Haruna, there is no chance of that. My support for UDP is after long reflections, so no small talk can shake that conviction. We are always ourselves in the UDP-UK. A band of strong characters. Suntou On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Haruna Darbo <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Suntou, > > You will be found wanting if you should listen to BuDois Sek idiots about > what you should or should not do for UDP, or any other party you desire to > support. It is a sacrosanct right of expression and association. We know > Human Rights and we can discern dictators a mile away. How can you tell me > about your friggin Pan-African Rights when you do not respect Pan-European, > Pan-American, Pan-Arab, Pan-Asian, Pan-Jewish, and Pan-Australian Rights. Go > play with yourself. > > Haruna. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: suntou touray <[log in to unmask]> > To: [log in to unmask] > Sent: Mon, Mar 22, 2010 7:44 am > Subject: Re: Fw: BBC E-mail: Rwanda accused win UK court case - PRECEDENT > FOR FORMER HIGH COURT JUDGE SAFIATOU NJIE? > > Be rude for all i care, it is part of your make-up. Your blab about > Pan-Africanism is unimportant to me. You tell us about the idea. Erase the > wrong notion pegged in your head, you are no much of an African than many > here, the truth about Kegame will be told, whether you like it or not. > Kegame just like his opponents are politicians, you haven't read the > economist Magazine yet you cheaply pass judgement. You can be rude as much > as your image portrays, I shall never be indecent. To say that Kegame is > doing good things doesn't mean people shouldn't discuss or write about areas > he needs to work on. > What kind of political mentality is that, no wonder Yahya doesn't know any > better. When he came to power, people with similar mentality like you > started praising him like God, now we want him to listen to criticism, how > can he. The U.K that you enjoy your bread and butter has incredible good > leaders, but those that mean the public, the media and the opposition > shouldn't criticise them over many issues? grow up and remember that, those > viewing the actions of Kegame from outside the party can independently make > much honest observation that the party itself. > I thought your Pan-Africanist blah huba should have make such simple logic > obvious. Kegame the new Lumumba I hope. In as much we can play our little > part in the democratisation of Gambia, i will never underestimate the > relevance of any Gambian in our struggle. However such cannot be said of > you going by your out of place comment on Rwanda. > Simply because Kegame is doing some good things, the western media should > not expose unfairness in his administration. I live in the Midlands yet i > appreciate the independent free western media, there democracy, the respect > for people' rights, and the help they extended to people whom they have no > obligation whatsoever in extending their good will to. > As for you, you try to be suspicious of the economist Magazine without > reading the piece they wrote on Rwanda. The Aids going to Rwanda is coming > from the west in larger part, there media has every right to investigate > what is happening to money. And not only that, the man in charge of taking > charge of the funds should also be scrutinise. I will continue playing my > part for the UDP, at the same time appreciate the opinions of independent > observers. > Suntou > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Modou Mboge <[log in to unmask]>wrote: > >> *"The economist Magazine has nothing to lose or gain in the articles some >> of its commentators write about Africa. Can we for once see things in their >> right context instead fancying around hanging onto our own baggage of >> partisan politics. If anyone is educated in the west, you must without a >> question read books, be lectured by western professors and enjoy the western >> way of live. What moral ground do you have to see others as less of an >> African than you are? Below is the Economist Magazine's article on Kegame >> and Rwanda. In fact the article acknowledge the level of financial >> discipline the government of Kegame is instituting, yet the other facts >> cannot be left unspoken about because one is doing something’s right and >> other major wrongs. We should delineate cheap emotion from serious issues" >> Suntou Touray* >> >> Trash, inchoate and the usual pretentious bellicose ranting from our 'Mr >> Keen Political'. What the fuck do you know about Pan-Africanism? Im all >> ears to hear proof than publications such as the Economist have no agendas >> when it comes to Africa. So just being educated in the West and reading >> Western books and enjoying Western live, one is suppose to stay mute. *What >> is a Western life style anyway? * *I will not apologise for staying in >> the West. I owe nothing to Western people or Western governments. * *Educate >> me Mr ' Keen political observer'* For a flea-like