In a message dated 2/22/2014 7:31:10 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, [log in to unmask] writes:
Years ago, when one could hardly dream of putting cornices back on distinguished
buildings such as Carson's or the Marquette, a preservationist commented, "The
cornice doesn't pay rent."
 
That is an excellent related question.  All those people who rented in white brick buildings in the 1960s - they didn't care a whit for what their building looked like - that's just the way it was.   In the 1910s, did a building with a BSC (Big Swingin' Cornice) rent better?   In the 1900s, 10s, 20s, there were all kinds of fancy buildings - but no evidence that the fanciness brought in extra money. 
 
c

--
**Please remember to trim posts, as requested in the Terms of Service**

To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html