CHOMSKY Archives

The philosophy, work & influences of Noam Chomsky

CHOMSKY@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
The philosophy, work & influences of Noam Chomsky
Date:
Thu, 4 Nov 1999 01:00:17 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (241 lines)
Chechnya and the Left 

At what point do we care?

A major war is being waged in Chechnya, complete with NATO-style bombings of
hospitals, TV stations, oil refineries, and the similar necessary facilities
of a modern society. Hundreds of thousands of refugees pour across borders,
but no international relief operations are even contemplated. As this
article is going to press, tens of thousands of Russian ground troops are
descending into the area, and it seems likely that the carnage of the
1994-96 war, which left 80,000 people dead, will be repeated.

The military operations would not be possible without massive financial
assistance of the International Monetary Fund ($20 Billion has been loaned
to the Russians since 1992), and the Clinton administration has urged yet
more aid. Moreover, US officials have yet to voice any criticism whatsoever
of the violence. The few government statements so far issued reflect
Clinton’s statements during the 94-96 War; Russia, said Clinton while
pushing for approval of a $10.2 Billion loan, half of which went to the
Chechen campaign, needs to "maintain its territorial integrity."

Clinton, of course, picks and chooses which war-ravished peoples he cares
about. Judging by the administration’s varied response to conflicts in
Kosovo, East Timor, Sudan, Chiapas, and Chechnya, among others, it’s fairly
plain that US diplomatic and military intervention exactly coincides with
the interests of western economic elites. The continued profitable
extraction of natural resources from the Indonesian archipelago, for
example, is more important than the lives of a few hundred thousand
Timorese, but three thousand Kosovars are justification for expanding the
global investment market into the formerly closed economies of the Balkans.
So it should come as no surprise that the massive Russian economy, and
especially potential Russian oil field development in the Caspian Sea, is
placed above tens of thousands of Chechen lives.

More complexing, though, is the silence of the American people, especially
in progressive political circles. A search of liberal and progressive news
and commentary sources came up empty. The massive Z Magazine website, which
has extensive material on the Russian labor movement, as well daily updates
on East Timor and Kosovo, and pretty much any other issue you can think of,
ignores the current Chechen crisis. The Nation hasn’t mentioned it. None of
the other two dozen or so mailing lists that the Examiner is part of has
made mention of Chechnya.

For once, the mainstream press has provided more information than its
critics have, albeit that information is spotty and relegated to the back pages.

A Brief History of Chechnya

The Chechen people have distinct cultural origins and a language that dates
back at least 6,000 years. They are now predominately Islamic, and have a
particularly strong self-identity. Chechnya, along with the rest of the
Caucasus under Moscow's rule, was conquered by the Russians after the
Crimean War (1853-1856), at roughly the same time that the United States was
conquering the Navaho and other indigenous peoples of the American
southwest, and as European imperialist states were slicing apart Africa.
Russia annexed Chechnya outright in 1859.

While Russian suppression of the Caucus area peoples waxed and waned with
the fortunes of the various regimes in Moscow, with a particularly brutal
war in 1920-21, there was a more of less continual resistance movement of
Chechens against Russian domination. During World War II Chechen leaders
publicly announced that they would welcome the advancing German army if the
Germans recognized an independent Chechnya, and Stalin used the announcement
to justify the general purge of non-Russians; some 800,000 Chechnyans (as
well as the Ingush, the Karachay-Balkar, Crimean Tatars, and other
nationalities) were deported to Kazakhstan and Siberia in 1944. Perhaps as
many as 400,000 Chechens died as a result of the relocation (out of perhaps
15 million of all nationalities throughout the Soviet Union).

The post-Stalin years saw a relative easing of ethnic tensions, and in 1956
Chechens were "rehabilitated" and allowed to return to the province in 1957.
Through the ordeal, however, they had lost about half their population, as
well as considerable control of the land and economic resources of the province.

When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, a Soviet Air Force General by the
name of Dzhokhar Dudayev gained considerable notice and acclaim for his
refusal to attack Estonia, which had declared its independence. In the
general chaos in the wake of the attempted coup against Mikhail Gorbachev,
Dudayev, an ethnic Chechen, flew back to Chechnya and conducted an election;
he was named President of an independent Chechnya in October of 1991.

Curiously, western nations recognized the newly declared nations that had
been Soviets because they had been occupied by the Soviet Union, yet
Chechnya was denied recognition as it had been occupied by the tsars.

At any event, by 1994 Boris Yeltsin had consolidated power in Moscow to such
a degree that he was willing to confront the de facto independence of
Chechnya. A Russian-backed rebel group attacked the capital city of Grozny
in November of that year but was repulsed. In December the Russian military
began a full assault on the nation.

The 1994-96 War

The Russian assault on Chechnya was terribly brutal. Grozny was more or less
obliterated by bombing, and a hundred thousand refugees left the city in the
middle of winter. About 80,000 people died in the war.

But Chechen resolve was stiff, and the resistance was blessed with military
genius. Twice cities within Russia proper were taken by resistance troops,
and opposition to the war was strong among the general Russian population.

Although Russian attacks were brutal, the Chechens prevailed, retaking
Grozny and handing an embarrassing defeat to what was once billed as the
world’s strongest army. The war demonstrated the overall weakness of the
Russian military, the fact that an obscure group of separatists in the
Georgian highlands could defeat the Russian military giving the lie to fifty
years’ worth of Western Cold War propaganda. Alexander Lebed, a former
general appointed as Russia's appointed by Boris Yeltsin to the post of
national security adviser toured the Russian military camps in Chechnya and
described the army as "hungry, lice-ridden, and underclothed weaklings."

