Settle down Olfactor. Why are you so easily excited. You need to be careful
 Cos you live in Dublin. You can't be this jittery and enjoy Dublin you
know.  Beta ax somebody. Now wait just a minute; Why are you trying to speak
for  others?This is bloody annoying and fallacious (High Sounding Words are
beautiful). No one is attempting to intimidate  Suntou. You had already
forgotten about Halifa's quip about not speaking  for anyone else and not letting
anyone speak for you. OR is it supposed to be  that You can speak for other
people but don't let them speak for you? You're  confusing me Olfactor. I
still like you though. You have a funny way of speaking  with me but not
really wanting to speak with me?? Its strange but I'm kinda  getting to like.
Evian don't get any funny ideas. I'm still your Grand-Dad.  Olfactor says he
loves Joe more than yours truly. That is unacceptable. You need  to speak to
this man on my behalf Evian. Are you sure he's not your twin  brother?? Mams
wants in your friggin Vous! How's about it? I want in too, but  not until
Olfactor loves me at atleast as much as Joe or more. I'm not having  it. How
can he compare me to friggin Joe?? Olfactor has no  scruples.

Haruna.


In a message dated 4/17/2009 10:50:19 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:

2. ' If I ever  mentioned grandstanding it was in reference to Evian,
Olfactor, Jabou,  Dramane, Laye, et al's posturings and attempted intimidation of
 Suntou.'

This is bloody annoying and fallacious  (High Sounding Words are
beautiful). No one is attempting to intimidate  Suntou.  Since you spoke of wringing
my small neck, i too will wring  yours if  you do not stop saying (speaking
for myself) that by simply  asking questions is an attempt on my side to
intimidate Suntou.

Who  the hell im in this world and what powers have i got to intimidate 
anyone.  Even if i had any powers in terms of wealth, intellect,  charisma,
and the looks my last objective and desire is to intimidate  anyone.  The
thought that im trying to intimidate Suntou only resides in  you.  I totally
reject your insinuation and it pisses me.  It is  really fiction to think that
Suntou is being muscled.  He is a citizen  with an opinion thrown at me via
this forum and i reserve every bloody right  to throw the shit back him.

I love you too and but i do love Joe Sambou  even more.

Momodou Olly Mboge

Unrepentant PDOIS fanatic and  incurable Halifa disciple even if rejected

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 3:16 PM, <[log in to unmask]
(mailto:[log in to unmask]) >  wrote:


OK, I got it here Laye. You're right the question must have been lost  in
the shuffle. Thanks for burying it again here. What is wrong with  yew?

So if I get it right, your query, or really challenge is: [I asked  Haruna
to reconcile his stance on Ousainou's 1996 decision to that of  his
insinuation that Halifa's move against the witch hunting debacle  was political
grandstanding; we lost that answer somewhere in the  traffic jam.] Laye.

I'm not sure I understand the query. These are my shortcomings:
1. What is my stance on Ousainou's 1996  decision (I suppose you refer to
Ousainou's decision) to seek refuge in  his neighbour, the Senegalese
Embassy). In response to Dramane's  witch-hunting, I proposed that Ousainou's
decision was private and based on  advice from his party associates who were
concerned about his welfare.  And that votes were already cast, and were being
counted. This tells me that  he ought not be out and about anyway for
democracy's sakes. However and FYI,  I cannot have a position on the personal
decision of other regarding their  welfare. That will have been presumptuous of
me. I share here my verbatim  response to Dramane:


[It seems to me Mr. Drammeh that this question  is best asked of Ousainou.
And the value of the answer to be assessed by  you. It seems a personal
matter involving personal calculus. UDP partisans  are encouraged to make their
judgement of their leader too. I am informed of  the ambiance of the event
and It happens to be of no significance or  consequence to the good of
Gambia. I am sure Ousainou acted on information  and counsel of his party members
and others in the know of his welfare. The  votes were being counted after
the votes were cast. It is the threat on his  person that ought to yield
query. Also, It may be wise to address the  Hon. Ousainou as Ousainou or Mr.
Darboe in your fact-finding  mission.

Haruna.]