thinking clueless >> self-possessed self-righteous idiotic creature like you >> no surprise the hallucination that people want to make youn seem like >> an uncaring African? and how can i make you look like one anyway. Being the >> bloody crank you are, aren't you the one who with your confused perception >> of being critical keep lashing around folks who are doing their best to >> alieviate the lot of their brothers and sisters. I guess those who do not >> the see the way you see things are either sycophants or incapable of >> thinking for themselvess. And talking about people doing the right thing >> going home rather than staying in the West and asking question what are >> u doing here anyway?. >> And since love of Africa is so profound to you, what are u doing in the >> West Midlands? Gambia and the UDP needs your service on the ground. With >> a gift of seeing things where ordinary folk can't and being so highly >> educated, are you not wasting yourself here in the UK. Your 'acclaimed >> political insights' may well be effective back in Gambia especially in >> exposing your fancied enemy whom you dream of regularly for keeping the >> criminal APRC in power and scuppering the UDP's ascendency to the helm of >> government. Bring it on, Mr >> >> Mboge >> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:17 AM, suntou touray <[log in to unmask] >> > wrote: >> >>> The gentle man who wishes to make some us look like uncaring Africans, >>> hence not qualify in advocating anything African should take a good at >>> himself and his place of domicile. Many a times we read and hear our >>> Pan-Africanist brothers resident in Europe and America for decades lecturing >>> us about Euro-American this and that on Africans.. How self-serving these >>> brothers are. >>> >>> If you wish to take the moral high ground on Africa, then do the decent >>> thing and parachute to the West, East, South or Central Africa, then try >>> screaming from the rooftop there, hopefully people will pay attention to the >>> nonsensical out pouring of cheap emotion. Some of this So call >>> Pan-Africanist hardly ever venture into Africa, yet they feel singing >>> Pan-Africa enough in making words relevant, give us a break. >>> The economist Magazine has nothing to lose or gain in the articles some >>> of its commentators write about Africa. Can we for once see things in their >>> right context instead fancying around hanging onto our own baggage of >>> partisan politics. If anyone is educated in the west, you must without a >>> question read books, be lectured by western professors and enjoy the western >>> way of live. What moral ground do you have to see others as less of an >>> African than you are? Below is the Economist Magazine's article on Kegame >>> and Rwanda. In fact the article acknowledge the level of financial >>> discipline the government of Kegame is instituting, yet the other facts >>> cannot be left unspoken about because one is doing something’s right and >>> other major wrongs. We should delineate cheap emotion from serious issues >>> >>> >>> >>> http://www.economist.com/world/middle-east/displaystory.cfm?story_id=15622375 >>> >>> Progress and repression in Rwanda >>> Divisionists beware President Paul Kagame has improved people’s lives at >>> the expense of freedom >>> Mar 4th 2010 | NAIROBI | From *The Economist* print edition >>> Kagame, progressive and repressive >>> THE government of Rwanda is doing a lot of things right. It is pretty >>> open in its handling of aid money. Most foreign governments and charities >>> are so impressed by its detailed plans and apparent lack of corruption that >>> they are funnelling more of their aid directly through Rwanda’s government. >>> President Paul Kagame says he expects direct budget support to rise by a >>> quarter this year, to $519m. >>> The country has recovered valiantly from its year zero in 1994, when >>> 800,000 Tutsis and moderate Hutus were slaughtered. Its centralised state is >>> leading the way in economic and technological reform in the region. It is >>> improving the country’s infrastructure, education and farming, and seeks to >>> preserve its ecology. It pushes equality for women, who comprise half the >>> government and parliament. >>> On the diplomatic front, Mr Kagame has been equally successful. He has >>> sent troops to help keep the peace in Sudan’s Darfur province and elsewhere. >>> He has stood up to mighty France, blaming it, as the region’s then most >>> influential Western power, for failing to prevent the genocide. And last >>> month the French president, Nicolas Sarkozy, came to Rwanda and offered >>> something close to an apology. France, he said, had committed “grave errors >>> of judgment” before, during, and after the genocide. Questions linger about >>> the role of French special forces during the killing, as well as the fate of >>> Hutus living in France whom Rwanda wants extradited on suspicion of >>> involvement in the genocide. >>> France, for its part, has not