16:37 3-4-2014, Mario Malaguti:
>Le pronunciation de interlingua pro un italiano es como haber le 
>constante singulto.

Si. Illo es proque multe interlinguistas (al minus le poches que 
io audiva, e.g. Martijn Dekker in 
http://www.rhinospike.com/audio_requests/McDutchie/15916/#recordings) 
parla ben ma non ben liga le vocal al fin del un parola con le 
vocal al inition del sequente.

Le grammatica de Gode e Blair 
(http://www.interlingua.fi/gram/gramiaan.htm), nonobstante affirma:
==
Habitos native pote equalmente esser permittite prevaler in 
questiones de INTONATION, DURATION DE SONOS, e simile. Es 
suggerite, nonobstante, que le sequentia de un vocal final e un 
vocal initial, ambes non accentuate e non separate per un pausa 
in intonation, es pronunciate como un syllaba combinate glissante 
; p.ex. le alte Ural, quasi como si illo habeva le quatro 
syllabas le-ál-teu-rál.
==
(Traduction de Selahattin Kayalar. In le anglese original:)
==
§ 12. Native habits may likewise be allowed to prevail in 
questions of INTONATION, SOUND DURATION, and the like. It is 
suggested, however, that the sequence of a final and an initial 
vowel, both unstressed and not separated by a pause in 
intonation, be pronounced as a combined glide; e.g. le alte Ural 
almost as though it had the four syllables le-ál-teu-rál.
==


-- 
Ruud Harmsen, http://rudhar.com


--
Pro leger le archivos e pro modificar o cancellar le subscription:
http://listserv.icors.org/archives/interlng.html