Nyang, if I was BB's son, I will lure Halifa into the bush and beat the hell out of him. He is the one responsible for all these injustices exhibited by the constitution. A very scruffy unconscientious fella. Lamin is a lawyer and knows how to do research. Daffeh On Wednesday, 30 April 2014, Modou Nyang <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Daffeh, i will pick it up from LJ and ask "do you have any case law in > mind"? Please share it while yuo are at it to prove some point and your > credentials. I will folow up on the political stuff later. > On Wednesday, April 30, 2014 11:34 AM, UDP United Kingdom < > [log in to unmask]> wrote: > > I am not offended by anything Lamin for I have no vested interest in this. > I just happen to disagree with you. > > Also, I don't think you are right in saying that the PPP did nothing > about the issue. I think they have sought legal advice and was told the > odds are starkly against them. BB's attempt to assert his property right > failed as it was not entertained by the courts. > > Thanks > Daffeh > > On Wednesday, 30 April 2014, Lamin Darbo <[log in to unmask]> > wrote: > > Daffeh > > I am not asking the PPP to do anything, only arguing that the party never > bothered to do anything about its propertyl rights and must therefore not > complain about a lack of support from Gambians. Supporting the PPP was the > last thing in anyone's mind in 1994 for there was overwhelming congruence > of opinion that its government got what it deserved. > > In any case, if BB did take action on his personal rights notwithstanding > Schedule 2, what should have stopped the PPP from so acting? BB was wrong > to blame Gambians for the fate of his government and party. I have seen > nothing to change my view that the PPP deserved to be overthrown. This side > of 1994, it is a moot point but I have argued that position even before > 1994 and was not surprised when it came to pass. Sorry if you are offended > but that is my view! > > > > LJDarbo > On Wednesday, 30 April 2014, 13:46, UDP United Kingdom < > [log in to unmask]> wrote: > Lamin, there is no point in them doing so. There is an overwhelming case > law in this area and their chances of success is utter. It would not make > any economic or political sense for them to do what you are asking them to > do. It will not only open them to judicial ridicule-the case will be deemed > frivolous and rightly dismissed most likely with cost-, it will amount to > utter waste of time and money as well. > > I think your views about the PPP is bit over the top particula > > ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ To > unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web > interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html > > To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: > http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact the > List Management, please send an e-mail to: > [log in to unmask]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml',[log in to unmask]);>¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ > ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to: [log in to unmask] ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