I will still vote for PDOIS if we had a level playing field.  I like the
message.

Mboge

Nyang, sorry for sending the earlier message to your private mail box,
thought i was responding to the Gambia-L list.

On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Modou Mboge <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> I will still vote for PDOIS if we had a level playing field.  I like the
> message.
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Modou Nyang <[log in to unmask]>wrote:
>
>> *PDOIS’ NEWYEAR MESSAGE*
>> *ISSUED BY HALIFA SALLAH 1 JANUARY 2013*
>>  The year 2012 is behind us. The year 2013 has commenced its historical
>> recordings. We have a right to act as we wish. History has the duty to
>> record our actions and posterity shall be the judge. It is now time to take
>> stock. 2012 has been a most dramatic year. It is full of complexities and
>> uncertainties. Never in the history of the country since the coup days have
>> Gambians been exposed to more unsettling and disturbing news than the ones
>> which came to their notice in 2012. The reaction to the uncertainties had
>> been varied.
>> By mid-year many Gambians sat at the edge of their seat as operation Bull
>> dozer was unleashed leading to raids that resulted in the arbitrary arrest,
>> detention, and degrading treatment of many youths and non Gambians
>> alike, from Banjul to Koina, provoking some to leave the Gambia for
>> safer Haven elsewhere. Many poor people and non Gambians were outraged
>> and we came to their aid by exposing the unconstitutionality of the
>> operation and its potential to ignite the flight of investment.
>> Interestingly enough at the very instance when Operation Bull Dozer was
>> being promoted as a mechanism for fighting crime, on Tuesday 7 August, 2012
>> some armed men on board two military jeeps without number plates and
>> dressed in combat gears and war style masks stormed the Village of
>> Karunorr, in the FoniKansala District of Western Region, summoned villagers
>> to a meeting, identified Wuyeh Colley and Enor Colley and immediately
>> whisked them away towards the Casamance side of the border. After some time
>> gun shots were heard and when the villagers crossed the border they were
>> found dead in a pool of blood. We did not hesitate to expose such a heinous
>> act but Operation Bull Dozer never caught the murderers. We questioned how
>> much protection the people of Foni have, being situated just three
>> kilometres from the Casamance border. We called for greater protection of
>> the lives and security of the people near the border and the arrest of the
>> murderers.
>> One could also recall the dragging of company owners, lawyers, doctors,
>> accountants and consultants before the tax commission and to police
>> stations. We indicated that the country needed a tax review commission
>> before the establishment of a tax recovery commission. We argued that many
>> businesses are run on a hand to mouth basis and would go under water if
>> forced to carry a heavy tax burden. We indicated that the absence of
>> unemployment benefits and other state sponsored welfare services have
>> compelled many poor family members to depend on the profits of enterprises
>> for survival. Needless to say, many businesses are now closing down or
>> reduced to one person operations to avoid overhead cost such as rent,
>> secretarial services, watchmen, messengers, phone bills, electricity and
>> water supply. There is evidence of divestiture of private enterprises
>> and the relocation of some to Guinea Bissau. There is also flight of
>> capital that had impacted on the economy in the form of the depreciation of
>> the dalasi against the major currencies of the world and the concomitant
>> increases in prices, reduction of charitable initiatives and the growth of
>> poverty.
>> The dust was yet to settle when the President swore to execute death row
>> prisoners after a moratorium on the death penalty lasting for 31 years.
>> Reports of execution of nine death row prisoners led to international
>> inquiry and its confirmation outraged the sensibilities of many and gave
>> rise to a thunderous international and National outcry. We did not hesitate
>> to expose the lapses in procedure and the lack of adherence to the
>> standards of best practice in the treatment of Death row prisoners. We
>> visited the families and amplified the concerns expressed that they had no
>> contact with the prisoners to get their last will and testament before
>> their execution and had no opportunity to carry out traditional and
>> religious rites associated with the burial and moaning of the dead. We
>> argued that the outcome of the sufferance of punishment is the restoration
>> of innocence. Hence those killed deserve respect and serenity in the
>> conduct of their burials.
