Nyang, if I was BB's son, I will lure Halifa into the bush and beat the
hell out of him. He is the one responsible for all these injustices
exhibited by the constitution. A very scruffy unconscientious fella.

Lamin is a lawyer and knows how to do research.

Daffeh

On Wednesday, 30 April 2014, Modou Nyang <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Daffeh, i will pick it up from LJ and ask "do you have any case law in
> mind"? Please share it while yuo are at it to prove some point and your
> credentials. I will folow up on the political stuff later.
>   On Wednesday, April 30, 2014 11:34 AM, UDP United Kingdom <
> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> I am not offended by anything Lamin for I have no vested interest in this.
> I just happen to disagree with you.
>
> Also, I don't think you are right in saying that the PPP did nothing
> about the issue. I think they have sought legal advice and was told the
> odds are starkly against them. BB's attempt to assert his property right
> failed as it was not entertained by the courts.
>
> Thanks
> Daffeh
>
> On Wednesday, 30 April 2014, Lamin Darbo <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
> Daffeh
>
> I am not asking the PPP to do anything, only arguing that the party never
> bothered to do anything about its propertyl rights and must therefore not
> complain about a lack of support from Gambians. Supporting the PPP was the
> last thing in anyone's mind in 1994 for there was overwhelming congruence
> of opinion that its government got what it deserved.
>
> In any case, if BB did take action on his personal rights notwithstanding
> Schedule 2, what should have stopped the PPP from so acting? BB was wrong
> to blame Gambians for the fate of his government and party. I have seen
> nothing to change my view that the PPP deserved to be overthrown. This side
> of 1994, it is a moot point but I have argued that position even before
> 1994 and was not surprised when it came to pass. Sorry if you are offended
> but that is my view!
>
>
>
> LJDarbo
>   On Wednesday, 30 April 2014, 13:46, UDP United Kingdom <
> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>  Lamin, there is no point in them doing so. There is an overwhelming case
> law in this area and their chances of success is utter. It would not make
> any economic or political sense for them to do what you are asking them to
> do. It will not only open them to judicial ridicule-the case will be deemed
> frivolous and rightly dismissed most likely with cost-, it will amount to
> utter waste of time and money as well.
>
> I think your views about the PPP is bit over the top particula
>
> ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ To
> unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web
> interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
>
> To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to:
> http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact the
> List Management, please send an e-mail to:
> [log in to unmask]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml',[log in to unmask]);>¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
>


¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html

To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