STOLE this article from eskimo.com. Works Cited listed at the bottom.
FACT SHEET
Scope of the Problem
Current national rates: Australia 15%(1), Canada 20%(2), the United States 60%(3).
In the U.S., over 1.25 million infants annually - more than 3,300 babies each day - one child every 26 seconds.
The surgery wastes more than $250 million health care dollars annually(4) as well as untold personnel hours.
Globally, 20% of male children will be subjected to some form of non-medically indicated genital mutilation.(5)
Early and Current Rationale
(U.S.) physicians thought it logical to perform genital surgery on both sexes to stop masturbation. This rationale was initiated in the English-speaking countries during the 19th Century.(6)
The current medical rationale for circumcision developed after the operation was in wide practice.(7) To make sons resemble their circumcised fathers, to conform socially with peers, to improve hygiene, to prevent phimosis, and as prophylaxis for infant urinary tract infections, sexually transmitted diseases, AIDS, and cancer of the penis/cervix.(8)
Decision Making
The circumcision decision in the U.S. is emerging as a cultural ritual rather than the result of medical misunderstanding among parents. It is more an emotional than a rational decision.(9)
Other factors affect parents’ decisions, including esthetics, cultural attitudes, social pressures and tradition.(10)
Ultimate decision may hinge on non-medical considerations.(11) Circumcision has become cultural surgery.(12)
Foreskin Function
When infant is incontinent, prepuce fulfills an essential function, to protect the glans.(13)
The foreskin is more than just penile skin necessary for a natural erection; it is specialized tissue, richly supplied with blood vessels, highly innervated, and uniquely endowed with stretch receptors. (T)he foreskin contribute(s) significantly to the sexual response of the intact male.(14)
This mucous-membrane contact [male foreskin and female labia] provides natural lubrication...and prevents dryness responsible for painful intercourse and chafing and abrasions that allow for entry of STDs, viral/bacterial.(15)
Penile Development
Development of the prepuce is incomplete in the newborn male child, and separation from the glans, rendering it retractable, does not usually occur until some time between 9 months and 3 years.(16)
(Infant) circumcision...traumatically interrupts the natural separation of the foreskin from the glans.(17)
Circumcision interferes with penile development, surgeon must tear skin from sensitive glans to permit removal.(18)
Immediate Risks and Complications
Complications are often overlooked or un(der)reported. Lacerations, skin loss, skin bridges, chordee, meatitis, stenosis, urinary retention, glans necrosis, penile loss, hemorrhage, sepsis, gangrene, meningitis.(19)
Literature abounds with reports, morbidity and death from circumcision Realistic (complication) figure is 2-10%.(20)
Long-Term Adverse Outcomes
Poor surgical result is not recognized until years later. Adverse consequences of infant circumcision on men’s health must be recognized by physicians, parents & legislators.(21)
Circumcision is a subtraction, removing one-third or more of entire penile skin - tragic loss of erogenous tissue.(22)
When sexually functioning tissue is removed, sexual functioning is altered. Penile changes are documented.(23)
Of 313 circumcised male respondents, 49.5% cited a sense of parental violation, 62% expressed feelings of mutilation, and 84% reported some degree of sexual harm [progressive loss of glans sensitivity, excess stimulation needed to reach orgasm, painful coitus and impotence].(24)
Body image survey found 20% of circumcised respondents cited dissatisfaction with their circumcision.(25)
Effects of Pain
Newborn infant responses to pain are similar to but greater than those in adult subjects. The persistence of specific behavioral changes after circumcision in neonates implies the presence of memory.(26)
Infant circumcision causes severe, persistent pain. Acetaminophen does not ameliorate pain of circumcision.(27)
Main structures for memory are functional in neonates and circumcision pain may have long-lasting effects.(28)
Maternal Bonding / Breastfeeding
Circumcision affects mother-infant interaction.(29)
When an infant is subjected to intolerable, overwhelming pain, it conceptualizes mother as participatory and responsible regardless of mother’s intent. Consequences for impaired bonding are significant.(30)
These are the first data suggesting a protective effect of breastfeeding against UTI.(31)
