managers in the Gambia know 
> neither the mission nor the objectives of their  respective organisations. How then 
> does one expect them to perform meaningfully  towards the achievement of such 
> objectives? What has happened to performance  management? What has happened 
> to employee development review? What has happened  to employee supervision? 
> What has happened to employee mentoring? What has  happened to appraisal? How 
> many of these systems are fully and regularly  utilised? Well if people don’t 
> have the technical know-how, how can they be  expected to do it? This leads me to 
> my next point.
> Capacity building or  development always proves to be very valuable. 
> Developing the expertise and  technical know-how of your employees is an investment 
> worthwhile both in the  short and long runs. Unfortunately in the Gambia this 
> valuable area of  investment is abused and totally alienated. It is the norm and 
> practice in  Gambian departments and organisations that capacity building and 
> development is  used as a mechanism for seeking and returning favours. People 
> are nowadays sent  to trainings, workshops, seminars, conferences, and 
> further studies not because  they are the most suitable and qualified individuals, 
> but because they simply  lick the backside of the ‘boss’. This has created a 
> phenomenon where the ‘boss’  becomes the hungry predator searching for its 
> preys in the vast ocean of  opportunism, eventually turning the employees into 
> opportunistic preys. Thus you  will have to do everything the boss says or else 
> you be held in solitary  confinement where you will never see the beaming rays 
> of training and  development. Another criteria for eligibility that is 
> usually considered when it  comes to training and development is personal 
> affiliation with the ‘big boss’ or  the ‘bigger boss’. Sometimes the boss, the big 
> boss and the bigger boss are so  greedy that they let nothing leak down to the 
> underdogs, even though they may  not need it but because of the allowances and 
> par-diems attached.  Recommendations for further training and development must 
> be critically assessed  and attached to the needs of the organisation or 
> department. Robust selection  criteria that are open and transparent must be put in 
> place allowing little or  no space for managerial discretion. May be having a 
> selection committee  comprising of sections of the organisation or department 
> will not be a bad idea.  The purpose of this committee will be to scrutinise 
> proposals coming from senior  management with reference to training and 
> development and scan selected  individuals against set criteria. This is neither 
> bureaucracy nor work  overloading, it is simply accountability.
> Finally, a new approach towards  public management must be introduced; one 
> that is independent and free from  politicisation; one that is very competitive 
> and customer oriented; one that  involves consultation with the very people 
> whose needs need to be served; one  that is target driven; and one that is 
> accountable to all stakeholders. I do not  mean privatisation here but something 
> like a competitive and non-commodified  alternative to capitalist corporations 
> who are target driven and profit  oriented. The delivery of public services 
> must be measured, planned, evaluated  and above all accounted for. I am not 
> saying that it is wrong to do favours for  people, but it must not be the 
> foundation for professionalism and certainly not  the corner stone for the delivery of 
> public services.
> The Gambia is a small  and peaceful country that has social values. Social 
> systems are good for  development and as a result must be valued and treasured. 
> I am saying we must  learn to help each other; I am saying we must learn to 
> lend a hand; I am saying  we must learn to support each other; I am saying we 
> must change our attitude  towards work if we are to reach the pinnacle of 
> advancement; I am saying we must  not base our decisions and work ethics on social 
> delusions but rather on  informed rationality guided by a sense of social  
> justice.     
> 
> By 
> Abdoulie Sallah
> PhD  Student
> University of Leicester School of Management (UK)  
>  
> 
> 
> 
> ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
> at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
> 
> To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
> To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
> [log in to unmask]
> 
_________________________________________________________________
Take a break and play crossword puzzles - FREE!
http://games.msn.com/en/flexicon/default.htm?icid=flexicon_ wlmemailtaglinemarch07
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html

To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤

ATOM RSS1 RSS2