>> We also explained why we were opposed to the death penalty. We made it
>> very clear how inhumane we would make an individual by assigning him or her
>> no other job but to be a killer for the state. We concluded that a humane
>> society will have no one employed as a killer for an income. Hence the
>> severest punishment for death row prisoners should be life imprisonment.
>> We contributed our quota in amplifying the concerns of all human rights
>> defenders regarding the executions. The general outcry, at home and abroad,
>> compelled the government to engage in damage control by welcoming elders in
>> turn to show solidarity as well request for suspension of the killings
>> which was in line with the unequivocal demand of those opposed to the
>> execution. The execution of two Senegalese Nationals despite the appeal of
>> their government led to a diplomatic rift between the government of Senegal
>> and The Gambia which culminated in the opening up of the Senegalese media
>> to Gambian dissidents and political activists of all shades. This gave rise
>> to a proclamation made by The National Transition Council of the Gambia led
>> by ShiekhSidiaBayo aiming at overthrowing the government of the Gambia
>> within weeks. Subsequently, the date to begin armed insurrection was pushed
>> to 10th November 2012. This raised the political temperature in the Gambia
>> as some people anticipated an armed insurrection. November 10th has passed
>> and gone without any armed insurrection but a subtle security alert still
>> remains. We did not become alarmed by the treat nor did we dismiss it. We
>> took it seriously and examined it with realistic lenses. We examined
>> whether NTCG was a government in exile with its Political, Diplomatic and
>> Military wing and with international backers who are ready to break
>> relation with the current Government and give full recognition, arms,
>> ammunition, transports, uniforms, food and other logistical support to
>> enable them to prosecute their threat or was a mere group of dissidents
>> utilising a terrain supportive of Gambian dissidents to issue threats that
>> had no international backing. We did our findings and concluded that the
>> Senegalese Government was not poised to back an armed invasion of the
>> Gambia but would not interfere with the activities of Gambian dissidents as
>> retaliatory measures against the execution of the two Senegalese citizens.
>> Hence it is not strange for DrSedatJobe and DrAmadouScattredJanneh to use
>> Senegal as a staging ground to call for the security forces to arrest
>> President Jammeh and hand him over to the people as if they have people in
>> the security forces who would implement their call for them.
>> In our view war requires fighters, weapons, food and logistics such as
>> trucks to transport fighters and a safe Haven to retreat to when the going
>> gets rough. We concluded that only Senegal and the International Community
>> could provide such facilities to NTCG. Since such facilities were not
>> available at the time of issuing the threat we cautioned against false
>> expectation. The only option envisaged was an invasion without any support
>> of any Government or the international community which would amount to
>> adventurism. We cautioned against adventurism to avoid the scenario like
>> the Farafenni and Kartong attacks which may lead to loss of life without
>> effecting any change. History has again proven that we read the situation
>> with accuracy.
>> In the interim, three months before the end of the financial year
>> Government introduced a Supplementary Appropriation Bill amounting to
>> D470.7 million. The bill revealed expenditure of public funds prior to
>> authorisation by the National Assembly. For example, Taiwan President’s
>> visit approximately did cost 8 Million dalasi which the Government strove
>> to recover through the Supplementary Appropriation Act. The bill allocated
>> 101.6 Million dalasi to the office of President out of which 43 Million was
>> allocated for maintenance cost of state Aircraft for the remaining three
>> months of the year after a sum of 25 Million had already been allocated
>> and consumed within 9 Months. 6 Million Dalasi was allocated for
>> rehabilitation of the old office of the Governor of CRR instead of
>> allocating it to build a new facility. Expenditures like these over the
>> years have caused government to spend beyond its earnings thus leading to
>> domestic borrowing through treasury bills. This is why the domestic debt
>> rose to 10.2 Billion dalasi in 2012 while the external debt stock in 2011
>> rose to 400 Million dollars or 12 billion dalasi, giving a total debt
>> burden of over 22 Billion dalasi.
>> It is therefore no surprise that the debt service charges are almost
>> equal to the total salaries and wages of personnel. The estimated budget
>> for wages and Salaries in 2013 stands at One Billion, Eight Hundred and
>> Fifty Million, Seven Hundred and Seven Thousand and Eighty Five Dalasi
>> (D1,850,707,085) while National Debt Service charges amount to One Billion
>> Seven Hundred and one Million four Hundred and thirty seven thousand, four
>> hundred and thirty four dalasi (D1,701,437,434.). The debt burden is
>> preventing any significant increase in wages, salaries and employment.