2. I did NOT INSINUATE that Halifa's  "Fact-finding" expedition was
political grandstanding. If I ever  mentioned grandstanding it was in reference to
Evian, Olfactor, Jabou,  Dramane, Laye, et al's posturings and attempted
intimidation of Suntou. What  I did say about Halifa's demarche was that it was
both a calculated  attempt to yield PDOIS attenuated fortunes and a concern
for the human  rights of his fellow citizens of Sintet and Makumbaya. A
confluence  of ideas, which but for Suntou's atrophied expedition, risks  being
one big haze of listless mirages.
In my opinion, and when Halifa himself was  arrested for his expeditions
(whether you agree with the process or politic  of it), Halifa's human right
now trumps any calculus. Now after Halifa's  release, and the subsequent
withdrawal of the cockamayme charges by an  uncouth and clueless prosecutor, IT
IS PARAMOUNT TO FOCUS ON THE HUMAN  RIGHTS OF THE FOLK OF SINTET, MAKUMBAYA,
and the other 2/3 villages and  communities where WITCH-HUNTING WAS BEING
CARRIED OUT.

WHAT DOES this mean Laye? It means that instead  of pouncing on Suntou for
nought, and now that Halifa has been released and  all erroneous charges
have been dropped, the NEXT STEP, is perhaps to seek  redress for the victims
(All of Them) of the witch-hunting saga AND Halifa's  wrongful arrest,
detention, and attendant abrogation of rights of his family  and friends to see
him while in detention. DO YOU BY CHANCE GET THIS?? Why  does Suntou's query
of Halifa's motives TRUMP the immediate above in
significance?????????????????
Would that not BETRAY THE MOTIVES OF HALIFA's  REMOTE-CONTROL IF NOT HALIFA
HIMSELF??????? Would it were not for your  gesticulations, and muscling of
Suntou into submission and the casual  abrogation of his right to free
speech and expression, The SELFLESSNESS  part of HALIFA's EXPEDITION could have
overwhelmed any interest-peddling he  may have been engaged in. AND, the
fruits of his loves' labours could have  been on their merry ways to ripening.
IN OTHER WORDS, LIFE IN GAMBIA, OR  ANYWHERE ELSE IN THE WORLD, DOES NOT STOP
WHEN HALIFA's MOTIVES ARE  QUESTIONED. DO YOU GET IT NOW??????? GOOD. THAT
IS INSIGNIFICANT AND  MINISCULE COMPARED TO THE COOMONER RELIEF THE
FACT-FINDING ITSELF COULD  YIELD. WHETHER OR NOT THE FACT-FINDING WAS SINCERE,
HONEST, POLITICAL,  or short on PROPRIETY. SO STOP THE IDIOCY AND RECONNOITRE FOR
 VALUE-LIFE.

Haruna.


In a message dated 4/17/2009 12:06:57 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] (mailto:[log in to unmask])  writes:

Here's the skinny Ginny (add that to your comic collection).  You,
Suntu and Haruna have one thing in common, as I observed.  You say
everything under the earth, moon and sun, yet we get  nothing absolutely!
Buharry asked Suntu a series of simple questions,  he went to Jupiter
and came back down to where he started o  earth without answering the
questions. At least, Suntu  eventually admitted, after the hundreth
exchange, that be was  skinning a goat and there are many ways to do
that; only if he  had said that earlier!
I asked Haruna to reconcile his stance on  Ousainou's 1996 decision to
that of his insinuation that  Halifa's move against the witch hunting
debacle was political  grandstanding; we lost that answer somewhere in
the traffic  jam.
And you, you're a stretch above the rest Ginny. Where is the  answer to 
Sis Jabou's question? The billies got it? Honestly I  felt dizzy by the 
time I read your last sentence and I still  don't remember you remotely 
answering her simple question. What  irks meosr is that you keep adding 
to heap of crap that  generalized Gambians to be so mentally inferior
that any one  would hold Halifa to be infallible. Take that crap back I 
say  one more time.
What I was expecting was for y'all (there goes another  bluff) to be
straight shooters and cut to the chase, but I see  that's asking for
too much from Suntu, Haruna and  Ginny.

-Abdoulie
Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 17,  2009, at 6:21, Ginny Quick <[log in to unmask]
(mailto:[log in to unmask]) >  wrote:

