Demba, I hope to see you in Raleigh, if you will make it Inshallah. On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Demba Baldeh <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Che, > > May be it is time to switch allegiance my friend. You know your babili > mansa don't care and may have been reading your lines on > the delusional behavior. > > At least we will embrace you with open arms as a brother seeking > redemption... but first, I will have to ask for permission for you to join > the struggle as is the new norm at the L.. > > Thanks > > Demba > > > On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Y Jallow <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> Bro Ansu: >> >> It is refreshing to see your lines. On one end, I do agree with Cherno >> that we missed your contributions online. We look forward to your well >> researched contributions as the assignments losens up. Good luck with all >> the positive endeavors. >> >> Cherno: >> I do not know of any that don't read you. I try to read all submissions >> base on the time I have. Part of why your own is not exuseable is because >> you are both an educated person and exposed to Western democracy/freedom. >> It is not like you do not know. There is nothing wrong provoking debates >> and offering criticisms....and you've been doing that. on the other hand, >> you know well the worry and concern I have in your contributions. >> >> Thanks LJD. I honestly do respct his opinion and his right to say it. >> >> Best, >> Yero. >> >> ------------------------------ >> To: [log in to unmask] >> Subject: Re: [>-<] RE: [G_L] THE LAST STANDING PILLAR OF GAMBIAN POLITICS >> - I WISH LAWYER DARBO CAN EMULATE HIM >> From: [log in to unmask] >> Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 08:55:53 -0400 >> >> >> Yero: >> >> This man is not only a fraud but a lousy economist. Remember his GDP >> v GNI nonsense until he was humiliated by Matarr? If I were you, I would >> ignore him for being the incompetent buffoon he is. I am extremely busy >> on assignment and on the road most of the time. I will resume my >> contributions to Gainako and other online papers when time permits. Until >> then, please ignore Fankung and concentrate on the main prize - which is >> kicking that SOB out of State House. Bye for now. >> >> A. Koroma >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Y Jallow <[log in to unmask]> >> To: a Gambia-L <[log in to unmask]>; MightyPost < >> [log in to unmask]> >> Sent: Wed, May 8, 2013 8:25 am >> Subject: RE: [>-<] RE: [G_L] THE LAST STANDING PILLAR OF GAMBIAN POLITICS >> - I WISH LAWYER DARBO CAN EMULATE HIM >> >> Cherno: & huh, this was your last signature just incase you forget. >> Lest we are seeing a born again 'Fankung Fankung' which as far as I >> followed you've not announced here yet and not that you even owe us that >> announcement anyway. I think this wasn't well structured Cherno and this is >> not fun. When people are dealing with so many delicate issues, some of the >> childish games and distractions are not necessary, especially at this hour. >> Debates are welcome with of course different opinions. >> >> Find below your last known signature and please tell me what is >> difference since then.. >> >> [*GOD BLESS SHEIKH PROFESSOR ALHAGIE YAHYA AJJ JAMMEH* >> *(PRESIDENT FOR LIFE.)* >> *GOD BLESS THE GAMBIA* >> *GOD BLESS APRC* >> *DOWN WITH THE FAILED OPPOSITION]* >> ** >> ** >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> From: [log in to unmask] >> To: [log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask] >> Subject: [>-<] RE: [G_L] THE LAST STANDING PILLAR OF GAMBIAN POLITICS - I >> WISH LAWYER DARBO CAN EMULATE HIM >> Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 07:01:27 -0500 >> >> Cherno: >> >> Why can't you emulate him as well? Until recently, you were the only one >> using the psuedo name 'Fankung Fankung' with a signature damning Gambia's >> opposition to which Halifa is a consortium of. As Koto Alagi indicated, and >> out of great respect for you, it is just hard to know which side you >> belong. That is your political opinion for all I care. >> >> See a friend told me that the APRC like those that divide their >> opponents. I am not saying you are one of them, but to think that people >> are simple on some and hard on others as you've been threading lately is >> outright not accurate. >> >> Yero >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 07:47:24 -0400 >> From: [log in to unmask] >> Subject: [G_L] THE LAST STANDING PILLAR OF GAMBIAN POLITICS - I WISH >> LAWYER DARBO CAN EMULATE HIM >> To: [log in to unmask] >> >> Halifa Sallah writes to Hamat Bah >> <http://thepoint.gm/africa/gambia/article/halifa-sallah-writes-to-hamat-bah#map> >> Africa <http://thepoint.gm/africa/news> » Gambia<http://thepoint.gm/africa/gambia/news> >> Wednesday, May 08, 2013 >> *Hamat Bah >> **Leader >> **NRP >> * >> *Dear Mr Bah, >> *On Your Press Conference and an Invitation for National Debate or >> Joint Press Conference on the Way Forward By Opposition Parties. >> I have been asked by the grassroots supporters of our party to respond to >> comments you made at your Press Conference which merit clarification. It is >> my personal opinion that it is not a sign of magnanimity to add insult to >> injury. Your party has already suffered defeat and you are entitled to make >> comments to save whatever is left of its integrity and political viability. >> I am pushed by party members to write because of their insistence that the >> position of PDOIS which led it to become a member of the Group of Six has >> been distorted by your comments. They argue that such an unassailable >> position needs clear and volcanic amplification so that there is no >> confusion among our members and sympathisers and partners in the Group of >> Six. I know the comments will cause collateral damages to your cause and >> hope that you already know that that is not the objective. All opposition >> parties need to be strengthened so that the democratic space could be >> enlarged to enable the people to make informed choice without being >> subjected to fear or inducement. >> First and foremost, you claim that you did not join the Group of Six in >> their policy of non participation until electoral reform is effected >> because of your desire to test the strength of the APRC and to engage it >> just as Morgan Tsangvirai has engaged Robert Mugabe in Zimbabwe. >> Secondly, you claim that the people have told you that the opposition is >> in slumber in Banjul, an allegation you appear to accept and even made >> promises that you will be visiting the rural areas more frequently. >> At first sight, it would appear frivolous to take up an issue with you on >> these two positions. The reason is simple. No reasonable person could be >> convinced that you had the aim to test the strength of the APRC by >> contesting only eight seats out of 48 seats in the National Assembly >> elections and 10 seats out of 114 in the Council elections. You did not >> even put up candidates for the Mayoral seats in Banjul and KMC which could >> have been used as a yardstick to determine the popular vote. Needless to >> say, no person in his or her right mind would equate the statue of your >> party with that of the MDC of Tsangvirai. >> In the same vein no one in his or her right mind would say that all >> opposition parties are in a state of political slumber. It is evident that >> UDP has been holding rallies before the Local Government Elections. PDOIS >> of course is ever present as the major human rights defender in the country >> in the absence of civil society. Its visibility is more pronounced today >> than it ever was. Hence my personal opinion to the membership was that we >> should honour your comments with disregard since it amounted to an attempt >> to cover up unpleasant facts with diversionary comments that were neither >> here nor there. >> However, upon second reflection, I did see the need to take a divergent >> view in public with the aim of helping you in particular and the public at >> large to understand that non participation until electoral reform is >> effected cannot be equated with boycotting elections or creating a >> political vacuum as you are insinuating. On the contrary, non participation >> in our context is aimed at weakening the resolve of the ruling party to >> maintain the status quo by depriving it of any reasonable excuse to shy >> away from electoral reform. >> In fact, contrary to the impression you had given it is the policy of non >> participation in a grand style, at the right time in the right context for >> Zimbabwe which weakened Mugabe and compelled him to yield to the dictates >> of reason and the popular will by accepting a power sharing deal as well as >> constitutional and electoral reform. Apparently, you preferred to distort >> what actually happened in Zimbabwe in order to draw conclusions and lessons >> from fiction rather than facts, to suit your own justification for >> participation. >> Mr Bah, the facts are as plain as noon day. In 2008 Zimbabweans went to >> the polls. Tsangvirai of the Movement for Democratic Change won the first >> round of the Presidential Elections with 47.8 percent of the votes to >> Mugabe’s 43.2 Percent. Tsangvirai however adopted the tactic of non >> participation in the second round claiming that the violence and >> intimidation would obstruct the conducting of a free and fair election. >> Suffice it to say that Tsangvirai’s party had the majority of seats in the >> House of Assembly with 100 parliamentarians and 99 Parliamentary seats went >> to Mugabe’s Party. 10 seats went to the breakaway faction of the MDC. In >> the Senate, Tsangvirai’s party held 24 elected seats to Zanu PF’s 30 seats >> and the breakaway faction had 6 Senate seats. >> Here is a person who won an election in the first round after >> successfully challenging the incumbent but adopted the policy of non >> participation in the second round. Mugabe proceeded with the second round >> against himself. He won the second round but lost the elections in the eyes >> of the world. Being an experienced politician, he decided to acknowledge >> his defeat and read the minds of the majority of Zimbabweans who wanted >> Democratic change. He had to concede to the will of the people or >> perish. He decided to respond to the verdict of common sense and history >> and opened up talks for a coalition government pending constitutional and >> electoral reform. This is how matters stand in Zimbabwe. >> On your part, the outcome of your policy of participation under the >> present context only proved that your party has no popular base in any part >> of the country since you could not win a single seat in all the places >> where you have your strongest political base. It is therefore not fair to >> compare yourself to Tsangvirai. Political gambling and adventurism and >> sound political tactics cannot be equated. The lesson of Zimbabwe is very >> clear and not capable of distortion. >> It is the right of political parties to put or not to put up candidates. >> They put up candidates not to test the strength of a ruling party but to >> win elections. They demand for electoral reform before putting up >> candidates when they know that they could win elections but are >> disadvantaged by electoral malpractices. >> Mr Bah, the tactic of non participation is meant to remedy defects in the >> electoral system to enable the opposition to be as effective as MDC in >> Zimbabwe in electoral battle even if there are differences in objectives. >> In Zimbabwe one movement was created and was supported by the majority just >> to effect change. >> The opposition parties met after the presidential elections to go back to >> the drawing board in preparation for the National Assembly elections. I >> don’t know about NRP but PDOIS had identified 10 Constituencies where it >> could have put up candidates and perform up to expectation. The UDP must >> have done similar assessment. Since you did put up 8 Candidates it is fair >> to say that the opposition stood a chance to win up to 28 seats in the >> National Assembly if free and fair elections were to be held. Without free >> and fair elections the seats are usually reduced to two, three, four or >> five seats just as we have seen with the Independent Candidates during the >> 2012 National Assembly elections. The combined popular votes of the >> opponents of the APRC was just approximately six thousand votes less than >> that polled by ruling party but ended up with 5 out of 23 contested >> seats. >> In order to avert such outcome we decided to petition the IEC and >> catalogued our grievances such as the abuse of incumbency by the ruling >> party in the form of patronage by Public enterprises, the Cell phone >> companies, foreign investors as well as the utilisation of Public resources >> and Public office to promote political ends, Violation of the code of >> conduct for public servants and security personnel and the adoption >> of partisan postures by such forces in favour of the ruling >> party, intimidation of opposition candidates and the arrests of >> their supporters before and after the polls which deprive them of open >> support during election campaign. >> We called for a meeting of all stake holders to discuss the shortcomings >> of the system but the IEC failed to respond until the dying hours before >> nomination and then refused to postpone the elections. We also decided to >> adopt the tactics of non participation to show that we were serious about >> the need for electoral reform without which chances of building a >> formidable opposition is inconceivable. >> Your participation and its outcome has proven that the Group of Six is >> right. You concluded in your press conference that the APRC is weak but >> despite its weakness your party could not win a single seat. What does that >> say about your party or the electoral system? An electoral system where a >> weak ruling party sweeps the polls cannot be a credible or viable electoral >> system. How do you explain your results? >> We had anticipated that you will utilise your Press conference to confirm >> the legitimacy of the grievances of the Group of Six and draw lessons that >> would steer the country towards electoral reform. >> Instead you tried to legitimise your participation, vilify the opposition >> as parties in a state of political slumber and appease the IEC by >> commending them for a job well done. Interestingly enough, the same mouth >> which uttered the congratulatory message to the IEC also indicated that the >> IEC has made it crystal clear that it cannot stop governors and Chiefs from >> campaigning for the ruling party. In short, you became an apologist of the >> IEC instead of assessing its weakness and demanding renewed commitment to >> fulfill their constitutional and statutory mandate rather than show signs >> of helplessness. You claim to be part of the opposition that is making >> effort to effect electoral reform and that you are participating in >> meetings but had not said a single word in your press conference regarding >> the overstay of the IEC Chairman who has served his two seven year terms >> and could only be an adviser and not a member of the Commission. >> Mr. Bah, in arguing that your party participated in the elections to >> remain engaged negates the rationale for becoming an Independent candidate >> during the Presidential elections. We all agreed that a genuine multi party >> system ,that allows parties to contest on equal footing, does not exist. We >> formed a united front to put all hands on deck to ensure the people do not >> vote on the basis of a party but on the basis of a platform to effect >> democratic change and sort out the party differences later. Hence if you >> were truly interested in engaging the ruling party you should have been >> consistent with the tactics adopted during the Presidential elections and >> call on the Group of Six to support Independent candidates through out the >> Country so that they end up being the majority in Parliament and the >> councils and utilise the development as a justification of the need for >> political reform. >> At the Press Conference some members of your leadership are quoted to be >> blaming the other opposition Parties for asking their members not to vote >> for the NRP and that they were jubilating when they heard the results of >> the NRP. This is clearly an attempt to distort reality by looking for a >> scapegoat. >> Mr. Bah, it is strange that your leadership is arguing that non >> participation creates a political vacuum and leaves the ruling party >> without challenge. Facts and figures do not back the notion of the NRP >> leadership. Your own candidature as an Independent candidate during the >> presidential elections provides incontrovertible evidence against the >> perception of your leadership. >> Mr. Bah, NRP did not put up a candidate in the Presidential election of >> 2011. Other parties did not put up candidates. If you stood as an NRP >> candidate many people who do not agree with your party principles would not >> have voted for you. However there was no political vacuum. A United >> Front of opposition parties put up an Independent Candidate. In the same >> vein the non participation of the Group of Six parties did not create a >> political vacuum. During the National Assembly and Council elections, >> Independent Candidates stood to Challenge the ruling party. The results of >> both the National Assembly and Council elections reveal that the APRC was >> more vigorously engaged by the Independent Candidates than the NRP >> candidates. >> Hence, NRP appears to be diminishing its statue by losing elections while >> Independent candidates are winning. This shows that your tactic is neither >> eroding the powers of the APRC nor enhancing the political statue of your >> party as a force to be reckoned with. Tactics that do not weaken your >> opponent or enhance your strength or integrity are failed tactics. >> On the other hand, we are able to expose the APRC from two angles and >> weaken its grounds to claim that it has the overwhelming majority of >> Gambians behind it as a justification to resist electoral reform. In >> short, the tactic of non participation without discouraging people from >> voting for Independent candidates has led to real exposure of the >> weaknesses of the APRC from two angles. >> On one hand, the registered voters cast a vote of no confidence in the >> electoral system by not participating. On the other hand, many of those >> who participated decided to vote for Independent candidates as a sign of >> protest for a change in the electoral system. The facts and figures are >> very clear. There are 796,929 registered voters in the Gambia. During the >> 2012 National Assembly elections only candidates in 23 constituencies out >> of 48 contested in the elections. There are 308,000 registered voters in >> the 23 Constituencies. According to the IEC final tabulation only 152 839 >> registered voters participated. Over 644090 out of 796,929 registered >> voters did not participate in the National Assembly elections did not go to >> the polls. An electoral system which does not motivate candidates and the >> electors to participate is certainly not viable. This is the first point. >> The second point is that out of the 152,839 registered voters who >> participated in the elections the APRC with the full backing of the >> President, the Ministers, Governors, Chiefs, Village heads, Security >> personnel, councillors and the utilisation of public resources, especially >> threats in the state media could only have 80,289 votes while the >> Independent Candidates are now reported by the IEC to have 57,944 votes. >> NRP had 14606 votes. The narrow gap shows that the ruling party does not >> have the popular support it claims to have. >> In the local Government elections, the mayoral elections in Banjul and >> KMC are worth mentioning. In Banjul there are 21,178 registered voters. >> Only 9733 participated. The Independent Candidate had 4980 votes. The APRC >> had 3811 votes out of 21, 178 potential votes. The combined opponents of >> the APRC had 5922 votes. Hence, the opponents were 2111 votes ahead of the >> APRC. >> In KMC, there are 187,757 registered voters. The APRC candidate had >> 25,773 Votes and the Independent Candidate has 10,982 votes. Hence only >> 36,755 registered voters participated in the elections. Over 151,002 voters >> did not participate. >> Hence the non participation of the vast majority of registered voters and >> the decision to vote for Independent candidates as protest votes show very >> clearly that APRC does not have the support of the vast majority of people >> in this country and could no longer win major elections through inducement >> or intimidation. >> As far as PDOIS is concerned, the position of the Group of Six, has led >> to the exposure of the shortcomings and weaknesses of the APRC without >> creating any political vacuum. >> In short, the lessons that emerged from the two elections is that the >> APRC has the option of acceding to political reform and face genuine multi >> party Presidential contests with all parties putting up Presidential >> candidates in the first round and then form alliances in the second round >> or face a movement of an Independent Candidate that could bring all forces >> together to facilitate democratic change. >> The protest vote movement which is given vibrancy by the non >> participation of major opposition parties provides political collateral for >> electoral reform. In short, if they fail to change the laws to remove the >> constitutional ban to be a Presidential candidate based on age, restore >> the second round of voting if no candidate gets 50 percent majority, take >> initiative to prevent governors, traditional rulers and heads of tribunals >> like chiefs, village heads like alkalolu from interfering with the >> electoral process as well as ensuring that other public officers and >> state resources are not relied on for the electoral campaign of the ruling >> party, PDOIS would join the other opposition parties, if they agree to the >> tactics, to support one viable and selectable independent candidate to >> remove the APRC and install an interim government. Hence there is no way of >> escaping the potential for democratic change in 2016. >> It is therefore best for your party Mr. Bah, to assess its tactics in >> light of the fact that there will not be any political vacuum for it to >> exploit to go into the fighting ring with the APRC with kid’s gloves. >> As regards the engagement of the regime, no right thinking honest Gambian >> has any doubt that PDOIS is effectively engaging the government at all >> levels and is holding it accountable to the people. An effective >> opposition party is one that scrutinises, criticises and restrains impunity >> and speaks truth to public power. >> Your party should be the last to include PDOIS among parties that are >> languishing in political slumber. After the National Assembly elections we >> left no stone unturned to do away with the post electoral victimization of >> your candidates. Journalists should go to Sabach Ngian where your Candidate >> for Sabach Sanjal constituency lives and find out how they see PDOIS and >> tell the public their findings. How many arrests and detentions have we >> tackled in your own constituency and how many land dispute cases? Challenge >> us in writing for a catalogue of the cases. Who would say that we are not >> in touch with the farmers of the country and bringing their concerns to >> public power and getting response for onward transmission to them? Go to >> the workers and tell them that we are in political slumber. They will tell >> you how many of their cases we handle a week. Go to people in high places >> and tell them that PDOIS is in political slumber. They will tell you the >> number of letters they receive to take them to task. >> Go to the universities and schools to find out what impact we have in >> giving ideas on how to solve problems such as the recent riots at Saint >> Augustine’s Senior Secondary and the influence we have in shaping the >> careers of students or helping them to conduct their research programmes. >> Mr Bah, PDOIS was born to speak truth to public power. We did so in the >> first Republic and Justice Hassan Jallow and Chief Justice Sock could >> attest to receiving the same types of letters in the first Republic as the >> Ministry of Justice of the second Republic is receiving. >> When the Government of the first Republic surrendered to the coup makers >> we refused to surrender our sovereignty and spoke truth to public >> power. This is why we were active through the coup period despite the fact >> that parties were banned and a given Attorney General giving repeated >> warning that we were out of line to be writing and saying what we were >> doing before political parties were un-banned but was never able to deter >> us from our sovereign course to help restore the sovereignty of the people >> and their right to determine their manner of representation. Just like you >> today are accusing all of us to be in a state of political slumber in the >> face of overwhelming facts to prove the contrary, those who were supposed >> to be active during the coup period but abdicated their responsibilities >> would like people to believe that we had the backing of the state to do >> what we were doing. Magnanimity is what made us to let bygones be bygones >> and thus earn the respect of all those who thought they were in order to >> obstruct our cause as we struggled to defy restrictions to restore the >> sovereignty of the Republic and the people, even though we never held any >> Ministerial or official post before the coup. >> Facts make it evident that PDOIS is associated with every major tragedy >> under the Second Republic. Journalists should read the report of the >> Commission of enquiry on the April 10 incident. Not only will you find >> letters from the PDOIS leadership but also testimonies by PDOIS members who >> were following developments in the streets to try to prevent a massacre. >> It is the PDOIS leadership that put an end to the tragedy of the witch >> hunters. The PDOIS leadership did not hesitate to come to the defence of >> sanity after the executions to the point of being attacked on national >> television and in the press by frustrated Ministers. >> When information came that an armed insurrection was imminent it was the >> PDOIS leadership which conducted an efficient investigation in Senegal to >> help Gambians to have a clear picture of the mood of the Senegalese >> government which reflected gross dissatisfaction with the execution of its >> citizens but had not reach the level of contemplating to launch a Tanzania >> type of removal of Idi Amin. History has proven that it was right for us to >> dismiss false hopes and give confidence to the people that they have within >> them the sovereign will to take charge of their destiny if they truly want >> democratic change. >> The PDOIS leadership is known for combating arrests and detentions >> without trial. The cases of Alhaji Ismaila Manjang, Imam Ba Kawsu Fofana, >> etc were followed until their release. The case of Imam Baba Leigh is being >> followed and will be followed until his release. During the misinformation >> campaign on the EU seventeen points, it is the PDOIS leadership that did >> the clarification. >> When those who aspired to be nominated councillors and those nominated or >> their supporters were subjected to arrests and harassment we came to their >> defence. >> Suffice to say that we did not hesitate to clarify issues associated >> with the recent amendments of the criminal code and the lapse >> after local government elections. PDOIS is ever present and current. It is >> awake and will never go to sleep. Those who aim to allow conscience and >> justice be their guide must ever stand vigil to protect the rights of even >> those who view them as enemies knowing fully well that if one cannot do >> justice to an enemy one would never be able to guarantee it to a friend. >> The only just person is one who harbours no ill will against anyone and is >> always concerned and determined to redress harm done to everyone . >> To conclude we must say that you have every right not to give us credit >> for the work we are doing but you have no right to distort the facts. Truth >> is like the sun. No one could cover the sun with the palm of one’s hand. >> One could only cover or close one’s eye and imagine that it does not exist. >> We therefore hope that in an attempt to justify your own political >> missteps you will not try to erode the hard earned integrity of the >> opposition that is bent on moving forward to promote electoral reform and >> to do everything humanly possible to make a difference in 2016. Should you >> disagree with any point that is asserted, we would like you to concede to a >> debate or joint press conference to clarify our different positions and >> answer questions. >> Yours in the service of the people >> *Halifa Sallah >> **Secretary General, PDOIS* >> Source: *Picture: Halifa Sallah* >> ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ To >> unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web >> interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html To Search >> in the Gambia-L archives, go to: >> http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact >> the List Management, please send an e-mail to: >> [log in to unmask]¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ >> ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ To >> unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web >> interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html >> >> To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: >> http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact >> the List Management, please send an e-mail to: >> [log in to unmask]¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ >> > > > > -- > *"Be the change you want to see in the World"* > ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ To > unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web > interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html > > To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: > http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact the > List Management, please send an e-mail to: > [log in to unmask]¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ > ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to: [log in to unmask] ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