>> Directors on grade 11 receive approximately 6000 dalasi monthly and the
>> middle income earners receive less than 4000 dalasi monthly which would be
>> consumed if they purchase a bag of rice monthly and are spending 100 dalasi
>> daily for fish and other condiments. They would not be able to afford a
>> kilo of meat. Cost of living is far below the earning capacity of most
>> employees.
>> The increase in the expenditure on imports without an equivalent increase
>> in earnings from exports has given rise to a worsening of the trade
>> deficits and the depreciation of the dalasi against other international
>> currencies.
>> Instead of acknowledging the contraction of the domestic economy and
>> create the environment conducive to enlarged investment in the productive
>> base the executive decided to issue an order to determine the value of the
>> currency by executive design. This led to the freezing of the currency
>> market as many foreign exchange dealers refused to buy or sell for fear of
>> losing money. We indicated to the government that its attempt to interfere
>> with the market will lead to the collapse of many enterprises, the
>> contraction of remittances and investments, and the flight of foreign
>> exchange dealers across the Senegalese border, the scarcity of foreign
>> exchange, the reduction of importers, the scarcity of goods and rising in
>> prices. The end result of the attempt of the office of the President to
>> determine the exchange rate of the dalasi against foreign currencies led to
>> an immediate freeze of the exchange market just as we predicted and the
>> contraction of business activities. The IMF had to intervene to assert that
>> the executive directive has been disruptive to the foreign exchange market
>> and urged the Central Bank to implement a market determined foreign
>> exchange policy. Three days before the IMF made its position known Imam
>> Baba Leigh was arrested and driven to a detention centre.
>>  DEFENDING FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS
>>  PDOIS recognises that a Republic is inconceivable without a sovereign
>> citizenry each of whom must have equal power and say in electing
>> representatives and in deciding on major National issues through referendum
>> and debates in the public space. This is why PDOIS considers rights of
>> individuals as inviolable and inalienable. PDOIS has striven to be
>> consistent and constant in combating abuse of authority and impunity. All
>> Gambians have a duty to defend the constitution and the courts are to
>> enforce its provisions. This is clearly stipulated in section 6 subsection
>> (2) of the Constitution which states, among other things, that “All
>> citizens of the Gambia have the right and the duty at all times to defend
>> the Constitution….”
>> In the case of Imam Baba Leigh section 19 of the constitution states that
>> he should have access to a lawyer within three hours of detention; that he
>> should be charged and taken before a court within 72 hours or be released;
>> that he should be presumed innocent while in custody and by implication,
>> should have access to visitors, food and clothing before being convicted of
>> any crime. We have therefore been contributing our quota in exposing his
>> plight and before that, the case of Alhaji Ismaila Manjang and Imam Ba
>> KawsuFofana, so that the state authorities would come to realise that
>> impunity erodes the integrity of a state and is counterproductive and
>> adverse to the attainment of national self–esteem. Public outcry continues
>> to grow and will intensify as long as Imam Baba Leigh is kept under
>> detention without trial. The public and the government should be alert to
>> the fact that violation of Human Rights has its economic cost. Accusing
>> donors of double standards cannot be a substitute to the cancellation of
>> grants meant to promote infrastructural or agricultural development. In
>> 2013 project grants are anticipated to amount to approximately two billion
>> dalasi. Bilateral grants amount to 162 Million Dalasi and Multilateral
>> grants amount to 1.87 billion dalasi. The European Union should engage in
>> its political dialogue with the Gambia Government in January 2013. What
>> explanation will the Government give for Imam Baba Leigh’s disappearance
>> even if he is later found to be in a good state of Health? Gambia therefore
>> stands to lose a great deal if it has a government which is unwilling to
>> adhere to fundamental rights and freedoms and standards of best practice in
>> democratic governance. PDOIS certainly would not be found wanting in
>> showing respect for fundamental rights and adhering to the standards of
>> best practice if it were in a position of leadership.
