Haruna What a good commentary. I wander why folks even want to take position from this criminal regime. Yahya Jammeh should be isolate in all circle. It unethical and immoral to work for a regime that has a blood in their hands. Yahya JAMMEH is inconsistance and manipulative. He has reduce educative folks like nursery school children.Taking a position from a paranoid individual like Yaya Jammeh whom even children knows he mental sick will keep demoralizing.Can we count the number of Secretaries of state fired from 1994 to today? Haruna Darbo <[log in to unmask]> wrote: The enormously high turnover of Secretaries of State in Gambia is both worrying and demoralizing. It has a tendency to diminish both the value and potential for the offices and the persons to occupy those offices. The SOS position is a purely political office in The Gambia. It has been since time immemorial. Persons appointed to these offices generally only have to demonstrate unequivocal loyalty to the governing APRC. They are not screened for expertise or knowledge, nor for honesty and integrity. The recent appointment of Mr. Bojang to the Department of Works and infrastructure bucks that trend to a certain extent and I hope it marks a deliberate departure from what normal course of business and not a mere aberration. For the mere fact that SOSs are chosen for loyalty rather than acumen or capabilities, not much in the way of project implementation or value development is expected of them and therefore they are not generally conditioned to perform. They are simply there as a tool for wealth distribution for the ruling party. The old adage "you can't squeeze water out of stone" is apt in this case. Yahya therefore, unless he follows the Mr. Bojang's more sober appointment, will end up setting himself up for more frustrations and disgust. The remedy for such frustration usually is the unceremonious removal of the SOSs and or dragging them to court for charges of mismanagement and theft of public property and funds. A case can be made for the propriety of such prosecution if Yahya demonstrates a pattern of appointing unfit SOSs who are genrally ignorant of the tasks of the department, regardless of the merits of the charges against or the reasons for removal of the SOS. A further inadvertent effect of high turnover in political appointments is the gradual alienation of party loyalists that he can ill-afford especially at times when he needs the countervailing voices of his party loyalists against the chorus of disdain outside APRC circles. I understand that the pool of productive men and women he draws on for the SOS positions is unfortunately small and ever-dwindling. But one of the problems of the image that Yahya can hire and fire at will, mostly unceremoniously and without substantive reason, feeds into a patronnage psychy that diminishes the value of performance. It becomes more important to sing praises to him rather than accomplish tangible gains in development and completing his own wishes.for Gambia. There is no greater honour for a leader than the show of his worth. In such a scenario as exists in Gambia now, it may be advisable to rely on the under-secretaries and permanent secretaries for performance and implementation of departmental programs and projects and rely on the SOS necessarily as intermediary between the President's office and those technocrats to convey the President's platform for development. The SOSs must not, for conflicts of interest reasons, be bursars or treasurers of project funds. Appropriations to departments must not be made to the SOS. The SOS must be viewed as the ceremonial head of the department and much of his time ought to be accorded in holding public hearings and engagements. The broader policy conveyor. Recently, I have noticed that the idea and culture of "family" is being propagated as incentive for performance and honesty. This I think could be counter-productive and is ill-advised. Rather a culture of professionalism and accountability would yield Yahya more favourable results. Most business and professional persons will advise that the inordinate infusion of family inordinately burdens decision-making and performance with nepotistic considerations which are hard to qualify or mitigate. When you communicate a culture of family, though seemingly benign, you are emphasizing inherent value of pedigree and inheritance rather than merit. And in an environment where an SOS is appointed based on loyalty rather than acumen, this could be a recipe for further lethargy and conflicted interests. The rate at which such themes travel within the fabric of the department is faster than that at which productivity and performance make their way into psychies. A churchman Jacobs out of Harrisburg Texas once noted: "Idle men with hungry families made a ready audience for (graft and graffignette)". I wish Mr. Bojang all the best as he efforts to break the mold of lethargy, non-performance, and graft. Haroun Masoud. MQDT. Darbo. Al mutawakkil. It is equally malignant to set the wrong theme for the departments of state. ************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com いいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいい To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to: [log in to unmask] いいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいい いいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいい To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to: [log in to unmask] いいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいい