SCIENCE-AS-CULTURE Archives

Sci-Cult Science-as-Culture

SCIENCE-AS-CULTURE@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
ScipolicyNews <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Sci-Cult Science-as-Culture <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 6 Oct 2000 15:53:50 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (67 lines)
Robert Mann writes,
>         It is not possible to do the latter.>

He is referring to my statement:
 > >The point of my original posting is many apt and capable students do
indeed
reject the idea of evolution as a grand scheme (macro) though they may
understand the process natural selection in individual cases (micro).>>

In the above, "Micro" is referring to specific biological features of a
particular species with respect to a specific environment, e.g., the webbed
feet of frogs.

Systematically, the macro is the sum of the parts (micro). Logically, they
cannot be the same and they cannot be mutually exclusive.

In the very last line of the last paragraph Darwin used the term "evolution"
to mean an overriding process:
 "...whilst this planet has goes cycling on according to the fixed law of
gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most
wonderful have been, and are being evolved."
(Title: The Origin of Species By Means of Natural Selection - or the
Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life)

Best,
Stephen

Stephen Miles Sacks, MPA, Ph.D.,
Editor and Publisher
SCIPOLICY-The Journal of Science and Health Policy
Box 504, Haverford, PA 19041
Voice and Fax: 610-658-2332 (24 hours)
Website: http://www.Scipolicy.net
E-mail: [log in to unmask]

The premier issue is for Fall 2000 is now in publication.  The issue focuses
on The Future of Large-Scale Health Systems and  includes several articles
on health systems and the problems, changes in institutional ethics, and a
case study of the University of Pennsylvania Health System. Subscriptions
and orders for individual copies can be placed on line at
http://www.Scipolicy.net.  Proposals and contributed articles are  welcome.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Mann" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, October 06, 2000 5:53 AM
Subject: Re: Evolution and Cognitive Dissonance


> Stephen Sacks wrote:
> >The point of my original posting is many apt and capable students do
indeed
> >reject the idea of evolution as a grand scheme (macro) though they may
> >understand the process natural selection in individual cases (micro).
>
>         It is not possible to do the latter.
>
> R
>
>
> -
> Robt Mann
> consultant ecologist
> P O Box 28878   Remuera, Auckland 1005, New Zealand
>                 (9) 524 2949
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2