>> We therefore hope that the Government will release Imam Baba Leigh and
>> abandon the practice of illegal detention without trial. It should be added
>> that in a mature democracy government should listen to the people or be
>> punished by the people during elections for honouring their concerns with
>> gross disregard. This is the best way of teaching Political leaders the
>> virtues of democratic governance. One could see how political leaders
>> became mindful of the concerns of the people during the debate on the US
>> budget in Congress. Any party which is seen to cause delay that increases
>> the hardship of the people is likely to be punished by the people in
>> subsequent elections. This is a lesson political parties and people in the
>> Gambia should learn to further build participatory democracy.
>>  *DEFENDING THE REPUBLIC AND THE SOVEREIGNTY OF THE PEOPLE*
>> PDOIS recognises the importance of having a sovereign people who are
>> empowered to become the architects of their own destiny. This is why it has
>> always been willing to join alliances whose objective is to form a non
>> partisan transitional government aiming to put a president in office who
>> would serve for one term in order to build a democratic constitution,
>> institutions and institutional practices that would free the people from
>> all forms of oppression, coercion and intimidation and further create a
>> level ground for multi party contest without taking sides. We are
>> convinced that a Republic does not deserve a government that is not derived
>> from the consent of an informed and free people ,who freely cast their
>> votes without inducement or intimidation, on the basis of informed opinions
>> and conscience to promote truth and justice; liberty and prosperity.
>> This is why PDOIS did not accept to form a coalition government with the
>> coup makers in 1994. This is why it gave up its National Assembly seats in
>> 2005, instead of exploiting the political advantages it enjoyed in the 2002
>> National Assembly elections to form NADD and did forgo putting up a
>> Presidential candidate to form the United Front in 2011. It is the same
>> desire to have a National Assembly with more than 14 opposition members to
>> be able to block any negative amendments of the constitution and even have
>> an opposition majority to be able to contain the excesses of the executive
>> and block any negative bill, that led us to join the group of six aimed at
>> effecting electoral reform rather than struggle for few PDOIS seats. The
>> fact that out of just approximately 154 000 voters who participated in the
>> National Assembly elections the ruling party could only poll approximately
>> 80, 000 votes against the 60000 plus polled by Independent candidates
>> confirm that with the restoration of the second round of voting and a level
>> ground for multi party contest free from the use of public resources and
>> public servants and the security apparatus to support the ruling party
>> change through the ballot box is inevitable. This is why PDOIS has joined a
>> coalition of concerned persons comprising opposition parties and
>> Independent candidates to invite Reverend Jesse Jackson to mediate to
>> effect electoral reform.
>> With the restoration of second round of voting and the elimination of all
>> restriction to the right to elect and be elected a genuine multi party
>> system would be restored and political parties could put up their own
>> candidates without forming alliances until the people decide which two
>> candidates could contest in the second round. This is the way forward and
>> we call on the Government in particular and all other stakeholders in
>> general to give full support to this initiative so that before the 18th of
>> February the mediation efforts would be in full bloom.
>>  *TWO STATE ONE PEOPLE*
>> PDOIS advocates for the policy of two states one people in our relation
>> with Senegal. It subscribes to the policy of harmonization of civil,
>> political, economic, social, cultural and ecological instruments, policies,
>> Institutions, plans and programmes between two countries to promote the
>> liberty and prosperity of the people. We have made it clear that cross
>> border trade is already taking place at the formal and informal level
>> through the weekly markets known as “lumo.” This trade and other economic
>> activities should be complemented by the building of SeneGambian Air road,
>> sea and ports networks and infrastructure. In short, it is not strategic to
>> merely builda bridge across the Gambia river. PDOIS has said that this
>> should be linked to the transformation of the project into a bridge/ports
>> project so that the Southern part of Senegal and beyond will be served by
>> the main port in Banjul and another at YelliTenda/BambaTenda crossing.
>> Casamance is rich in natural and mineral resources which are yet to be
>> fully harnessed with international support and cooperation. The area should
>> be transformed into a zone of peace, liberty and prosperity.
>> We welcome the handing over of captured Senegalese soldiers by MFDC
>> under MrSalifuSarjo and his call for “the international community to get
>> together to assist them to find a definitive end to the suffering of their
>> people rather than continuing to be silent on this matter.”