Lebed arranged a truce with the Chechens, and Chechnya became independent in
all but name. The Chechen government controls all resources, and makes all
decisions within the territory, with one exception: under the terms of the
1996 peace treaty Russian oil pipelines through the territory remain in
Russian control.

The Current Conflict

Russian domination of the entire Caucasus region has been answered with a
revitalized devotion to Islam. Predictably, as the Russian suppression
becomes increasingly violent, the resistance movements become more
radicalized, and a fundamentalist brand of Islam has gained hold among the
fighters. As Chechnya provides an area free of the Russian military,
resistance fighters from nearby provinces, especially Dagestan, have
established camps there, and make raids from there to free their own homelands.

Thanks to the earlier war, Chechnya is a devastated place, with a ruined
economy and broken infrastructure. The government has made attempts to bring
the various militias into the governing process, but centralized power is
still weak, and independent militias control entire districts.

Moreover, in the past couple of months there have been a series of terrorist
bombings in Moscow, killing about 300 people. These bombs have been blamed
on the southern separatists and Chechens, and public opinion in Moscow calls
for action.

As a result, Chechen nationals throughout Russia have been arrested and
deported, and the Russian military has advanced. About ten days of aerial
bombing preceded the current army advance, which seems designed to carve out
a Russian-control district in the northern lowlands of the territory.

It’s worth noting, as has the Christian Science Monitor, that Russia has
adopted the rhetoric and tactics used by the United States in the
Yugoslavian War. "Russia is using force to prevent a humanitarian
catastrophe," said Alexander Ignatev, a policy analyst connected to the
Kremlin. "The lives of thousands in the North Caucasus and Russia are at
risk, and this compels action."

Bombing targets around Grozny include oil refineries, a TV tower, a
telephone exchange, and the residential neighborhood where Chechen President
Aslan Maskhadov lives.

Russian Generals are appearing on Moscow TV news programs, talking about
"pinpoint" strikes that spare the civilian population. One press briefing
featured cockpit video shot by an attacking Russian Su-25 bomber as it
bombed Grozny's TV tower.

But there is a huge difference between bombing to liberate a territory, and
bombing to conquer a territory. Chechens have already proven to be a
formidable force, and it’s doubtful that the Russians can take the territory
without high causalities.

Given the regional aspects of the conflict, it’s also possible that nearby
countries could be pulled into the war, perhaps even Iran.

The Oil Connection

Radio Free Europe reports that the current fighting followed a meeting
between Maskhadov and Russian Prime Minister Sergei Stepashin on June 11. On
the same day, Chechnya's national guard tried to take control of its
150-kilometer section of the Baku-Novorossiisk oil pipeline. Three days
later, the pipeline was blown up, and Russia suspended its shipments from Baku.

Indeed, says Radio Free Europe, the 1994 Russian invasion of Chechnya came
"just three months after Azerbaijan signed its landmark Caspian oil contract
with the Azerbaijan International Operating Company, setting off the race
for pipeline routes. Most experts believe the pipeline issue was at least a
contributory cause of the war.

"As a sign of oil's importance, Moscow's first task after the war was to
negotiate a transit deal and rebuild the pipeline. Reconstruction of the
line remains one of the few commitments to Chechnya that has been honored
since hostilities ceased." Although not the only issue in the conflict, the
oil question, concludes Radio Free Europe, "may be critical to all the other
countries and territories in the region that Caspian pipelines must cross."

The Responsibilities of the Left

What should be our response?

Surely progressives should advocate for human rights in whatever region of
the world where they are violated. Russia raises particularly difficult
issues with Americans in general, but especially among leftists. The baggage
of support for the murderous Stalinist regime is still carried by segments
of the left, while the general collapse of state socialism leads many to
avoid the subject entirely. But the political difficulty should not
translate into abandonment of an aggrieved people.

Moreover, the Chechen issue should resonate with general leftist critiques
of American hegemony. Certainly the massive, multi-billion dollar assistance
given to Russia by the US government enables the current onslaught. Just
this week Russian military planners have estimated that the Chechen campaign
will cost $1 Billion, a cost that simply would not be possible without
Western aid. It should be relatively easy to build an analysis of the
effects of an expansive global Capitalism, sponsored by US government grants
and IMF loans, on minority peoples in the old Soviet Union, and to analyze
the policy goals of government and economic planners.

And Chechnya is yet another cog in the oil economy, another instance of our
reliance on that resource resulting, at least in part, in subjugation of an
entire nationality.

Perhaps most important, though, the Chechen situation illustrates the
complete and utter moral bankruptcy of the emerging Capitalist Russia. It
should come as no surprise that the abrupt death of the centralized economy
should result in Mafia control, massive poverty, and military adventurism.

At a minimum, leftists should be discussing the issue.

I would argue that we further work to tie US, IMF, and World Bank assistance
to Russian human rights policies, and the Russian withdrawal from the
Caucuses generally. Ultimately the Western world needs to make its peace
with the Islamic peoples, and support for the basic rights and welfare of
the people of Chechnya is as good a place to start as any.





Milutin

--
I am the Nina, The Pinta, The Santa, Maria
The noose and, the rapist
The fields overseer
The agents, of orange
The priests of Hiroshima
The cost of my desire
Sleep now in the fire

ATOM RSS1 RSS2