INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Martijn Dekker <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussiones in Interlingua <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 4 Apr 2009 21:54:59 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
At 17:57 +0200 02-04-2009, Lars Rosenmeier wrote:
>Io es toto de accordo que Wikipedia non es un loco pro propaganda!
>
>Io ha notate que le articulo super interlingua anque contine multe partes
>propagandistic. Vide puncto 15 e 16 del pagina de discussion:
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Interlingua#Serious_neutrality.2Fveracity_issues
>
>(Puncto 15 scribite per me in junio de 2008.)
>
>Martijn, quando va tu deler ille partes propagandistic?

Lars, viste que il es tu qui signalava le problema, que ha impedite
*te* de deler los? O, melio, cambiar los e render los plus accurate?

Securmente tu pote vider le differentia inter un articulo que
consiste integremente de autopromotion pompose, e un articulo general
e extense con alcun assertiones discutibile que probabilemente
deberea esser cambiate.

- M.

--
Archivos e disabonar: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/INTERLNG.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2