>> We intend to play our role to see a definitive end to the conflict which
>> has been blooming since 1982.
>> We have listened Mr Salifu Sarjo very carefully and have come to the
>> conclusion that the MFDC under him is yet to be a fully fledged National
>> Liberation movement. MFDC is still functioning as an armed opposition
>> rather than a Government waiting to be recognized. A liberation movement
>> must have a cabinet and must start delivering services like a state in the
>> areas they have liberated. It must have a Political Bureau that conducts
>> political and diplomatic relations and a Military wing that is subjected to
>> political control. The political bureau must serve like a Cabinet of
>> Ministers aiming to render services to the people.
>> In our view, African Countries have already agreed to accept the colonial
>> borders as the borders of Independent African States. The argument of
>> Reverend Diamacoune Senghore and the MFDC is that Casamance fell under a
>> different colonial experience from Northern Senegal and therefore has a
>> right to self determination and Independence. Some historians who have
>> examined the issue maintain that the agreement between France and the UK
>> which established the borders of the Gambia also established the boundaries
>> of Senegal in relation to the Gambia. We will deal with this issue in a
>> statement on Casamance. At this point, the Government of Senegal and Salifu
>> Sarjo should agree on a peace and development plan which would lead to
>> autonomous administration of Casamance for a period of ten years while
>> historical records are properly consulted to get to the facts about the
>> colonial history of the region. If after ten years of peace and development
>> the historical facts favours Reverend Diamacoune’ s argument a federal
>> system would be instituted. If research favours the current status quo that
>> Casamance is an integral part of Senegal then the autonomous region concept
>> would remain. This is the way forward.
>>  *PDOIS AS AN ALTERNATIVE*
>> PDOIS has emphasised that the lack of development of the productive base
>> of the Gambian economy and the lack of consolidation of the sovereignty of
>> the people have resulted in the dwarfing of the civil, political, economic,
>> social, cultural and ecological development of the country giving rise to
>> deficits in liberty and prosperity.
>> We have given convincing arguments that the starting point of reversing
>> the downward trend is to accumulate sovereign National Wealth by harnessing
>> the wealth that could be derived from mines like those in Sanyang and any
>> natural gas or oil deposits to provide social services, infrastructural
>> development and public sector investment.
>> We have also shown that over 1.5 Billion dollars is traded annually in
>> our foreign exchange market and over 1.7 Billion dalasi come in as
>> remittances. Hence there is great potential for private sector and
>> public/private investments. The same goes with cooperative micro-financial
>> institutions and their potential for financial, producer and consumer
>> cooperatives. Such institutions could help purchase the produce of the
>> farmers at near world market price rates to eradicate rural poverty. The
>> weekly cross border market activities could also be supported to address
>> rural poverty. This is how we intend to win the battle against poverty to
>> ensure prosperity.
>> Unemployment is now a social menace. Remittances are not a substitute for
>> self determined development. The 227,668 children in our lower basic
>> schools, the 75000 students in our upper Basic Schools and the 36 000
>> students in our High Schools n add up to over 338000 young people who are
>> put in the street for employment every 12 years . Many of them are getting
>> desperate and are taking the back way in search of greener pastures. We
>> recently had to publicise the plight of some of them who were tortured and
>> subjected to ill treatment in Libya to draw the attention of Amnesty
>> International and other right defenders to facilitate their protection and
>> repatriation. Development is a priority to save our young people from death
>> , degradation, dehumanization and privation.
>> In the area of liberty, we stand for the creation of a Human Rights
>> Commission and an Independent Electoral Commission whose members are
>> appointed by a Special Service Commission on the basis of merit and
>> subjected to confirmation by the National Assembly. Such people could only
>> be removed by a tribunal headed by a retired Judge.
>> We will empower Unions, Civic associations of the differently able,
>> youth, women and other Associations of Human Right defenders to help shape
>> public policy and defend rights. The state media shall be utilised to
>> promote civic education. A term limit of two four year terms shall be
>> introduced for the Presidency, Speaker of the National Assembly, Mayors of
>> Municipalities, Members of Commissions and Councils and Board members to
>> prevent any building of empires.
>> We will introduce village Councils, District Councils and Regional
>> Councils to be responsible for the development of each jurisdiction.
