Ecotourism often involves small-scale tourism oriented to natural areas, wildlife, and traditional culture. Typically, ecotourism contributes to rural economies and to maintaining land in a natural state.
Potential Benefits and Costs of Ecotourism
Ecotourism is growing in many parts of the world, which Gambia should not be an exceptional, and is mostly on public lands. As the numbers of tourists grow, so does the interest in seeing new places and seeking new experiences, and some of these locations show how tourism can have negative impacts. Poorly planned and managed ecotourism may damage the same wildlife, natural or cultural resources that draw the tourists. It is difficult to evaluate benefits and costs of ecotourism, and these may vary over space and over time. However, the primary benefits are:
The economic cost are
Environmental degradation (related to visitor activities, management or behaviour).
economic instability and inequity (any form of tourism may be an unstable income source, particularly due to external factors such as natural disasters, currency fluctuations, or political instability. The other problem is that financial leakage of tourist expenditures may occur, whether out of the region, or out of the country)
. socio-cultural changes (while change may be both positive or negative, the negative is more usual when communities are not given the opportunity to decide if they want to become involved with tourism, and how)
THE IMPACT OF TOURISM:
Tourism’s impacts are often grouped in economic, environmental, social, and finally cultural.
The potential positive impact include :
1. Building community pride,
2. Inhancing the sense of identity of a community or a region,
3. Promoting intercultural unity and understanding,
4. Encouraging revival or mentenance of traditional crafts,
5. Enhancing external support for minority groups and preservation of their culture,
6. Enhancing local and external appreciation and support for cultural heritage.
Whereas positive impact are available, there should also be profund negetivities to be able to balance the effects in their functionaries. These includes:
1. Cheapening of our culture and traditions. The undisputed evidence can be seen in the Gambia hotel workers appearances which is very western. Instead, I think they should promote and hale our tradition and culture by appearing with (chaya and mallans etc). In this way we will not alienate and loss our cultural identies.
4. Displacement of traditional residents as seen in the kotu areas etc all because of lack of electrical efficiency in the rural areas. This is also resulting to comflict over land right and access to resources.
The grouping of the impacts into positive and negetive can also be or atleast be subjective, as whether the given impact is good or bad will depend on one’s perspective. For example, some community residents may desire cultural changes, while others may oppose it. The demontration effect, resulting from exposure to western habit and lifestyles because of tourism. However, the government should look thoroughly into the negative aspects such gamblig businesses placed in the hearts of township to ruin the local population. Tourism is to generate the economy but not to distroy the family lives of the people who should benefit from it. I for one, am against using and distroying the poors to generate individual incomes.
Likewise, some may desire continuity in local economic and political relationships, while others may desire reduction in income inequalities. Person wishing to sell land will favour increase land prices, while those who wish to buy land or to retain land they own would oppose increased prices.
It is however, clear that tourism generates a variety of impacts, and a key goal of sustainable tourism is to generate a more favorable balance in these impacts. The balance will be site specific and will depend on various factors, most importantly how tourism is planned, developed, and managed.