Wait. What do you know about the people in Twin Falls? I have been maligning them? I don’t think so.  I’m one of them.

This is getting to be ridiculous.  Do what you want with your band of friends.  Go save the world with them (quite apart from starting a civil war).  By all means, Peter.  You are a saint.

Phil


On Feb 12, 2024, at 1:19 PM, Peter Philippson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

We have a comedian who plays that character.

Well of course Clint Eastwood is a great actor, and we all love his films.  But [getting angrier] if he came and urinated in our letterbox, I would give him a slap and say 'Oy Clint, you are a great actor, but I will not tolerate you urinating in my letterbox'.

So you have been maligning the good people of Twin Falls.  But take this further, if I have some friends come and visit, and we see someone being threatened because of their views or race or religion, and we step in to protect them, (which is all I was talking about, not starting a civil war myself) would we then be that 'gang of crazy lefties' and fair game?

Peter

On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 at 18:49, Philip Brownell <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Notice that I said if you come here with a band of crazy leftists (ie, as in a civil war) threatening people and doing harm?  Peter, if you came here to live you COULD live. People do that here right now. Twin Falls continues to grow, and a lot of the people coming here are the ones leaving failed left run cities. There is an Islamic prayer center.  We have a refugee center pouring people into the community from Africa, Pakistan, and now Ukraine.  There is a college. There is freedom of expression. It’s like most other places, with the exception that people are largely leaning to the right and patriotic. They are farmers, industry workers, educators, doctors, nurses, lawyers.  They also like to hunt. 

I’m not living in a place where only one viewpoint is safe.  However, I’m not living in a place where people have no viewpoint of their own, and they are likely to tell you if they disagree with yours.

On Feb 12, 2024, at 11:16 AM, Peter Philippson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

OK let's go with it.  Is there freedom of expression and political or religious/anti-religious views in Twin Falls?  If I moved there and told people my views would I be threatening their lives or would they be threatening me?  If I killed one of your friends to stop him/her killing me, would you then shoot my ass?  I am being inflammatory?

And if you are living in a place where only one viewpoint is safe, what would be your motivation in living there and having friends there?  What would you be saying to them about what it means to be a Christian there?

Remember, this is not just crazy rhetoric from me.  This is my family history.where people were told that they were in danger from crazy leftist Jews, while at the same time it was the Jews being threatened.  Then the book-burning, which is bad enough as it is, but whose aim was to take away any chance of the children of Twin Falls hearing about the good side of Judaism or Socialism or Islam.

Meanwhile, I know the truth that, in my city which is as far left as any city in Britain, there is a large Christian population, as well as a large Jewish and Islamic and LGBTQ populations.  I don't have to advise you not to come and live here, your books will not be burned - but if you encourage people to attack Moslems or gay people you will be arrested.

Peter

On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 at 18:00, Philip Brownell <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
If you come with a gang of left crazy people to Twin Falls (first, I would advise not doing that), and you threaten my home or the lives of my friends, yes. Unfortunately, I will shoot your ass.  SO.  Don’t do it. Pull back from the inflammatory rhetoric about what a solution civil war is.  There are no winners.

On Feb 12, 2024, at 10:42 AM, Peter Philippson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

And you Phil?

Peter

On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 at 17:41, Philip Brownell <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
And if it comes to civil war, which one of you will be out in the streets fighting? My bet is not one. 

On Feb 12, 2024, at 10:32 AM, Dan Bloom <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Peter and Charlie:

It was LBJ who approached the political process with the hope that “we can reason together.”  He is known for having passed the most far-reaching legislation of any president. He forged coalitions for civil rights, for example. 

I lack LBJ’s faith that “we can reason together.”  This is what I’ve been sayin by the crisis and collapse of our Enlightenment values.

To say something reasonable is not the same as saying that is “true.”  This is a problem. Fake news is “reasonable.”  Of course “Antifa” was behind the insurrection, a pizza restaurant was the headquarters of a pedophile ring, and Trump is the rightful winner of the election. 

“Reason” can be the whore of thinking.  It can go and do anything for a price.

The South and the North each had reasonable and incompatible points of view. It took the Civil War to resolve this. 

Dan

On Feb 12, 2024, at 12:20 PM, Peter Philippson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Thank you Charlie.

I am not so sure about reason unfortunately.  Look at our process here.  Reason becomes an equalising process where the most crazy things are said as 'reasonable' arguments - Phil is great at that.  At some point, people must say 'No!  No argument, no reasoning like adults, just no!  You threaten me and the nation, and I don't need any reasonable argument to replace fighting you.'

Sometimes the fight just needs to happen if that is in the wings, because reason won't cut it.  Paradoxically, because the MAGA people are such cowards, the threat to actually fight has usually led to backing down.  That is one of the truths of January 6th: the insurgents had enough people and firepower to kill the people they were threatening to kill, and all the police, but they backed down in the face of police fighting back, then claiming that they were just day-trippers.  When I've intervened when street bullies were threatening people, they have always backed down when they saw that I was ready for real violence.

Best wishes,

Peter

On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 at 16:05, Charlie Bowman <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Dan, when you said "echo chamber" it reminded me of a portion of Al Gore's speech at the Davos economic summit:  
"These algorithms that suck people down proverbial rabbit holes, they're more like the pitcher plants with slippery sides and at the bottom of the rabbit hole, that's where the echo chamber is. And people who dwell long enough in the echo chamber become vulnerable to a new kind of AI. Not artificial intelligence, but artificial insanity."

The comparison of Joe Biden to Donald Trump is ridiculous and only perpetuated by algorithmic news delivery. Biden, while a politician, is not a criminal. He's been convicted of nothing and the last time I checked, that was a requirement of democracy, not the result of spending time at the bottom of the rabbit hole.

Trump is a convicted criminal. The litmus test for me has always been, "would I want my children to follow in the footsteps of my leaders."  Barack and Michelle Obama have come the closest to that standard.

I hold no quarter for MAGA Republicans, and believe the last hope we have left is a political appeal to reason.  Reform must come now; reforms in both how we pollute our environment and how we receive information.  We must change in the direction of healing our planet, regardless of the nature of the fight we must undertake.

Charlie

"For green grass and clean rivers, children with bright eyes and good color, and people safe from being pushed around – for a few things like these, I find I am pretty ready to think away most other political, economic, and technological advantages."   - Paul Goodman, 1970


On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 3:35 PM Dan Bloom <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Sure. MAGA people don’t wear red hats or walk in lock-step with their creator.  That’s a media creation of the left.  Congress is not in a deadlock on immigration and foreign aid because MAGA’s leader issued a command.  My mistake.  I guess I ought to stop reading stuff printed by my echo chamber.  LOL.

Values? I refer to the Enlightenment values of reason and discourse.  I refer to republicanism and democracy.  I refer to acceptance of the plurality of differences.  I refer to what Martin Luther King referred to as the arc of justice.

What is going on now is a tragedy — because it is destroying those values.   The values we hold in common.

 I ‘ve read plenty of SCOTUS opinions written by conservatives and appreciated them because of they made good law even though their conclusions clashed with my sense of how things out to be.  I and those justices who wrote those   decisions shared common values. 

It is different now.  Now reminds me of pre-Civil War America. 

The church?  The world can’t understand it? It is a political behemoth wearing a coat of many colors. it is not A church, but the name of  political power in the name of god.  The church used such political power for hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of years.  May I suggest the 30 Years War? The Counter Reformation?  May I suggest the battle between the church and the princes in the late Middle Ages?  And the conquest of Christian Europe by Islam?  These examples are just off the top of my head.

What’s to understand?   :)

Dan



> On Feb 11, 2024, at 2:38 PM, Philip Brownell <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> In reference to what you said below, “the twisting of ‘our’ values,” whose values? Values are entwined in politics. Also in spirituality. Also in morality. But there is no one size fits all supporter of Trump. There is no MAGA monolith; that is a creation of the left and a straw man talking point. There are people who share some values and differ on others who may also support Trump. Personally, I lament church leaders as it were making a Dorian Gray type bargain in the hope of getting some political goal, because the church will never get what it wants from the world. The world cannot understand the church. And when I say “church,” I’m not talking about the Constantinan hybrid that many people think is the church.
>
> The current electoral season is a cluster fuck that would have made for a comedic farce only ten years ago. Now it is a tragedy.
>
> Phil
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Feb 11, 2024, at 7:10 AM, Dan Bloom <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> To the extent the churches, synagogues, mosques, and temples stand by and watch the twisting of our values by MAGA, they are complicit. Since religions are supposed to be the source of morality, they have a greater duty to take moral stands than other institutions.   The only consistent moral stand I see then taking in all this is against the right to choose.  Fortunately, some religions push back against the right to life people.
>
> ______________
> Gstalt-L is an independent eCommunity of people interested in gestalt therapy theory and its various applications. Its public archives can be found at http://listserv.icors.org/scripts/wa-ICORS.exe?A0=GSTALT-L, and subscriptions can be managed by clicking on "Subscriber's Corner," which is found at the archives.