>> Governors would be replaced by Regional Permanent Secretaries responsible
>> for coordinating relation between central government and regional, district
>> and village administration. The role of customary leadership would be
>> restricted to alternative dispute resolution activities, recording of
>> births and deaths and membership in advisory committees for the area.
>> All service men and women would be loyal to the Republic and the
>> Sovereign people and would be trained to be protectors of lives, rights and
>> properties.
>>  *CONCLUSION*
>> Since its birth in the first Republic PDOIS has at least succeeded in
>> communicating a simple message to the Gambian people that the wellbeing of
>> their homes and families, their liberty and prosperity are connected with,
>> dependent on and determined by the ways and means the world outside
>> their compound gates is managed and who is assigned the responsibility
>> of managing it. We have also made it unequivocally clear that it is the
>> sovereign right and authority of the people to decide who should manage the
>> affairs of their country. Once this lesson is lost to any Gambian such a
>> person should see himself or herself as an alien in his or her own country,
>> instead of a free sovereign citizen of an Independent homeland.
>> In short, we have spared no effort in repeating, like a broken record,
>> that it is the world outside the homes which provides a source of income
>> and the essential services and facilities which bring about liberty and
>> prosperity to each. This world requires its policy makers, planners,
>> managers, administrators and public trustees who are to be assigned the
>> responsibility of mobilising the requisite resources to build the necessary
>> instruments, institutions and infrastructure to bring about self determined
>> development. This should be the fundamental objective of a state borne out
>> of the struggle of African colonies for self determination and
>> Independence. PDOIS has left no stone unturned in conducting civic
>> education to explain the nature of the sovereign Republic which the
>> struggle for self determination and Independence engendered comprising a
>> community of sovereign citizens in whom the sovereignty of the state
>> resides, to whom power belongs, from whom power is derived, in whose
>> interest and for whose liberty and prosperity power is exercised by
>> political trustees. The Gambia, therefore, should be in the hands of the
>> Gambian people. A person or group could only usurp their power if thepeople
>> abdicate their responsibilities as sovereign citizens. We could only be
>> subjugated as a people if we are our own enemies, if we fail to unite as
>> one people into a sovereign community of equal, free , conscious and
>> indomitable citizens who know their rights and national and civic duties
>> as citizens.
>> Three decades of civic education should be enough enlightenment and
>> people do tell us that now there is no need for civic education, arguing
>> that that if the people still do not understand then they are deliberately
>> unwilling to learn very simple and clear lessons in order to take charge of
>> their destiny.
>> Despite the temptation to accept such a premise and abandon the people to
>> be strangulated by the arms of blind destiny we in PDOIS could hear the
>> silent voices crying of powerlessness and helplessness. That is what
>> continues to remind us that the right of our people to a dignified
>> existence in liberty and prosperity, which we have struggled for all our
>> lives and for which we have committed ourselves to go to prison and die
>> for, has not been attained since the declaration of Independence.
>> Hence as we enter a New year, we have the duty to take stock how far we
>> have gone in building the sovereign Community of sovereign and empowered
>> citizens whose rights are respected and whose prosperity is ensured.
>> During 2012 PDOIS had tried to exercise its duty to scrutinise,
>> criticise, restrain and rectify or reverse any abuse of power, on one hand
>> and advance alternatives to the existing instruments, policies, plans
>> and programmes, on the other hand, to convince the people that it could
>> provide better leadership in managing the affairs of the country. We
>> therefore hope that the Gambian people will take stock of what was done by
>> the ruling party and those aiming to unseat it in 2012 and then lay bare
>> demands and expectations for 2013.
>> Another year of battle for liberty and prosperity has started. PDOIS will
>> not rest on its laurels. We will be among the people at the forefront to
>> clear the scrubs and thorns to facilitate the onward march for unrestrained
>> liberty, unparalleled dignity and sustained prosperity.
>> In this New Year PDOIS calls on all to Keep Hope Alive and give
>> solidarity for ever to create an oppression and impunity free world.
>> The end
>> ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ To
>> unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web
>> interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
>>
>> To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to:
>> http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact
>> the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
>> [log in to unmask]¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
>>
>
>


¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html

To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