uk call centre - scheduled flights (flight numbers starting ZB)
08719 40 50 40 (calls cost 10p per min plus network extras)
Mon-Fri 08:00-18:00 (UK time) i
Sat & Sun 09:00-17:30 (UK time)
Bank Holiday Monday 09.00-17.30 (UK time)
Call for flight reservations (flight numbers starting ZB) and general booking enquiries including time, date and name changes. Due to increased demand you may be required to queue.
switchboard
0871 2250250 (calls cost 10p per minute plus network extras)
Mon-Fri 09:00-17:00 (UK time)Call for the Monarch head office switchboard.
I have pasted in the relevant bits of the flyer people made Mass Maki Mbye and Ya Sai Jeng,
Flight number ZB5394, direct from Gatwick to Banjul, capital of the Gambia.
And this is a letter/script compiled from the flyer people wrote last time Mass and Ya Sai were detained and facing removal
and from similiar letters/scripts I have used before.
For if you don't know what to say on the phone/in an email...
I am writing/speaking in regards to flight ZB5394, due to leave at 09:15 hours on Tuesday 16th October from Gatwick to Banjul, Gambia. The flight is due to carry Mass Maki Mbye and Ya Sai Jeng,.
They are asylum seekers who were politically active in Gambia and are being returned against their will.
Both in their sixties, they have made the best of their situation here in Bristol and have a wide and diverse circle of friends who respect and love them.
Both Mass and Ya Sai have been active members of an opposition party since it was formed in the 1990s and Mass was twice detained, threatened and tortured before they left.
Both Mass and Ya Sai attended a demonstration outside Downing Street over the recent presidential elections, at which they were probably photographed for the Gambian Embassy.
THESE TWO FACTS PUT THEM AT VERY HIGH RISK ON RETURN.
AMNESTY SAY THEY ON NO ACCOUNT SHOULD BE RETURNED. So do the Sene-Gambian Human Rights Defence group, and the members of their party in exile, the UDP(UK). SO DO WE at Bristol Refugee Rights, Bristol Defend Asylum Seekers, and Bristol No Borders.
They are awaiting a report from Amnesty International which will provide further evidence for their asylum claim. UKBA are attempting to forcibly remove them without allowing them the opportunity to have this new evidence heard in court.
In carrying someone who is being taken, most likely in a state of extreme distress and fear, by force and with UKBA staff enforcing their cooperation, you
will not only be allowing this elderly couple to be brutalised, but also exposing the airline staff and customers to this situation. There have been many reported incidents of violence against people in this situation, and the recent high profile case of Jimmy Mubenga, in which the victim died, witnessed by traumatised passengers, four of whom testified as witnesses in the subsequent trial against his killers.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/oct/18/jimmy-mubenga-death-three-men-arrested
The health and safety considerations would also become more complex. An atmosphere of panic and
trauma can create unpredictable behaviour from other passengers. I am aware of several cases where passengers have become aware that a flight is carrying someone against their will into a dangerous situation and have acted to prevent the flight by refusing to fasten their seatbelts or otherwise disrupting the flight.
The link below is to an article describing this happening
http://changezimbabwe.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2501&Itemid=2
I am sure you can imagine the expense and disruption, not to mention the damage to your reputation if something like this were to happen this Thursday.
The UK's asylum system does not allow many people a fair hearing because of cuts to legal aid, difficulties in finding solicitors to represent people,
bias, ignorance and
political pressure to hit arbitrary targets regardless of the merits of individual cases. By providing deportation flights, Monarch Airways would be implicating themselves in this injustice.
XL Airways changed their policy and refused to take any more deportations on the grounds that they did not want to be implicated in a breach of human rights.