LISTSERV - INTERLNG Archives - LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

	LISTSERV Archives
	INTERLNG Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Condense Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Mime-Version:	1.0
Content-Type:	text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed
Date:	Sat, 12 Dec 2015 08:41:01 +0100
Reply-To:	Discussiones in Interlingua <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:	Re: Interlingua, interlingua
From:	Ruud Harmsen <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:	<[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:	<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:	quoted-printable
Sender:	Discussiones in Interlingua <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (23 lines)

08:05 12-12-2015, Kjell Rehnström:
>Ego pote imaginar qual protestas on haberea del "ver" latinistas 
>"ad latinitatem fovendae"! :-) Ego ha anque vidite que on usa 
>"interlanguage" in alcun textos. Si isto es pro le causa que 
>"interlingua" quasi es occupate, ego non pote dicer.

Cetero, 'linguage' (non 'language', que es anglese) in 
interlingua ha un altere significato que 'lingua': le maniera de 
usar le lingua. jargon.

Como in le caso del grammatica e le vocabulario io dice: vamos 
lassar le nomine del lingua como es. Alterar lo non servi pro 
nihil, non promove interlingua, non stimula su uso e usantia, non 
divulga le notorietate.

-- 
Ruud Harmsen, http://rudhar.com


--
Pro leger le archivos e pro modificar o cancellar le subscription:
http://listserv.icors.org/archives/interlng.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG