INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"INTERLNG: Discussiones in Interlingua" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Chris Burd <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 16 Jun 1999 14:45:46 -0400
Reply-To:
"INTERLNG: Discussiones in Interlingua" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
A martedi, 16 Jun 1999 14:35:14 -0400, STAN MULAIK <[log in to unmask]>
scribeva:

>Chris notava le suffixo -ada que pote esser un sustenite activitate:
>
>"destructada"?

Plustosto "destruada" (-ada non prende themas secundari).

"Habitantes del village describeva lo que esseva un destruada
al ultime minuta per serbos."

Io tende acceptar isto. Il se tracta del attitude verso le construction
active de parolas. Io lo favorisa - naturalmente non in le modo
irrestricte de esperanto - ma alteros pare esser plus conservative.

Chris

ATOM RSS1 RSS2