> I wasn't necessarily saying that anyone said, word for  word, that
> Halifa Sallah wasn't human.  And wasn't prone to  mistakes.  I merely
> pointed that fact out, as an aside,  because every time Halifa Sallah
> is discussed, and/or criticized  in anyway, the claws come out.  And I
> mean every time!   I almost guarantee you that if you scream Halifa
> Sallah on a  crowded list, it's bound to evoke some kinda response.
> And I also  think that some of his supporters idolize him, put him on a
>  pedestal, darn near worship him, and anyone can disagree with me  on
> this point if you want, however, from what I've seen, anyone  who
> criticizes him (rightly or wrongly), gets all kinds of stuff  flung at
> them, and we get the same old tired lecture of how great  he is for The
> Gambia, and how much he's done for the Gambian  people.  Which may or
> may not be true, that's not even the  point I'm addressing.  However,
> the unspoken rule seems to be  that criticism of Halifa Sallah is off
> limits.  Now this may,  or may not, be true.  Maybe he has, or can't do
> anything  wrong.  Maybe the criticism has taken place off list.  I
>  don't know.
>
> I'll say (once again as this seems to be  getting lost in the shuffle),
> that I commend Halifa Sallah for  speaking out and doing what he could
> to get at the truth of what  actually took place.  And I think that
> questioning his  motives, just for the sake of questioning them,
> without any proof  to substantiate any of the claims made in
> questioning his motives,  is wrong and is over the top.  OK?  Now, if
> anyone has  any substantiated claims that Sallah was acting in his own
>  self-interest, or for his own political gains, let's post hard  facts
> here, and not just mere speculation and inuendo.  Let's  not disagree
> with Halifa Sallah just for the sake of disagreeing  with him.
>
> I have wondered, though, why Halifa Sallah and  the PDOIS party has
> failed to gain traction with the Gambian  people.  And when I've asked
> this question, the inference I  get is that the Gambian people, by and
> large, are not politically  mature enough, not educated enough, and are
> too tribalistic in  their mindset, to choose what's best for them (read
> Sallah).   Now, if one thinks so low of the people they supposedly are
> trying  to fight for, the people you supposedly want to have freedom,
>  democracy, the rule of law, etc., doesn't that mean that they  should
> be allowed to support the candidate of their  choosing?  Even if it's
> not Sallah?  Is Sallah (and the  other opposition politicians as well)
> fighting for the Gambian  people, or are they fighting for their own
> political gains?   And if Sallah is so different than the other
> opposition  politicians, how so?  What has he done that say, Darboe (a
>  human rights lawyer mind you) hasn't?
>
> Sallah might be the  best thing for The Gambia (I'll steer away from
> the "sliced bread"  comparison as it might offend some), however, the
> hard fact is  that the majority of Gambians do *not* support him!  Now,
> how  can you get support from people when you infer (or right out say)
>  that the constituency that you're asking to vote for you is too  stupid
> and uneducated to do so?  Now Sallah may not have said  this himself,
> but I've heard/seen it from his supporters  enough...  And I'd
> personally not support someone who insults  my intelligence or thinks
> me stupid.
>
> It seems that  all of the opposition leaders' supporters aren't that
> much  different than Jammeh's supporters.  You criticize their  leaders,
> the claws will come out, you'll get called all kinds of  names, and be
> asked to prove (with supporting messages, footnotes,  and
> documentation) every letter, word, sentence, that you  utter.  And in
> the process of the back-and-forth, we lose  sight of what the actual
> goal is.  Perhaps if we remember  what the ultimate goal is, which is
> to restore democracy and the  rule of law to The Gambia (or at least
> that's what I thought it  was), then we can put our differences aside
> to achieve that goal  and then worry about the back and forth bickering
> later.   However, it seems that you have a group of people who would
> rather  have Jammeh in power, than to see anyone else butHalifa Sallah
> as  the next President of The Gambia.
>
> All of the opposition  leaders, imho, have done something, in their own
> way, to challenge  the current regime in power.  They'd not be
> opposition  leaders if they had not done something...  Maybe it wasn't
>  exactly what Sallah was or is doing, but if it's not, does it mean
>  that how they choose to stand up to the dictatorship is  necessarily
> "wrong", or that because they're not acting as  PDOIS/Sallah woudl act,
> that that makes them power hungry,  selfish, etc.?
>
> And this is why we can't unite!   Because some do not have respect for
> the parties they don't agree  with, they've put Sallah way up here, and
> the rest of the  opposition leaders way down here.  And will come on
> the list  and say they want a united opposition no matter what, while
>  trashing some of the opposition candidates.
>
> I'm going to  use American politics as an example again (and my
> apologies as  this seems to offend some too), but do you think Obama
> would have  gotten elected if he trashed Hillary and her supporters
> after he'd  won the primary?  Or, vice versa, i.e., what if Hillary
>  and/or her supporters had continued trashing Obama after he'd won,  and
> the democratic party had remained divided?  What I'm  trying to say is
> that for the most part, even Democrats and  Independents, for that
> matter, rallied around Obama even if they  didn't necessarily agree
> with him, in order to get rid of Bush and  not allow McCain to get
> elected.  They were able to put their  smaller differences aside and
> focus on the bigger goal of ousting  the Republicans from the White
