One of the main activities in our human field of researche is: to give
names to all the facts and concepts we have to build.

 Psycho aproach, no matter under which suffixes they may be understood,
deals with it seriously and ethically ( ethos, the proper place of something
)when tries to develop research under what is called case-study.

 How to keep partners undercovered, keeping the maximum exposition of the
intimate particular descriptions and speech, which signs can even permit
other to recognize the patient under her/his speech text and history (
although I prefer story ).

 Internet and its use has took me to one main conclusion: coding, under the
domain of cover and conceal, is the best alternative.

 The argument of des-humanization must be faced with a deep questioning of
its intentions.

 Several books of literature are written and based on such actions,
protecting and refering to actual personalities.

 In a time when private and public are so mixed, we MUST protect, not only
our partners, but most of all our research field of this "mix'age", and I
think coding is the best solution.

 If we work this way, we will better develop research, psycho estatistics
and therapy itself.

 Although I'm a brazilian native, I must admit that there are a lot of other
people in the world that are very and deep similar to me, no matter under
which circumstances  they may had or have.Or should we start questioning why
this need of names, and here we are sent to Lacan, directly?

 Osmar, quoting my 23 age son:

 " Employ teenagers - while they know everything."