Hi folks,
I'm writing to express my deep disappointment with
George Sarr for sending in a posting that purportedly was from Tombong
Saidy. I am especially disappointed and saddened by the whole episode for
a variety of reasons: a) it was un-called for; b) it is unethical and
distracting; c) it came from I guy that I think should have known better.
Already, a number of subscribers have written to express their outrage, and
rightly so. The practice of spoofing (as computer geeks call it) has no
place on Gambia-L, and will not be tolerated.
After reviewing diverse reactions to Mr. Sarr's
postings, I called him on the phone to discuss the issue with him. I told
him that I was disappointed that he would indulge in such a practice, and was
especially saddened given that I was really looking forward to working with him
on setting up the Free Gambia Web site. He offered his apologies, and
expressed his remorse, as he has done on the list. I told him that in view of
the gravity of what he has done, along with the fact that his act threatened the
credibility and health of the dialog and debate on the list, I have decided to
side with Dr. Amadou Janneh, and Momodou Camara (two of the Managers of the
list) and terminate his subscription to Gambia-L. I also told him that
Sarian Loum (another Gambia-L Manager) had asked that he should not be expelled,
but suspended for a "couple of weeks" from the list. I told him the other
remaining Manager to be heard from is Mr. Tony Loum, whom I haven't heard from
for months, since he moved from Seattle, Washington.
In the circumstances, I would like to announce that
I will immediately be unsubscribing Mr. Sarr from Gambia-L. I have
explained to Mr. Sarr that the decision is personally very painful for me, but
at the same time, one that must be taken in the best interest of Gambia-L, and
indeed, The Gambia. It's not a question of our personal relationships, or
whether or not it is the right or wrong decision. As I explained to Mr.
Sarr, who knows, maybe time would prove me wrong. But at the end of the
day, I want to make it clear to all that the decision to formally terminate Mr.
Sarr's subscription to Gambia-L was a considered one, done in good faith, and in
the hope that it is what's best for the list.
Already, comparisons have been made between Mr.
Sarr, and Matarr Njie. I also explained the issues to Mr. Sarr.
Briefly, I told him that there are two major issues to consider when comparing
his case to Mr. Njie's. First, they both impersonated people in sending
e-mail to the list. However, I explained to Mr. Sarr, Matarr Njie's
offense in this regard is far more tolerable because he (Matarr) assumed a
fictitious name (Burama Manjang) rather than assuming someone else's identity
like he (Mr. Sarr) did.
The other issue worth considering in comparing Mr.
Sarr's case to Mr. Njie's is that Mr. Sarr, to his credit, admitted to what he
did, and apologized for it. In contrast, Mr. Njie decided to not only deny
ever impersonating anyone, but also engaged in a vicious campaign of hurling
insults at people, on and off the list. To make matters worse, he insulted
peoples parents, even when they had nothing to do with what he was complaining
about. For example, I have been the recipient of his insults by e-mail
whenever someone says something he doesn't like on Gambia-L, whether or not I
said a word on the issue. These insults have been going on since we took
him off Gambia-L, and although they have died down once in a while, there's no
telling when he's going to fire off his next volley. The last came just a
few days ago, May 21, to be exact.
In light of the above facts, I think there is no
point in keeping Mr. Sarr on the list, and re-instating Mr. Njie's subscription,
as Malafy Jarju suggests. In my mind, such an action will amount to race
to the bottom of our moral ladder. As far as I'm concerned, the debate (or
shouting match sometimes) we are in is one about morality and ethics.
There is absolutely no point in cutting corners here and there just because it
would be the most comfortable thing to do. As tough as the decision to end
Mr. Sarr's subscription is for me, both personally, and because of the
inherent risk in alienating some, it simply had to be taken
and gotten over with because we have make sure that the atmosphere of
dialog and debate is not poisoned by deceit, and unethical
behavior.
I should also mention that I told Mr. Sarr that as
far as I am concerned the only circumstance under which I will consider his
re-admission to Gambia-L is if and when I receive an e-mail from Tombong Saidy
(who was impersonated) asking that he has forgiven Mr. Sarr, and that we should
consider re-subscribing him. Mr. Sarr told me that such a decision was
unfortunate, because it will mean that once again, Tombong has won. I would add
that it is in fact The Gambia that has won, and even if it is Tombong that has
won, I would say that if only Mr. Sarr had not started the war, there would not
have been anything to win. Not even for Tombong.
On that note, I would like to encourage all of us
to move forward and leave this behind. The incident was unfortunate, and
I'm sure we're all mature enough to have learned well from it. Like I
heard someone say or I read somewhere, the important thing is that we are making
new mistakes, meaning that we are learning. After all, that's what it's
all about.
I think this e-mail also offers an opportunity to
comment on two other issues. First, Seedy Saidy Khan asked in an e-mail of
a few days ago, whether I was going to ban obituaries on Gambia-L! Just
like I objected to religious postings. I would like to assure Mr. Saidy
Khan that I certainly do not have such intentions, although I'll be honest with
you to say that all those condolence messages that I think should have been sent
privately, but end up on the list, make me worry about how much bandwidth and
disk-space we are consuming! I know, you might be saying what a bean
counter! But you know, somebody has to worry about these things. On the
other hand, I also feel that these public condolence messages also paint a true
picture of a very caring and loving people, and for this reason, help set the
record of our debates straight: that even though we might be on each other's
throats once in a while, at the end of the day, we all are of one
nation.
The next issue relates to a posting from Kebba
Dampha (by the way, there used to be a kind of sweet [candy] or "Tangal" in
Wollof called "Kebba Dampha") saying:
" ...you tried to make a distinction
between the use of force and the treat of force in Yaya's overthrow of Jawara.
I think that was just semantics. The truth of the matter is, Yaya used
unconstitutional means to overthrow a democratically elected government at a
time when Gambians had a better opportunity to get rid of the government through
a free and fair election."
Well, Mr. Dampha, I did not intend to play any game
of semantics there. The fact of the matter is that Jawara was overthrown
not by force, but by the threat of it's use. Remember, the military rulers
always prided themselves in pulling off a bloodless coup. And may I also
add that before you get the impression that I was at any one time a supporter of
the coup against Jawara, those who were on Gambia-L back then would recall my
saying that the coup was nothing but lawlessness, and that we had replaced
Jawara with a younger Jawara. What I didn't know then, was that the new
Jawara was also more ruthless.
And finally, I would like to take this opportunity
to express my sincere thanks to members of the Gambian media, especially those
that speak up, and continue to share their opinions with Gambia-L
subscribers. Foroyaa staffers (Halifa Sallah and Sheikh Tijan Nyang) are
outstanding in this regard, and despite the fact that I do have some deep
philosophical differences with their Party, I will for ever hold them in the
highest esteem. The Independent has also stood their ground, and I do
commend them for that. Keep up the great work!
I guess that's about it. I'll have to save
the rest for later. Have a great weekend, and best wishes in your
endeavors.
Katim