Mr Drammeh, Why I you still stalking me? Have I become that much important to you that you keep butting in my conversations? I thought we had a peaceful agreement in private to agree to disagree but disagree without resorting personal vendetta. That was the sole reason I wrote to you in private because I will entertain personal vendetta on this public forum, not my forte. Since we both knew each others private e-mails, we can squash what- ever we have in private without giving decent peopl on the L untimely migraine. But little did I know you verbal ordeals to misunderstood what I meant when I ask you what was up with the fussing and fighting. I even went on to say if we can all get along despite the diferences we have. I know i may not be able to change your perception but we must agree to dis- agree respectfully. Seeing how far you were going with your argument and vulgarity and threats you made towards me, forced me to engage you in private. Don't get it twisted again, because just because we differ in opinions doesn't mean I hate you. You said I wrote you in private telling you how I like you because you are a person who doesn't give up easily? Mr Draameh please read my e-mail again and try not to get it twisted. What I was telling you is simply that a person who doesn't give easily is my kind of guy and I was beginning to like you because of that. It was your persistance that I was referring not you the fence-shitter. Get it? Mr Drammeh, I have no idea what you're insuating again, but I am a married man and I love my wife and daughter very much. You are giving me creeps here. I also notice that you are still referring to me as Mr Make-A-Villain, well equally, from now on I will refer you as 'Phi-A-Horana' which means a hypocrite, sure you heard it before. See how it feels now. Anyone can be an a**hole if they choose to engage in unconstructive debate. It's not how bad you demoralize your opponent but how well you substantiate your arguments. Yes, I did ignore your last posting and never read it, but when I saw Soffie Ceesay or Saul Khan write something I usually value their opinion and so I read it. I saw that they try to teach you the rudiments of rational government and what obligations ordinary citizens ought to profess. And even though you warned me to just be quiet, I had also warned you that I will NOT be silenced nor demoralized by FENCE-SHITTERS because the opinion of a fence-shitter simply doesn't entice me an iota. Since you cannot engage me constructively, I decided to handle whatever beef you had on me in private. Simply as that. I don't know! I don't hate you! And quite frankly, I don't like you(i.e 'Phi-A-Horana' , the fence-shitter), KAPUT! So you ride with your opinion and I ride with mine, but let that not fool you to believe I will entertain personal vendetta in this public forum.Not my forte, you dig? I may respect you as a gambian brother but not as a fence-shitter. That is where we differ, my brother. I hope you have good day because mine will. As the wollof saying goes 'Lu Wang-Ha Di-Doh Norr'. Gotta go ! Gotta go! See ya! Eeeeeyyyyaaaaiiiiaaaahhhhoooooooo! It's had being a Gambian!..........uuuuuhhhnnggh!...........lord have mercy!!! Still not interested, Mr Makaveli PS: I swear this time that I will not be tempted again to respond to you even if curse at my dog.(o-;)hehehe! But you never know, there are always exceptions. And please take it easy before you give yourself a Cardiac Arrest. Remember, I am not the enemy and neither are you. It's our DESPOTIC REGIME my brother. Let's shift our energy toward that fight. Oops!I forget. You're neutral. A fence-shitter. Ha! I must be thinking of someone else.Go figure! From: Harona S Drammeh <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: To Be Or Not To Be? To: [log in to unmask] Date: May 19, 2001 Ya Soffie: Your contribution is interesting. However, i'm not all too clear about your position vis-a-vis my opinion as expressed earlier, perhaps you will shed more light on it. The label fence-sitter was not of my own making and i doubt Ous made it up too. It was given to us. I don't have a problem with it. Do you? My brother, Amadou, you probably have lost contact with your folks and politics back home to argue that i'm neutral simply for want of keeping my job. People have yelled their guts out in support of the President and the APRC government, yet, they get fired in the most shameful way. If people who openly support the APRC can be fired, what about some neutral, "fence-shitting" person? Yours was a poor arguement, try again! Koto Saul, you make me believe even further that oppressed people can also have oppressive tendencies only if given the chance. Kara: I thank you for your contribution, atleast it makes me feel there still are people who understand what politics is all about. Once again, i thank you. Mr. Make-A-Villain Sarr: You are a very dishonest person. You wrote to me in private earlier today, telling me how you like a person like me. That i'm persistent and do not give-up. Only to turn around and start fighting me again. What do you call this? It is worthy reminding you that your position was to not read any of my posts. Yet, you did! See, it is all about honesty, integrity and being a person of your word. You did not have to write to me in private and on the public forum writing the opposite of what you send to me privately. This is dishonesty. It must not be tolerated. Are you becoming a fence-SHITTER? Goodnite. Harona. Gambians Online " Designed With The Gambian People In Mind" http://www.gambiansonline.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface at: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/gambia-l.html You may also send subscription requests to [log in to unmask] if you have problems accessing the web interface and remember to write your full name and e-mail address. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------