______________
Gstalt-L is an independent eCommunity of people interested in gestalt therapy theory and its various applications. Its public archives can be found at http://listserv.icors.org/scripts/wa-ICORS.exe?A0=GSTALT-L, and subscriptions can be managed by clicking on "Subscriber's Corner," which is found at the archives.
______________ Gstalt-L is an independent eCommunity of people interested in gestalt therapy theory and its various applications. Its public archives can be found at http://listserv.icors.org/scripts/wa-ICORS.exe?A0=GSTALT-L, and subscriptions can be managed by clicking on "Subscriber's Corner," which is found at the archives.


--
Peter (Philippson)
[log in to unmask]
______________ Gstalt-L is an independent eCommunity of people interested in gestalt therapy theory and its various applications. Its public archives can be found at http://listserv.icors.org/scripts/wa-ICORS.exe?A0=GSTALT-L, and subscriptions can be managed by clicking on "Subscriber's Corner," which is found at the archives.

______________ Gstalt-L is an independent eCommunity of people interested in gestalt therapy theory and its various applications. Its public archives can be found at http://listserv.icors.org/scripts/wa-ICORS.exe?A0=GSTALT-L, and subscriptions can be managed by clicking on "Subscriber's Corner," which is found at the archives.

______________ Gstalt-L is an independent eCommunity of people interested in gestalt therapy theory and its various applications. Its public archives can be found at http://listserv.icors.org/scripts/wa-ICORS.exe?A0=GSTALT-L, and subscriptions can be managed by clicking on "Subscriber's Corner," which is found at the archives.


--
Peter (Philippson)
[log in to unmask]
______________ Gstalt-L is an independent eCommunity of people interested in gestalt therapy theory and its various applications. Its public archives can be found at http://listserv.icors.org/scripts/wa-ICORS.exe?A0=GSTALT-L, and subscriptions can be managed by clicking on "Subscriber's Corner," which is found at the archives.

______________ Gstalt-L is an independent eCommunity of people interested in gestalt therapy theory and its various applications. Its public archives can be found at http://listserv.icors.org/scripts/wa-ICORS.exe?A0=GSTALT-L, and subscriptions can be managed by clicking on "Subscriber's Corner," which is found at the archives.


--
Peter (Philippson)
[log in to unmask]
______________ Gstalt-L is an independent eCommunity of people interested in gestalt therapy theory and its various applications. Its public archives can be found at http://listserv.icors.org/scripts/wa-ICORS.exe?A0=GSTALT-L, and subscriptions can be managed by clicking on "Subscriber's Corner," which is found at the archives.

______________ Gstalt-L is an independent eCommunity of people interested in gestalt therapy theory and its various applications. Its public archives can be found at http://listserv.icors.org/scripts/wa-ICORS.exe?A0=GSTALT-L, and subscriptions can be managed by clicking on "Subscriber's Corner," which is found at the archives.


--
Peter (Philippson)
[log in to unmask]
______________ Gstalt-L is an independent eCommunity of people interested in gestalt therapy theory and its various applications. Its public archives can be found at http://listserv.icors.org/scripts/wa-ICORS.exe?A0=GSTALT-L, and subscriptions can be managed by clicking on "Subscriber's Corner," which is found at the archives.

______________ Gstalt-L is an independent eCommunity of people interested in gestalt therapy theory and its various applications. Its public archives can be found at http://listserv.icors.org/scripts/wa-ICORS.exe?A0=GSTALT-L, and subscriptions can be managed by clicking on "Subscriber's Corner," which is found at the archives.