Nyang, if I was BB's son, I will lure Halifa into the bush and beat the hell out of him. He is the one responsible for all these injustices exhibited by the constitution. A very scruffy unconscientious fella.

Lamin is a lawyer and knows how to do research.

Daffeh

On Wednesday, 30 April 2014, Modou Nyang <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Daffeh, i will pick it up from LJ and ask "do you have any case law in mind"? Please share it while yuo are at it to prove some point and your credentials. I will folow up on the political stuff later.  
On Wednesday, April 30, 2014 11:34 AM, UDP United Kingdom <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
I am not offended by anything Lamin for I have no vested interest in this. I just happen to disagree with you.

Also, I don't think you are right in saying that the PPP did nothing about the issue. I think they have sought legal advice and was told the odds are starkly against them. BB's attempt to assert his property right failed as it was not entertained by the courts.

Thanks
Daffeh

On Wednesday, 30 April 2014, Lamin Darbo <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Daffeh

I am not asking the PPP to do anything, only arguing that the party never bothered to do anything about its propertyl rights and must therefore not complain about a lack of support from Gambians. Supporting the PPP was the last thing in anyone's mind in 1994 for there was overwhelming congruence of opinion that its government got what it deserved. 

In any case, if BB did take action on his personal rights notwithstanding Schedule 2, what should have stopped the PPP from so acting? BB was wrong to blame Gambians for the fate of his government and party. I have seen nothing to change my view that the PPP deserved to be overthrown. This side of 1994, it is a moot point but I have argued that position even before 1994 and was not surprised when it came to pass. Sorry if you are offended but that is my view!



LJDarbo
On Wednesday, 30 April 2014, 13:46, UDP United Kingdom <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Lamin, there is no point in them doing so. There is an overwhelming case law in this area and their chances of success is utter. It would not make any economic or political sense for them to do what you are asking them to do. It will not only open them to judicial ridicule-the case will be deemed frivolous and rightly dismissed most likely with cost-, it will amount to utter waste of time and money as well.

I think your views about the PPP is bit over the top particula
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html

To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to: [log in to unmask]');" target="_blank">[log in to unmask] ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤

¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html

To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to: [log in to unmask] ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