Breasts also produce large quantities of a hormone (GnRH) that may aid in development of a newborn’s brain.(32)
Infants feed less frequently after circumcision; observed deterioration may contribute to breast- feeding failure.(33)
A stressful, painful event such as circumcision appears to affect the feeding patterns.(34)
Questionable Benefits
Good hygiene can offer many advantages over circumcision.(35)
Circumcision has no significant effect on the incidence of common sexually transmitted diseases (STDs).(36)
Circumcision is not harmless and cannot be recommended without unequivocal proof of benefit.(37)
Not one confirmed UTI case in a normal male infant. All cases in infants with clear urinary birth defects.(38)
Antimicrobial management of UTI in infants is routine and outcome generally good. It is inappropriate at this time to recommend circumcision as a routine medically indicated procedure.(39)
Reported benefits in preventing cancer and infant UTIs are insignificant compared to surgical risks.(40)
Performing 100,000 mutilative procedures on newborns to possibly prevent cancer in one elderly man is absurd.(41)
Medical Ethics
It must be recognized that the child is normal as born and that circumcision inflicts loss of a normal body part and leaves a scar. This is contrary to the motto of medicine, “First Do No Harm.”(42)
The unnecessary removal of a functioning body organ in the name of tradition, custom or any other non-disease related cause should never be acceptable to the health profession...and breaches fundamental medical ethics.(43)
Children too young to give consent must be treated as individuals. The child must live with the outcome of decision.(44)
Obstetrical Involvement
Seventy-four percent (74%) of the Ob/Gyns surveyed perform circumcision. Ob-Gyn fees for circumcision range to $400, averaging $137 nationwide.(45)
Ob-Gyns not aware of preputial structure & function or growing numbers of men undergoing foreskin restoration.(46)
Restoration Movement
In North America many circumcised men are now becoming aware of the mutilation and the harm this has done to them, and some are seeking methods of replacing the lost prepuce.(47)
At the root of this reaction lies an awareness that a perfectly normal, healthy -- indeed, the most sensually responsive -- part of their penis was surgically amputated when too young/helpless to consent, refuse or resist.(48)
Children’s Rights
All childhood circumcisions are violations of human rights. ...It is the moral duty of educated professionals to protect health and rights of those with little or no social power to protect themselves.(49)
Circumcision is an issue of self-determination and autonomy.(50)
Imperative that children have the right to own their reproductive organs and to preserve natural sexual function.(51)
Circumcisions for personal preference of the parent(s) deny the infant the basic right to respect and autonomy.(52)
Every circumcision...is an assault on a child’s sexuality and a violation of his right to an intact body.(53)
Why Does It Continue?
Americans culturally acclimated/regard foreskin as non-essential, pathologic.(54)
Cultural, social and historical perspectives around infant circumcision control physicians and parents.(55) 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average of state and territory circumcision rates NOCIRC of Australia
Average of provincial circumcision rates compiled from Health & Welfare Canada and Statistics Canada
Average of regional circumcision rates compiled by National Center for Health Statistics
updated from Rockney, R. Newborn Circumcision. American Family Physician, October 1988:151-155
Wallerstein, E. Circumcision: Uniquely American Medical Enigma. Urol. Clinics of N America, February 1985;12:123-132
Milos, M. Circumcision: Male - Effects on Human Sexuality. Human Sexuality: Ency.. NY, Garland 1994:119-121
Paige, K. The Ritual of Circumcision. Human Nature, May 1989:40-48
paraphrased from Report of the Task Force on Circumcision. Pediatrics, August 1989; 84:388-391
Brown. M. Circumcision Decision: Prominence of Social Concerns. Pediatrics, August 1987;80:215- 219
Report of the Task Force on Circumcision. Pediatrics, August 1989;84-388-391
Poland, R. Question of Routine Neonatal Circumcision. New England Journal of Med, May 1990;322:1312-1314
Wallerstein, E. Circumcision: Uniquely American Medical Enigma. Urol Clinics of N Amer, Feb 1985;12:123-132
Gairdner, D. Fate of the Foreskin. British Medical Journal, December 1949:1433-1437
Milos, M. Circumcision: Male - Effects on Human Sexuality. Human Sexuality: An Encyclopedia
Ibid.
