Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 15 Feb 2018 11:44:14 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
“Attempting to apply biomedical principles to the
classification and treatment of psychological and
emotional distress, psychiatry it seems,
relentlessly pursued a disease base model of
psychological functioning without the requisite
physiological and biochemical evidence that other
branches of medicine medicine so fundamentally
relied upon. In doing so, psychiatry assumed an
axiomatic stand on the biological origins of
psychological abnormality and committed itself to
a fixed and inflexible framework. Psychological
functioning according to the reflected disease,
biological breakdown, and malfunction, and if the
available evidence did not support the underlying
biology, it … would reveal itself. The absence of
evidence and the wide-scale prevalence of
abnormality in the general population has
seriously undermined this classification system
but has also raised important questions
regarding the assumed boundaries between sanity
and insanity and between normality and abnormality.”
Murphy, On Human Nature, Tibayrenc, Michel,
Ayala, Francisco, Academic Press, 2017 p 459.
Powered by LSoft's LISTSERV(R) list management software
|
|
|