From: Jay Bowks <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Code Six Four programa.


>Ecce un message de Bob Petry al lista Auxlang.
>In illo le Sr. Petry describe le prime televisate
>programma de su nove effortio pro promover
>Occidental Interlingue le qual ille ha re-baptisate
>Auli-Prim.
>Assi que il esserea interessante informar se del
>opportunitates pro facer un cosa similar pro le
>promotion de Interlingua in le Statos. Le
>compania de cablo in mi region es Time Warner,
>e como membro del Committee de Technologia
>del districto scholar local io poterea inquirer in re
>le disponibilitate de tempore al aere pro programmas
>educative. Le costos son extreme, ma con le adjuta
>de leges e arrangiamentos inter le providitores de
>cablo e le compania Time Warner il me pare que
>ha tempore libere pro programmas informative
>e educative pro le communitate. Io va essayar de
>informar me con plus detalios in re le opportunitates
>in mi area.
>
>Sincer e amicalmente,
>Jay B.
>--
>      [log in to unmask]
>             L(©¿©)K!
>http://adam.cheshire.net/~jjbowks
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Robert J. Petry, C.L.
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2000 4:12 PM
>Subject: Code Six Four programa.
>
>
>Ok, we did it. A little rough for the first one, but it was done.
>
>First caller, I'll let you guess from which IAL, just "happened" to tune
in.
>
>Told me his first reaction was to call the "national?" leader and ask him
if
>he knew what the langauge was, since I used AU.L.I. on the show.
>
>Answer, "Oh, don't worry about it, they come and they go." ;-)
>
>Well, this ain't one of 'em.
>
>He also explained to me how Occ had three verb endings, etc. Another
>continued myths that are carried on, and are totally misleading, even if
>done in "innocence". It's amazing how people carry on ideas that have been
>disproved over and over again, and they never get the point because they
>don't want to see. Ah, the wonders of our marvelous human nature.
>
>I enjoyed doing the program, but it was more difficult than I thought it
>would be because some of the equipment didn't work right, and one of the
>cameras wasn't working. So, all in all, I guess it wasn't too bad since it
>got a reaction clear to the "top". Wonder what the reaction will be after a
>year of programs? ;-)
>
>I know what I expect to happen, just wonder how long it will be before I
see
>what I expect?
>
>Cordialmen,
>Bob, x+O~
>