Gairdner, D. Fate of the Foreskin. British Medical Journal, December 1949:1433-1437
Milos, M. Circumcision: Male - Effects on Human Sexuality. Human Sexuality: An Encyclopedia
Denniston, G. Unnecessary Circumcision. The Female Patient, July 1992;17:13-14
Marshall, F. Complications: Pediatric Circumcision. Urol. Complic. Med-Surg. NY, Year Bk Med. 1986:387-395
Williams, N. Complications of Circumcision. British Journal of Surgery, October 1993;80:1231-1236
Snyder, J. The Problem of Circumcision in America. Truth Seeker, July 1989:39-42
Ritter, T. Circumcision Removes More Than a little Snip. Say No to Circumcision. Aptos, Hourglass 1992:18-1
Milos, M. Circumcision: Male - Effects on Human Sexuality. Human Sexuality: An Encyclopedia
Hammond, T. Awakenings: Prelim. Poll of Circ. Men. NOHARMM 1992:76-77 [POB 460795, San Franc., 94146]
Ibid.:73-75
Anand, KJS. Pain and its Effects on the Human Neonate and Fetus. New Engl J of Med, 1987;317:1321-1329
Howard, C. Acetaminophen Analgesia in Neonatal Circum.:Effect on Pain. Pediatrics, Apr 1994;93:641-646
Taddio, A. Effect Neonatal Circum. on Pain Responses at Vaccination in Boys. Lancet, Feb. 1995;345:291-292
Marshall, R. Circumcision: Effects on Mother-Infant Interaction. Early Human Development, 1982;7:367-374
Laibow, R. Circ: Relationship Attachment Impairment. NOCIRC Intl Symp. on Circumcision., San Francisco April 1991:14
Piscane, A. Breastfeeding and Urinary Tract Infection. Lancet, July 7, 1990:50
Koch, Y. Hormone in Breast Milk May Help Babies Develop. reported in Wash. Post - Health, May 24, 1994:5
Howard, C. Acetaminophen Analgesia in Neonatal Circum.:Effect on Pain. Pediatrics, Apr 1994;93:641-646
Marshall, R. Circumcision: Effects on Mother-Infant Interaction. Early Human Development, 1982;7:367-374
Krueger, H. Effects of Hygiene Among the Uncircumcised. Journal of Family Practice, 1986;22:353-355
Donovan, B. Male Circumcision & Common STDS in Developed Nation Setting. Genitourin Med, 1994;70:317-320
Thompson, R. Routine Circumcision in the Newborn. Journal of Family Practice, 1990;31:189-196
Altschul, M. Cultural Bias and the UTI Circumcision Controversy. Truth Seeker, July 1989;1:43-45
McCracken, G. Options in Antimicrobial Mgmt. UTI in Infants-Children. Ped Infect Dis J, Aug 1989;8:552-555
Lawler, F. Circumcision: Decision Analysis of its Medical Value. Family Medicine, 1991;23:587- 593
Denniston, G. Unnecessary Circumcision. The Female Patient, July 1992;17:13-14
Snyder, J. The Problem of Circumcision in America. Truth Seeker, July 1989:39-42
Toubia, N. FGM: Responsibility of Reproductive Health Professionals. Intl J of Gyn & Obst, 1994;46:127-135
Shield, JPH. Children’s Consent to Treatment. British Medical Journal, May 1994;308:1182-1183
Garry, T. Circumcision: A Survey of Fees and Practices. OBG Management, October 1994:34-36
Sorger, L. To ACOG: Stop Circumcisions. Ob.Gyn. News, November 1, 1994:8
Warren, J. The Case Against Circumcision. British Journal of Sexual Medicine, September 1994;21:6-8
Bigelow, J. Uncircumcising: Undoing Effects of Ancient Practice in Modern world. Mothering, Sumr, 1994:56-61
Toubia, N. FGM: Responsibility of Reproductive Health Professionals. Intl J of Gyn & Obst, 1994;46:127-135
Phillips, I. Advocacy: Rhetoric or Practice. Nursing BC, August 1994:38
Milos, M. Circumcision: Male - Effects on Human Sexuality. Human Sexuality: An Encyclopedia
Phillips, I. Advocacy: Rhetoric or Practice. Nursing BC, August 1994:38
Sperlich, B. Botched Circumcisions. American Journal of Nursing, June 1994;94:16
Altschul, M. Circumcision Controversy. AFP-American Family Physician, March 1990;41:817-821
Stein, M. Routine Circum.: Gap Between Contemporary Policy and Practice. J of Fam Pract, 1982;15:47-53
>From: Mohinder Bains <[log in to unmask]>
>Reply-To: The Gambia and related-issues mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: Female circumcision; My View.
>Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 14:34:39 GMT
>
>Harona,
>
>I am not suggesting that the practice be eradicated as you
>insinuated in
>your posting. There is an indication then that should FGM be
>performed
>under proper medical supervision then little or no complications
>would be
>involved. The reason for bringing up this topic was to provoke some
>thought
>along the lines of Medical supervison.
>
>Isn't it therefore hypocritical that many of us voice out our
>opposition to
>this practice for the simple reason that it is performed outside the
>realm
>of modern medical facilities and not for anything else. Wouldn't it
>be more
>acceptable if it was done under the supervison of a proper surgeon
>or
>medical personel.
>
>Almost all advocates of eliminating the practice of FGM have used
>words such
>as barbaric, horrific etc to describe the pains endured by people
>who were
>subjected to the treatment. I would say that this was not warranted
>nor
>justified bearing in mind that the ritual is a custom through many
>generations and needed to be looked at objectively.
>
>Thanks
>Hinder
>
>
>>
>>Bains,have you seen or ever heard about complications involved in
>>male
>>circumcision? If so enlighten us. And give forth reasons why it
>>should be
>>eradicated.
>>Good day.
>>Harona.
>>
>>
>>>From: Mohinder Bains <[log in to unmask]>
>>>Reply-To: The Gambia and related-issues mailing list
>>><[log in to unmask]>
>>>To: [log in to unmask]
>>>Subject: Re: Female circumcision; My View.
>>>Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 11:33:31 GMT
>>>
>>>I entirely concur with your opinion on this issue. Can this
>>>campaign be
>>>extended to Male Circumcision as well. I believe that Male
>>>circumcision
>>>could be described as genital mutilation. Isn't what is good for
>>>the
>>>gander
>>>should be good for the goose as well?
>>>
>>>Inviting all of you for your comments.
>>>
>>>Thanks Hinder.
>>>
>>>
>>>>From: JENNIFER EIDSON <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>Reply-To: The Gambia and related-issues mailing list
>>>><[log in to unmask]>
>>>>To: [log in to unmask]
>>>>Subject: Re: Female circumcision; My View.
>>>>Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 08:53:00 -0500
>>>>MIME-Version: 1.0 (WebTV)
>>>>Received: from [149.68.45.24] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id
>>>>MHotMailBBAB18C1000CD821EEE395442D18069F6; Mon Oct 09 06:54:48
>>>>2000
>>>>Received: from maelstrom.stjohns.edu (149.68.45.24) by
>>>>maelstrom.stjohns.edu (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id
>>>><[log in to unmask]>; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 9:53:06
>>>>-0400
>>>>Received: from MAELSTROM.STJOHNS.EDU by MAELSTROM.STJOHNS.EDU
>>>>(LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8d) with spool id 1070418 for
>>>>[log in to unmask]; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 09:53:05 -0400
>>>>Received: from mailsorter-105-2.iap.bryant.webtv.net
>>>>(209.240.198.118) by
>>>> maelstrom.stjohns.edu (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP
>>>>id
>>>> <[log in to unmask]>; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 9:53:03
>>>>-0400
>>>>Received: from storefull-628.iap.bryant.webtv.net
>>>>(storefull-628.iap.bryant.webtv.net [209.240.198.75]) by
>>>>mailsorter-105-2.iap.bryant.webtv.net (WebTV_Postfix) with ESMTP
>>>>id
>>>> D57092D07D for <[log in to unmask]>; Mon, 9 Oct
>>>>2000
>>>> 06:53:00 -0700 (PDT)
>>>>Received: (from production@localhost) by
>>>>storefull-628.iap.bryant.webtv.net
>>>> (8.8.8-wtv-e/mt.gso.26Feb98) id GAA10048; Mon, 9 Oct
>>>>2000
>>>>06:53:00 -0700 (PDT)
>>>>From [log in to unmask] Mon Oct 09 06:59:24
>>>>2000
>>>>X-WebTV-Signature: 1
>>>>ETAuAhUAqQz2wMe4QrdYEV1slcut7/+haR0CFQCibg8Ek6gSjC+6xbrTlXrZ4oYC7w==
>>>>Message-ID:
>>>><[log in to unmask]>
>>>>Sender: The Gambia and related-issues mailing list
>>>><[log in to unmask]>
>>>>In-Reply-To: Movement for the Restoration of Democracy in Gambia
>>>> <[log in to unmask]>'s message of Sun, 8 Oct 2000 20:39:23 EDT
>>>>
>>>>Mrdgny,
>>>>You say, "I happened to traveled upcountry and happened to stump
>>>>on one
>>>>of these occasion giving me the chance to have dialogue with a
>>>>couple of
>>>>elders supervising the rites of passage" Ok, so while your
>>>>sitting
>>>>back, (perhaps maybe even having green tea) having a talk with
>>>>the good
>>>>ole'boys, some poor girl is having her clitoris cut/ripped from
>>>>her
>>>>body! I see, you are really ready to help you fellow sisters.
