Dear Suntou,
I totally disagree with everything you have stated in the
piece. You have deliberately disregarded the fundamental issues that gave rise
to the adoption of the 1996 constution.
Firstly, there was the National Consultative Committee (NCC)
comprising of every sector of GambiaN society. Next the Constitution commission
who produced the draft. The draft was then submitted to the council. The AFPRC
council like every decision making body did not like certain aspects of the
draft and they went ahead and amended those aspects. It is their prerogative
because they held the power. Now, if some Gambian, somewhere in Europe, Asia,
America, you name it, seemed unhappy with council at the time, they had the
option to pick up arms and unseat the AFPRC council or force them to accept the
original draft; which by the way was unknown to us except through
spectulations. You can read and so do many other Gambians. If you think PDOIS
was misinterpreating the document to Gambians, why take the back seat Suntou.
Jump on the spotlight and tell the Gambian people what you think was in the
document. So don't blame PDOIS for so-called misleading you or Gambians.
You see, common sense will tell any sensible and peaceful
Gambian that THE 1996 YES vote casted was not a BASTARD VOTE as you indicated. People like me who voted
yes for the draft are proud of that vote. It was a lesser of two evils. Because
rejecting that draft was not a good idea. Firstly because, we bbelieved the
military had outlived its welcome. So rejecting the draft means prolonging
military stay in power because they can claim "we have to go back to the
drawing board to re-do the draft again". And this means more time.
Secondly, there was no clause so entrenched that it could not be unchanged in
the future. Thirdly, PDOIS has figured out if your enemy decide to pack up to
leave the stage, you don't lay mines in their way. Think carefully about it Mr
Suntou.
I may not change your opinion, but that isn't my primary
goal. If your objective is to write a history to suit your taste, then those on
the ground like me will present a more unbias picture that reflected reality.
You have a choice to tell it the way you want it. We have an obligation to lay
it out the way it unfolded, and this we call HISTORY 101.1A
Mr Touray:These are very serious allegations. If you are going to question the PDOIS Executive's integrity, you should at least advance some facts to back up your allegations. I am puzzled as to how your headline is about ''analysis of events leading to 1996 elections'' then you proceeded castigate the PDOIS Executive. Please read on
My humble analysis of events leading to 1996 elections.
Following the military coup of 1994 a Draft Constitution was drawn for Gambians to approve. Many at the time had no idea about the vital contents of the document under review. During that void period of ignorance and uncertainty the Executive of PDOIS went about canvassing for people to endorse by a 'Yes' vote. With expectations that PDOIS Executive knew what was at stake, majority of Gambians naively voted in favour of a totally bastardised Constitution.
The fact that term limits was not included in the FINAL DRAFT of the 1996 constitution has nothing to do with PDOIS. If PDOIS assessed the 1996 constitution to the best of their ability and found it to be a lesser of two evils(decrees Vs. flawed constitution), then went on to canvass for it, maybe you can question their judgement but not much else.
Vital elements of the draft Constitution had already been sliced out of it and yet PDOIS political experts did not let Gambians know that. One such important input of the Draft Constitution was about the Presidential Term Limit. This was deliberately omitted and Gambians voted for a constitution that was to give any sitting president a blank ticket for life rule.
To put things in perspective: the constitution did not contain term limits previously and it's a bit unrealistic to expect that the A(F)PRC we come to know (or most who came to power by force for that matter) would have yielded to such demands. Term limits is the way froward, but only a tiny minority of countries actually have it enshrined in their constitutions.
It may be argued that though the military knew what they were doing by intentionally deleting that good part of our nation's book of rules, it was PDOIS Executives who confused Gambians more seriously.
Please tell me how PDOIS confused Gambians?!? Your this write up is very thin on evidence.
The question remains as who to blame. There were good reasons why the military deleted anything to do with Presidential term Limit. There were better reasons why PSDOIS Executives decided to trick Gambians into voting for a constitution that was totally flawed.
How did you come to the conclusion that PDOIS did trick people to vote yes? And if so could you explain what they did wrong? The Military deleted the term limits from the FINAL DRAFT yet you are looking for someone else to blame.
The military at that time banned all political parties and believed the next election was a ready beef to bite and chew. Executives of PDOIS thought it was all in their favour being the only active political party operating in total defiance of Military ban on all political parties.
May I remind you that Foroyaa is newspaper. Now can you back up your above sentence with some evidence of how PDOIS was the only operational political party at the time, and how they operated in defiance of the ban on all political parties?
Elections came in 1996 and results showed PDOIS further down rejection lane. Other parties could not heal the fatal wounds inflicted by the long spell of ban that kept them away from genuine politics. Since then the political atmosphere continues getting more and more imbalanced for any decent politics in Gambia.
After wallowing in glee long enough, you might realise that in 1996 new parties sprang up, there where old parties that morphed into new ones, the A(F)PRC had the power to influence the result no matter how people voted. So this was a completely new terrain, your comparison is irrelevant.
For historical reflections, the Executive of PDOIS can now keep the crown for leading Gambians towards a political doom.This is suppose to be ''analysis of events leading to 1996 elections'', but all you did is castigate PDOIS and not offer any shred of evidence to back up your serious allegations.Cheers,E. JahOn Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 7:45 PM, SUNTOU TOURAY <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
���������������������������������������������������������¤ To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
My humble analysis of events leading to 1996 elections.
Following the military coup of 1994 a Draft Constitution was drawn for Gambians to approve. Many at the time had no idea about the vital contents of the document under review. During that void period of ignorance and uncertainty the Executive of PDOIS went about canvassing for people to endorse by a 'Yes' vote. With expectations that PDOIS Executive knew what was at stake, majority of Gambians naively voted in favour of a totally bastardised Constitution.
Vital elements of the draft Constitution had already been sliced out of it and yet PDOIS political experts did not let Gambians know that. One such important input of the Draft Constitution was about the Presidential Term Limit. This was deliberately omitted and Gambians voted for a constitution that was to give any sitting president a blank ticket for life rule.
It may be argued that though the military knew what they were doing by intentionally deleting that good part of our nation's book of rules, it was PDOIS Executives who confused Gambians more seriously.
The question remains as who to blame. There were good reasons why the military deleted anything to do with Presidential term Limit. There were better reasons why PSDOIS Executives decided to trick Gambians into voting for a constitution that was totally flawed.
The military at that time banned all political parties and believed the next election was a ready beef to bite and chew. Executives of PDOIS thought it was all in their favour being the only active political party operating in total defiance of military ban on all political parties.
Elections came in 1996 and results showed PDOIS further down rejection lane. Other parties could not heal the fatal wounds inflicted by the long spell of ban that kept them away from genuine politics. Since then the political atmosphere continues getting more and more imbalanced for any decent politics in Gambia.
For historical reflections, the Executive of PDOIS can now keep the crown for leading Gambians towards a political doom.
To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to: [log in to unmask] ����������������������������������������������������������
���������������������������������������������������������¤ To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.htmlTo Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to: [log in to unmask] ���������������������������������������������������������¤