dropped charges against some members of Mr >>> Kagame’s government who are alleged to have ordered the shooting down of a >>> French aircraft carrying Rwanda’s then president, Juvénal Habyarimana, a >>> Hutu; that action triggered the genocide. Yet both countries now appear more >>> at ease with each other. Days after Mr Sarkozy’s visit, Mr Habyarimana’s >>> widow, Agathe, was arrested near Paris (and then freed on bail) for >>> questioning over her alleged role in the genocide. French businessmen came >>> in Mr Sarkozy’s slipstream, eyeing minerals and timber in neighbouring >>> Congo, for which Rwanda is a conduit. “There is no doubt this is a >>> reconciliation,” says a Rwandan government figure. >>> Yet awkward question-marks hang over Mr Kagame and his ruling Rwandan >>> Patriotic Front. The president’s detractors say his party has not owned up >>> to killing thousands of civilians immediately after the genocide or to >>> responsibility for causing much bloodshed in Congo, which it invaded in >>> order to hunt down the *génocidaires* who had fled there. The Congolese >>> government, it may be noted, has co-operated with the Rwandans in their more >>> recent incursions into Congo. >>> Mr Kagame and his government are stifling political and press freedom in >>> advance of a presidential election due in August. He is almost certain to >>> win but evidently he is determined to secure a big majority to implement his >>> “one Rwanda” policies. Opposition parties have been forbidden to “use words >>> or facts that defame other politicians”. In practice, the government can >>> label any criticism against it as “divisionism”, which entitles it to lock >>> up the offenders. Members of the opposition say they are spied on and >>> bullied. >>> It is unclear whether the government will let the Democratic Green Party, >>> a feisty new opposition group, be registered. If not, the Greens say they >>> will back another lot, the Socialist Party-Imberakuri, which should be able >>> to run a presidential candidate. The head of a third opposition party, the >>> United Democratic Forces-Inkingi, Victoire Ingabire, says she has been >>> vilified since returning from exile in January. The government, she says, >>> has encouraged people to assault her, accusing her of being a * >>> génocidaire*. This week a former military intelligence chief, Kayumba >>> Nyamwasa, who was reported to have joined the Greens, fled Rwanda and is >>> said to be claiming asylum in South Africa. The government says he is wanted >>> on criminal charges—presumably divisionism. >>> End. >>> Going back to our own dictators corridors, What is it that his supporter >>> are fuming against us about? They are saying, the man is a dictator of >>> development and that he is fighting against corruption. He has given women >>> more power and rights. His Vice-President is a woman. At some point in his >>> government, there were more women in his government as Ministers than the >>> previous administration. All that the gentleman is promoting Kegame for, >>> Yahya Jammeh was once hail with those same things. >>> Should there be any reason for the cubing of civil rights and plurality >>> of views? >>> Is Kegame himself innocent of pumping tribal issues in politics? In fact, >>> Kegame's men in the army including the high ranking female officer play the >>> card more than many others. Check their own Google images Mr Gentleman. I >>> have seen images of the Rwandan army's latest incursion of Congo, the >>> close senior officers bragging about their prejudicial influences. These >>> things aren’t as simple as the gentleman is making it out to be. >>> Nothing should compromise tolerant co-existence, and the opposition views >>> is a key part to ensuring the population is represented at all levels. >>> Kegame's propaganda alone shouldn't be listened to at the expense of others. >>> He should be commended for lots of things, but he also needs to understand >>> that framing words against his opponent is not healthy for the future >>> stability of the country. Some of us are less of a Pan-African, however, we >>> know the working of a genuine democracy. Advocates of Europeanism live in >>> Europe. let our Pan-African folks migrate to Africa, instead of crying wolf >>> in western towns and cities. >>> Let not your bias of folks make you blind to their views. Stop been haste >>> over public issues. Take a deep breath and read the material before jumping >>> to conclusion. >>> LJ, thanks for your sober and intelligent analysis always. Long may we >>> have many non-partisan like you. Speaking the facts regardless of who it >>> come from. Saddly, folks here seems to look at names, party afilliation, >>> some ignoble little gangs before saying anything tangible. You have >>> shown to be above such petty mantra. >>> Suntou >>> Suntou >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 9:28 PM, Lamin Darbo < >>> [log in to unmask]> wrote: >>> >>>> Mboge >>>> >>>> You are absolutely right that "Four men accused of taking part in the >>>> 1994 Rwandan genocide win their High Court battle against extradition" was >>>> "strictly premised on the significance of the Legal precedence it sets for >>>> 'fugitives' claiming to be escaping persecution". Specifically, I was >>>> thinking about Justice Safiatou Njie (Justice Njie) and whether The Gambia >>>> Government is likely to succeed in having her extradited by the UK. >>>> >>>> Although her alleged crimes are not political, the whole mechanism of >>>> Gambian justice is heavily entangled in political calculations. She is not >>>> likely to get a fair trial, and as a requirement of Article 6 of the >>>> European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR), now statutorily incorporated >>>> into UK law by the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998), her chance of eluding >>>> extradition is looking good. >>>> >>>> Even as the Rwandan decision is a brilliant exemplification of the rule >>>> of law, I have to agree with you that the High Court decision was a >>>> difficult one on moral grounds. I am unsure why Rwanda did not seek their >>>> extradition for onward delivery to the International Criminal Tribunal >>>> Rwanda (ICTR), based in the Tanzanian city of Arusha. >>>> >>>> For Rwanda, it should not matter where these alleged criminals are >>>> prosecuted. The evidence is suggestive of some involvement by all four in >>>> the '94 genocide. In that case, common sense would dictate that they be >>>> prosecuted for their alleged crimes, and where found legally culpable, >>>> adequately punished. >>>> >>>> Undoubtedly, the political arm of government was keen to have them >>>> extradited, but the Judiciary blocked that wish on the explicit command of >>>> both European, and UK law. >>>> Stated differently, the High Court probably hated the outcome, but there >>>> was a clear obligation to implement the law as it is. You are right that >>>> under other circumstances, these laws can work quite well for "genuine >>>> asylum seekers". This particular decision was nevertheless quite agonising. >>>> >>>> As to Kagame, I defer to your expertise on the man, and his vision. What >>>> he must do, and this sooner than he may prefer, is to create an environment >>>> that allows his vision to incrementally mature even as he himself no longer >>>> leads Rwanda. No one person can fully develop a country, and in my view, >>>> this means that every African leader, and, or, ruler, must come to terms >>>> with his/her own mortality. Only then will a mighty continent actualise its >>>> great potential by making use of the major part of the talent at its >>>> disposal. >>>> >>>> Many thanks for a fine response, and advocacy. >>>> >>>> Do you think the Gambia's extradition request regarding Justice Njie >>>> should succeed? >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> LJDarbo >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> --- On *Sun, 21/3/10, Modou Mboge <[log in to unmask]>* wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> From: Modou Mboge <[log in to unmask]> >>>> Subject: Re: Fw: BBC E-mail: Rwanda accused win UK court case - >>>> PRECEDENT FOR FORMER HIGH COURT JUDGE SAFIATOU NJIE? >>>> To: [log in to unmask] >>>> Date: Sunday, 21 March, 2010, 17:38 >>>> >>>> >>>> LJD, >>>> >>>> I guess your sharing the judgement on the Rwandans by the High Court of >>>> the UK was strictly premised on the significance of the Legal precedence it >>>> sets for 'fugitives' claiming to be escaping persecution. I hope it is not >>>> presumptuous of me that you had in mind the Gambian female judicial employee >>>> currently in the UK apparently running away from Gambian justice *a la >>>> Jammeh when you shared the ruling.* I assume that it is no rocket >>>> science that this ruling will provide protection for the corrupt criminals, >>>> *genocidaires and their apologists* from being brought to justice where >>>> it matters *ie* where their alleged crimes were committed. >>>> >>>> It seems the so-called High Court Judges are more concerned with the >>>> human rights of vile *genocidaires* than those genuine asylum seekers >>>> whose fear of being killed and tortured in their homeland is consistently >>>> ignored and questioned and in some instances ridiculed by Western media >>>> pandering to the right-wing politics of the *"other*" coming *to take >>>> our jobs and scrounging on our generous welfare systems. *Im no lawyer >>>> but i hope this ruling also can be useful to genuine asylum seekers. >>>> >>>> >>>> Reading a response to the article you shared by our *"descerner extraordinaire >>>> on this forum" *comparing our criminal outfit headed by a deranged >>>> buffoon in the person of SHEPAD Jammeh gave me zits as well as being >>>> squirmish for a while. >>>> >>>> The realities of Gambia and Rwanda are markedly different. Kagame and >>>> Jammeh are poles apart. Kagame is a smart and patriotic leader, a >>>> visionary engaged in healing a traumatized people, one fighting a good