>>>>Ok, you
>>>>say "female circumcision", and I say FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION!!!
>>>> One
>>>>in the same, if it makes you feel better to call it "Female
>>>>Circumcision". While your sisters, as you call them are half
>>>>sitting/lying there being held down getting their clitoris
>>>>cut/ripped
>>>>from their bodies. Hell, you call it whatever you like, I on the
>>>>other
>>>>hand will call it what it is; FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION!!!!!
>>>>You say, "the answers given, lead me to believe that, these
>>>>people need
>>>>more empowerment, financial, health, education, etc., instead of
>>>>damnation."
>>>>Seems to me they have enough "empowerment", seeing as the get
>>>>away with
>>>>the barbaric act that they are enabling others to preform this on
>>>>the
>>>>poor (and I don't mean in the sense that they have no money or
>>>>little
>>>>money), innocent, defenceless girls! Then you list "financial"
>>>>well
>>>>sure they need money, we all do but so in a sense you are saying
>>>>to me,
>>>>that if they had money then this would not be going on! I
>>>>seriously
>>>>doubt it! I guess I could also take it as, if they were not
>>>>bored, then
>>>>they would not be preforming this senseless, totally unnecessary,
>>>>barbaric acts. I don't quite get your idea of thinking. Maybe
>>>>its
>>>>mine? People like you scare the hell out of me! Yet another
>>>>"health"
>>>>well, guess what "female circumcision" leads to a lot of health
>>>>problems, even death. So I make my point again, Why even preform
>>>>FGM at
>>>>all? Your last, "education"; Well, look here! That is exactly
>>>>what we
>>>>are trying to do! EDUCATE, so that they STOP this totally
>>>>UNNECESSARY
>>>>ACT!!!
>>>>That is all we are trying to do, just simply tell the people that
>>>>they
>>>>don't have to preform FGM at all because it just causes a lot
>>>>more
>>>>unnecessary health problems. Sorry, I might sound a bit harsh
>>>>but the
>>>>fact is; that too many have already been scarred for life and
>>>>been lost
>>>>because of this practice and it needs to be stopped before we
>>>>loose and
>>>>scar more innocent girls. That is all I'm trying to do is
>>>>educate
>>>>people on this issue and I don't claim to be any professional or
>>>>anything other, than what I am and that is a concerned person! I
>>>>don't
>>>>stand behind any organization! I sign my e-mails to the group as
>>>>myself! I am concerned for the health and well being of these
>>>>girls that
>>>>go thru this every day and until I can do anything to help stop
>>>>this
>>>>unnecessary practice, I won't stop! Please be open and sign your
>>>>name
>>>>to your e-mails and not your groups name! I don't think that is
>>>>too
>>>>much to ask!
>>>>
>>>>Love,
>>>>Jennifer Eidson
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>_________________________________________________________________________
>>>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
>>>http://www.hotmail.com.
>>>
>>>Share information about yourself, create your own public profile
>>>at
>>>http://profiles.msn.com.
>>>
>>>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the
>>>Gambia-L
>>>Web interface at:
>>>http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/gambia-l.html
>>>You may also send subscription requests to
>>>[log in to unmask]
>>>if you have problems accessing the web interface and remember to
>>>write
>>>your
>>>full name and e-mail address.
>>>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>_________________________________________________________________________
>>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
>>http://www.hotmail.com.
>>
>>Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
>>http://profiles.msn.com.
>>
>>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the
>>Gambia-L
>>Web interface at:
>>http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/gambia-l.html
>>You may also send subscription requests to
>>[log in to unmask]
>>if you have problems accessing the web interface and remember to
>>write your
>>full name and e-mail address.
>>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_________________________________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
>http://www.hotmail.com.
>
>Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
>http://profiles.msn.com.
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the
>Gambia-L
>Web interface at:
>http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/gambia-l.html
>You may also send subscription requests to
>[log in to unmask]
>if you have problems accessing the web interface and remember to
>write your full name and e-mail address.
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com .