Hey there, you with the mote in your eye,.........,
        Carol Cox - in these columns - said precisely what should be said
about this to put it aside neatly, quickly, completely, succinctly.
      I feel you, Llevitt, may have taken up the cry as directed by the
Holocaust Industry which is to once more take up as much of our horizons,
time and energies as possible talking about what they want/require the world
to talk about, namely something, ANYTHING Jewish, Jewish, Jewish, Jewish,
Jewish, the goal being to displace the "by, for and about..." of any of the
other 499 people out of 500 amongst the 6.3 billion people of the world who
are not Jewish.
    Do you remember the old saying about the corrupt politician who said,
"Say anything you want about me Booby - just spell my name right!".
    And by the way, since you bring up that bromide,  I'm long since fed up
with this similar constant '......deny the holocaust......' crap.  I deny
it, where 'it' is the presentations of the hyper-Semitics as they present a
distorted and therefore grossly false picture of this horrific aspect of
WWII.
          When we are required, standing before the law, to affirm that our
testimony will provide the best effort to present the truth, the oath is
'........the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth........'
[scholars of legal oaths, please correct if I've got it wrong] .  But the
truth about the holocaust is - the whole truth or at least, closer to it -
that about 23 million human beings were killed in the Nazi concentration
camps, of which probably 6 million were Jews.  Ironically, in all
likelihood, some of those 17 million non-Jews were anti-Semites - in fact
actually, in my experience, if they were Polish, they were probably
downright virulent in their bigotry!
      Yet the hyper-Semitics continue profiting by repeated half-truths with
their 'in-your-face' pushing of painfully disgusting photographs depicting
mountains of naked, emaciated bodies most of whom are not Jews at all.
Think about the sensibilities of surviving relatives; are they not worthy of
consideration by the Hype-The-Holocaust gangs?
      Similar photographs, no matter what the context, are very rarely to be
seen in any public format because the rest of us accept a standard of common
decency.  Riding rough shod over the needs of others is a prominent and
abiding trait of Israel supporters.  Is there no need to hold these persons
accountable?  They have created an industry based on their belief that they
are not only the most but virtually the only aggrieved people in the world.
    Let's get on to what is by, for, and about some of those other people I
alluded to with perhaps a bit of special  attention to those who are being
tortured right now rather than those who may have suffered over half a
century ago.  Might I suggest the list include Palestinians who daily die
and suffer in squalor while their oppressors are content to discuss
endlessly in the comforts and with the weapons bought by USA dollars?
Frank Warhurst
----- Original Message -----
From: "llevitt" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: 28 04 2003, Monday 03:27
Subject: Re: [CHOMSKY] The Protocols of Zion


> It is hard for me to believe that a presumably intelligent and otherwise
well-informed person (evidence:  being on the Chomsky list) could ask such
questions. It is well known and well-established that the Protocols are a
forgery that after many years of having been totally discredited, are once
again in circulation due to the resurgence of antisemitism. What I find most
amazing and disturbing is the question you pose,
> "[D]oes any of our current events give credence to that work?" The
implication is the rubric of the most virulent antisemites, those who even
deny the Holocaust, that a tiny minority of neo-con Jews whose views happen
to coincide with those of  the present administration, somehow contrive and
control the behavior of the power brokers and military of the U.S.  It is
ludicrous to even contemplate such a monstrous notion. I trust others
(hopefully, Chomsky himself) will give you the details; if no one else comes
forward within the next few days, I will.
>> Leon >   ----- Original Message ----- >   From: F. Leon Wilson >   To:
[log in to unmask]
>   Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2003 9:17 PM >   Subject: [CHOMSKY] The
Protocols of Zion
>  >  >   CHOMSKY Forum Members: >  >   What is the history of The Protocols
of Zion?
> >   I have a copy of The Protocols of Zion and in view of recent
wars/events and >   disclosure regarding Israel, Jews and Anti-Jews; it has
generated many >   questions regarding Judaism and "The Protocols of Zion."
>  >   What is the history of The Protocols of Zion and does any of our
current
>   events give credence to that work? >  >   F. Leon >