> House as well as from many seats in  Congress.
>
> Now, if people can't even do that here on this  list, when we're
> supposedly dealing with mature and educated  people, how do we expect
> the leaders to be able to do it?   And even if the leaders were able to
> come together, what about  their supporters?
>
> You've got one person rehashing an event  that happened in 1996, per
> Darboe, and another person questioning  the supposed ulterior motives
> of a guy who, for whatever reason,  put his life on the line for asking
> questions...  i.e.  Sallah...  And this is just a waste of time and
> we're losing  site of the big picture here!
>
> My nuanced view, that many  either missed or chose to only focus on the
> critical of Sallah  parts, is that Sallah stood up and spoke out
> *more*, hear  me?  I said *more than* any of the other leaders that we
> knew  of!  I was commending him for this.  However, based not only  on
> this current conversation but past exchanges regarding  Sallah,
> criticism of him is not tolerated, even if it may be  warranted!  I
> also said that Sallah has done a lot in  educating the people in
> electoral matters (and that was missed  too), however, the fact still
> remains that PDOIS is still a small  party in The Gambia.  And the fact
> also is that many say that  he and PDOIS urged people to support an
> admittedly flawed  Constitution, the reason being that a flawed
> Constitution coudl be  changed later and it was better than no
> Constitution at all.   However, that's pretty much water under the
> bridge (just as  Darboe's seeking refuge with the Senegalese embassy
> should also be  water under the bridge), because even if we would have
> had a  perfect Constitution, Jammeh has all but ruined it, and if the
>  Freedom Newspaper *shudder* is accurate, Jammeh's fixing to *oops,
>  there's the Tennessee coming out* put up a bill making The Gambia  a
> one-party state.  What will the opposition do then?   Where will the
> endless quoting of the Constitution get anyone  then?
>
> You see, many times I tend to have a pretty nuanced  opinion about
> things.  And many I think, missed  that.
>
> Anyway...  this old argument regarding  Sallah/the opposition, in
> general, is an old and tired one, and  I'm sorry that I wasted my time,
> and others' time, getting  involved in it.
>
> Although the emotional quips of "going  back to Clarksville and telling
> the hibbies" along with my  supposedly thinking my opinions superior to
> others (but they were  didn't ya know?  'cause I'm educated and all
> that) have kept  me laughing all day...  And such an emotional reaction
> from  presumably PDOIS/Sallah supporters have proven my point, that any
>  kind of disagreement, or even mere suggestion that perhaps  something
> else different should be tried, can't be tolerated,  unless of course,
> the great and wonderful Sallah says it should be  so...  And Maybe
> Sallah is a great and wonderful leader, and  I'm just not seeing it.
>
> I've just not been the type to put  people on pedestals.  Even Obama,
> who I think, for the most  part, is doing good for this country, I
> don't always agree  with.
>
> Anyway, I've rambled on long  enough...
>
> Ginny
>
>
>
> On  4/16/09, Jabou Joh <[log in to unmask] (mailto:[log in to unmask]) >  wrote:
>> Ginny,
>>
>> Where in the responses  of those who are challenging the
>> misinformation  about
>> Halifa's intentions or anything else that is said about  him for
>> that matter,
>> have you read where  any of us have even suggested that Halifa is
>> not  human
>> and does not make mistakes?
>> Jabou  Joh
>>
>> But last I checked, he was human just like the  rest of us, he's not 
>> perfect,
>> and just like  the other opposition leaders (who by being opposition 
>>  leaders
>> and human rights lawyers, etc., have also put their  lives on the
>> line for
>> The Gambia), have  also made mistakes.
>>
>>
>>
>>  -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ginny Quick <[log in to unmask] (mailto:[log in to unmask]) >
>> To: [log in to unmask] (mailto:[log in to unmask])
>> Sent: Thu, 16  Apr 2009 10:01 am
>> Subject: Re: The Halifa Factor, what  next?
>>
>>
>>
>> You know, I could  care less *why* Halifa did what he did!  If
>> others  want to
>> question his motives than go right ahead...   However, the fact of
>> the matter
>> remains  that he went on a fact-finding mission regarding the "witch-
>>  hunts",
>> was arrested for it, and had charges brought against  him!  Where
>> were the
>> other politicians  while all of this was going on?  He was the most
>>  outspoken
>> out of all of the opposition  politicians.
>>
>>
>>
>> Having said  that, though, just like the Republicans and Democrats
>>  in this
>> country can't do anything right in the other's eyes,  so goes with the
>> various opposition parties (and their  supporters) in The Gambia.
>> If it had
>>  been Ousainou Darbo or someone else, then someone would probably be 
>> coming
>> along and questioning Ousainou's  motives
>> too.
>>
>>
>>
>> I  don't think that anyone in PDOIS is any more or less prone to
>> hero worship
>> than a supporter from any other  party, but I've always detected a
>> hint of,  I
>> can't find the right word for it, but a hint of  defensiveness and
>> and a
>> sorta cult-like  hero-worship where Halifa is concerned, though this
>> definitely  doesn't hold true for every PDOIS supporter.  And Halifa 
>> is
>> human, prone to error, just like anyone else,  though if you listen
>> to some
>> people talk,  he's the best thing since sliced bread, and if you don't
>>  support him, then there's something wrong with you, you're  stupid,
>> uneducated, or any number of  invectives.
>>
>>
>>
>>  Notwithstanding all of this, at least in the most recent case  of
>> witch-hunting, no matter why Halifa did what he did, he did  it!
>> And if