fight >>>> in ushering in a new nation based on functioning institutions. The howling >>>> on this *divisionism by the Economist *is in my view an >>>> irrelevant unworthy distraction. Kagame should take no advise or lecturing >>>> from a rabidly anti-African magazine that once ran a feature cover story by >>>> Richard Dowden on Africa*: The Hopeless Continent. *It may be true >>>> that many an African country is marred by hunger, conflict and strife yet i >>>> have no doubt that if anything the African peoples are mostly hopeful and >>>> optimistic about the future. This may be sometimes wrongly attributed to >>>> fatalism. >>>> >>>> Of course there still remains a lot to be done in terms of democracy >>>> and human rights in Rwanda but one must acknowledge the giant strides >>>> already achieved in relation to these ideals. It is work in progress that >>>> is being managed very well under extremely difficult circumstances.* Rwanda under Kagame boast one of the most enlightened gender equality >>>> legislatures in the world.* And this goes beyond just symbolic >>>> balancing of the sexes in terms of representation (given that 33% of the >>>> Rwandan Parliament is female) in politics. Women compete and participate in >>>> all sectors of Rwanda society. There is evidence of substantive and >>>> particapatory democracy in everyday life of the ordinary Rwandan. The >>>> economy in Rwanda is booming, civil society is being built and their >>>> advocacy left, right and centre permeates in and at all levels of >>>> society. Under Kagame's Rwanda a state by all standards that failed, has >>>> emerged way ahead of many African countries in terms of health care access >>>> to its denizens. There is national health insurance for virtually all >>>> Rwandans. With Rwanda now on the right path to development and substantive >>>> participatory democracy i join the hoard of admirers wishing the Kagame >>>> juggernaut to keep steaming ahead. I do also hope that the juggernaut also >>>> destroys and annihilate all the negative forces trying to block >>>> it especially those coated in ethnicity. Ethnicity is important but not to >>>> the detriment of building a prosperous Rwandan nation that concerns herself >>>> with providing peace, prosperity and progress to its people. >>>> >>>> There exists a genuine concern by those trying to deny the *horrid >>>> genocide that took place in 1994.* Politicians such as Victoire >>>> Ingabire Umuhoza trying to play on ethnic sentiments must be reigned in. >>>> This does not mean that people should be denied the right to associate >>>> with the ethnic skirt they want to wear as long as it is not to villify or >>>> create schisms between and among their brethren and sisters. Afterall the >>>> Tutsi and Hutu are from the same family of Bantu-speaking peoples. But if >>>> not for a sad historical constructionism perpetrated by colonialists based >>>> on banal concepts such as the *Hamitic Hypothesis , the Tutsi-Hutu *dichotomous >>>> relationship might have been avoided*. *I shall not suffer the esteem >>>> lot of this forum on the nitty-gritty of this racist hypothesis which helped >>>> in the pogroms of the Tutusis in 1959 and the genocide of 1994. >>>> >>>> >>>> We have seen the shenanigans of France and some other northern >>>> governments trying to stifle the progress and development of Rwanda since >>>> the RPF came into power. I will have Kagame any day as my leader compared >>>> to the rogues we have splattered across our wounded continent irresponsibly >>>> abusing the noble ideals of democracy and human rights. >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> >>>> Mboge >>>> >>>> ** >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 7:56 AM, suntou touray <[log in to unmask]<http:[log in to unmask]> >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> LJ, reading the economies Magazine edition of last week, i can see >>>>> similar tactics in the arena of suppression of opposition views in Rwanda to >>>>> that our own mad man. Kegame's government invented a dangerous term * >>>>> 'divisionist'.* This term is label against opponents of the government >>>>> with the country's sad past. The genocidal past was trigger by tribal >>>>> sentiment, hence the divisionist concept. >>>>> It is interesting how our guys invent this sinister strategies to >>>>> suppress alternative views. Key members of the opposition are regularly >>>>> accused of being guilty of genocide, a tack one is unable to free >>>>> himself from. >>>>> Suntou >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Lamin Darbo < >>>>> [log in to unmask]<http:[log in to unmask]> >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> --- On *Fri, 19/3/10, LJD <[log in to unmask]<http:[log in to unmask]> >>>>>> >* wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> From: LJD <[log in to unmask]<http:[log in to unmask]> >>>>>> > >>>>>> Subject: BBC E-mail: Rwanda accused win UK court case >>>>>> To: [log in to unmask]<http:[log in to unmask]> >>>>>> Date: Friday, 19 March, 2010, 0:08 >>>>>> >>>>>> LJD saw this story on the BBC News website and thought you >>>>>> should see it. