Joe,
Please understand the woman is not trying to clear
her name for speaking to a paper, she is saying that she DID NOT SAY the things
the paper reported. My point is, you initially condemned the credibility of the
paper and now you are trying to make this very paper your bastion of defence.
Come on, raka. When you are wrong, you are wrong and the best defence in your
situation is to give-in to your mistakes and MOVE ON. Your
statement "I stand by my original comments" is a clear indication
that you want to "ras-to-ras" this issue. Well, if that is what you want, I have
no time for that. You can do it on your own. I hope Astrid, Dagma and Mrs
Samba-Christensen will leave you to enjoy yourself.
Cheers
Prince
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2000 11:31
PM
Subject: Re: Message from Mary
Samba-Christensen (Update)
Prince, the burden of proof on Mary, not me. She was
quoted by the
observed and I merely commented on her statements.
If she really
wants to tell the truth, why don't she demand an
apology from the
Observer. Until she does that, I stand by my
original comments. I
think you are partial in your comment, for
the quote is clear and
precise. Do you really believe that Mary
never spoke to the
reporter? If so, what do you base it on?
Don't tell me because she
said so. Until you do that,
please chill.
Chi Jaama
Get your Free E-mail at
http://www.gambianet.com
____________________________________________________________
Get
your 100MB FREE Internet storage! Sign up now
-
http://www.netdrive.com/?ao=zzn
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web
interface at: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/gambia-l.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------------