>> anyone wants to question  Halifa's motives for doing so, I'd like a
>>  little
>> more than speculation, i.e., direct quotes, hard  evidence, etc., for
>> example, to sit there and say "if Halifa  knew he'd be arrested,
>> he'd not
>> have done  what he did".  Which doesn't make sense to me because if  
>> memory
>> serves me, Halifa has been detained  before, so surely he knew that
>> his
>> actions  could well land him in detention of some  sort.
>>
>>
>>
>> Anyway, I've only  read through some of the posts as the back-and-
>> forth  was
>> giving me a headache.  And it's just the same old  "Halifa is
>> selfish/thinks
>> we're  stupid/whatever" meme against Halifa, and the "Halifa is
>> great and
>> wonderful and how dare you question  him/we all k
>> now what you're trying to do/you're trying to  tarnish the image of
>> the most
>> courageous  Gambian to ever walk the face of the earth/what you're
>>  saying
>> about Halifa is patently untrue", on the other  side.
>>
>>
>>
>>  And from my  vantage point, the true is probably somewhere in the
>>  middle of
>> those two extremes.  Halifa hs done much to  educate Gambians, has
>> done much
>> to empower  them electorally, and he has put his life on the line to 
>> stand up
>> for Gambians.  But last I checked,  he was human just like the rest
>> of us,
>> he's  not perfect, and just like the other opposition leaders (who
>> by being
>> opposition leaders and human rights  lawyers, etc., have also put
>> their lives
>> on  the line for The Gambia), have also made  mistakes.
>>
>>
>>
>>  Ginny
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
>> ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤  To
>> unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to  the
>> Gambia-L Web
>> interface at: _http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html_
(http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html)
>>  To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to:
>> _http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l_
(http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l)   To
>> contact the
>> List Management, please send  an e-mail to:
>> [log in to unmask]
(mailto:[log in to unmask])  ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
>> ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
>>  ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
>>
>>
>>  ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
>>  ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
>> To unsubscribe/subscribe or view  archives of postings, go to the
>> Gambia-L
>>  Web interface
>> at: _http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html_
(http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html)
>>
>>  To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to:
>> _http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l_
(http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l)
>>  To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
>> [log in to unmask]
(mailto:[log in to unmask])
>>  ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
>>  ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
>>
>
>  ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
>  ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
> To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives  of postings, go to the
> Gambia-L Web interface
> at:  _http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html_
(http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html)
>
>  To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to:
_http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l_
(http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l)
>  To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
> [log in to unmask]
(mailto:[log in to unmask])
>  ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
>  ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤


To unsubscribe/subscribe or view  archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L
Web interface
at: _http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html_
(http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html)

To  Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to:
_http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l_
(http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l)
To  contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
(mailto:[log in to unmask])




____________________________________
Access 350+ FREE radio stations anytime from anywhere on the web. _Get the
Radio  Toolbar_
(http://toolbar.aol.com/aolradio/download.html?ncid=emlcntusdown00000003) !
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤  To
unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L  Web interface
at: _http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html_
(http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html)
To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to:
_http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l_
(http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l)   To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
(mailto:[log in to unmask])   ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤


¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤  To
unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web  interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to:
http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact the List  Management, please send an
e-mail to: [log in to unmask]
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤

**************Access 350+ FREE radio stations anytime from anywhere on the
web. Get the Radio Toolbar!
(http://toolbar.aol.com/aolradio/download.html?ncid=emlcntusdown00000003)

¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html

To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