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ** Rwanda accused win UK court case ** >>>>>> Four men accused of taking part in the 1994 Rwandan genocide win their >>>>>> High Court battle against extradition >>>>>> < http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/em/fr/-/1/hi/uk/7989534.stm > >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ** BBC Daily E-mail ** >>>>>> Choose the news and sport headlines you want - when you want them, all >>>>>> in one daily e-mail >>>>>> < http://www.bbc.co.uk/email > >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ** Disclaimer ** >>>>>> The BBC is not responsible for the content of this e-mail, and >>>>>> anything written in this e-mail does not necessarily reflect the BBC's views >>>>>> or opinions. Please note that neither the e-mail address nor name of the >>>>>> sender have been verified. >>>>>> >>>>>> If you do not wish to receive such e-mails in the future or want to >>>>>> know more about the BBC's Email a Friend service, please read our frequently >>>>>> asked questions. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/help/4162471.stm >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ To >>>>>> unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web >>>>>> interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html >>>>>> To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: >>>>>> http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact >>>>>> the List Management, please send an e-mail to: >>>>>> [log in to unmask]<http:[log in to unmask]>¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ To >>>>> unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web >>>>> interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html >>>>> To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: >>>>> http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact >>>>> the List Management, please send an e-mail to: >>>>> [log in to unmask]<http:[log in to unmask]>¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ >>>>> >>>> >>>> ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ To >>>> unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web >>>> interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html >>>> To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: >>>> http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact >>>> the List Management, please send an e-mail to: >>>> [log in to unmask]<http:[log in to unmask]>¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ >>>> >>>> >>>> ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ To >>>> unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web >>>> interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html >>>> To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: >>>> http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact >>>> the List Management, please send an e-mail to: >>>> [log in to unmask]¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ >>>> >>> >>> ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ To >>> unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web >>> interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html >>> To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: >>> http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact >>> the List Management, please send an e-mail to: >>> [log in to unmask]¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ >>> >> >> ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ To >> unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web >> interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html >> To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: >> http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact the >> List Management, please send an e-mail to: >> [log in to unmask]¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ >> > > ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ To > unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web > interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html > To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: > http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact the > List Management, please send an e-mail to: > [log in to unmask]¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ > ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ To > unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web > interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html > > To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: > http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact the > List Management, please send an e-mail to: > [log in to unmask]¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ > ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to: [log in to unmask] ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