GAMBIA-L Archives

The Gambia and Related Issues Mailing List

GAMBIA-L@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
UDP United Kingdom <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The Gambia and Related Issues Mailing List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 3 May 2011 13:16:17 +0100
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 kB) , text/html (29 kB)
*''Seven months to elections and you cannot get to sit with any of the
parties and you see that as great success, reveals your delusional state. ''
*- Joe

Joe, that is a lie. You are clueness and know nothing other than farting.
UDP have sat down with all these parties except PDOIS since last year 2010.

1. Ousainu have had series of meetings with Oj at the latter's residence and
also at Ousainu's.

2. He [ousainu] had several meetings with Hamat and even had lunch together
on few occasions.

3. He also had extensive phone conversation with Mai Fatty which resulted in
the Gmc issuing a statement of intent to join a proposed UDP led alliance.

All these meetings were described by all parties as positive and fruitful
and none of them have expressed doubt or opposition to the concept of a UDP
LED ALLIANCE. These are the facts and we hope this will translate into an
alliance sooner rather than later.

 All indications are that these parties have a decision to make and they
will do so, as independent sovereign parties, at a time of their chosen. The
UDP can't impose that decision them. We can only negotiate and that is
exactly what we have done.

If these parties have a further issues they would like to see addressed, UDP
will be more than will to engage them once again and the decision to or not
to join a udp led alliance will still remain theirs, not UDP's.

Hey joe, I have got time for you, you know. As long as you continue to
shamelessly open your anus, I am more than happy to continue to sticking my
toe right inside and fickle it to your intestines.  Therefore and contrary
to your postulation, you are not distracting anyone here. As a matter of
fact, I feel really entertained by your rigorous ass opening exercise.

Daffeh

On 3 May 2011 09:17, Haruna Darbo <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Eh, I'm speaking to Daffeh. Giuseppe Get lost will you. I don't know Henry
> G. And please don't tell me about him. I'll find out for myself. All I know
> is he's not a good looking man.
>
> Haruna.
>
>
>
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Joe <[log in to unmask]>
> To: GAMBIA-L <[log in to unmask]>
>  Sent: Tue, May 3, 2011 4:11 am
> Subject: Re: [>-<] Re: Unofficial results of the Bye-elections leaked!!!
>
> Woooohhhhh, Harunasilo Have Mercy!  What alliance?  There are no
> discussions, it is all a gimmick. 'Cuse me, but you left our your
> Njago/Christian partner, Henry G?  The last time he was suppose to bring the
> "Kertiene" vote, wha' happen?  You mean to tell me you will forego the votes
> from Afdie to Mansajang, slicing right through Kunkujang?  You learned the
> hard way eh!  Not only did he pick your pocket, but you almost lost your
> draws.  Rashidiki, please stop pretending, you know dog on well the friggin
> answers to your questions.  It is a scheme you all are running.  Ousainou
> and OJ said they were talking and it is almost three years of zilch, ok.
>  UDP "Ponneh" Hamat to a UDP rally and choked him until he coughed and you
> all disperse in a Jambadong frenzy that Hamat is with you.  However, Blinker
> got the best of you all with his blitz that he is SICK and TIRED of playing
> second fiddle to Ousainou, but Grand Master D said Hamat and Housainou are
> still friends as if that was the issue.  UDP and Mai woke us up with a lot
> of noise about an alliance, but the trail turned cold before Takusane.
>  However, Grand Master D said UDP is waiting for Mai's Grand Landing for the
> great hug fest.  Ndeysaane, Chei Nattou!  The problem with you two squids is
> you missed that whole experience of Woulokono.  La Lay Kumaa Tama Larang Baa
> Kumaa......  Those that attended can continue.  Rashidiki, you sounded like
> one of them GRTS employees.[image: Wink]!
>
> Joe
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 00:38:41 -0400
> From: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [>-<] Re: Unofficial results of the Bye-elections leaked!!!
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
> Hon. Daffeh,
>
> My question therefore is:
>
> Why have UDP, NRP, GMC, & ppp NOT FORMED AN ALLIANCE then?????????????? Are
> they not capable of coming together after their discussions????? If they
> have other matter to sort out that is not related to an Alliance, why hold
> an Alliance hostage to those matters? And if one of these parties is not
> fully committed yet, why couldn't the other three form an Alliance?????????
> Is an Alliance of UDP-NRP-ppp-GMC contesting the presidential ballot be far
> superior to Hon. Hamat contesting for that ballot on a Solo NRP
> ticket??????????????
>
>  I hope you can share these questions with your partners in NRP, ppp, and
> GMC and inform us as to the answers.
>
> Haruna. I think I must be extremely dense in not understanding the
> psychology of humans. Not that I'm interested in that.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: UDP United Kingdom <[log in to unmask]>
> To: GAMBIA-L <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Mon, May 2, 2011 5:04 pm
> Subject: Re: [>-<] Re: Unofficial results of the Bye-elections leaked!!!
>
>  Joe, hold your farts there.  There is no problem with other parties i.e
> PPP, NRP and GMC. Our discussions with them went on well. There is not a
> single party among them who rejected the notion of a udp alliance. They have
> some other considerations to take into account and these are mainly about
> their own affairs, not the udp or the proposed. Even Hamat Bah said he is
> going to run solo has expressed support for a udp led alliance. He based his
> decision to go solo on the basis that other opposition parties, not udp, are
> not sincere on this coalition issue.  Hamat is still a good friend of
> ousainu.
>
> The Gmc has already published a statement of intent to be part of a udp led
> alliance and I believe once their party leader is on the ground to put that
> finishing touch on their preparations, things will lift up.
>
> I can't say anything about the PPP for confidentiality reasons.
>
> Thanks
> Daffeh
> On 2 May 2011 19:58, Joe Joe <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Ansu, for the last three years can you tell your fellow citizens why the
> opposition politicians could never meet that the rest of Gambia does not
> already know?  I assume you are a UDP supporter, if you claim that you have
> been wanting to meet with PDOIS and PDOIS does not want to meet with you,
> how come you have the same problem with PPP, NRP, GMC, GPDP etc.?  We keep
> hearing you folks repeat over and over again about wanting to talk, problem
> is it is all talk and finger pointing.  At a time when Gambians most needed
> to get the SOB out, your groups continues to thumb their nose of the demands
> of the voter.  I'm not sure how well you folks feel the pulse of the
> electorate, but participant groups in this disappointment will regret their
> act in both the short and long run.  It is very disappointing that you folks
> continue with the same sing song as the average Gambian is getting more
> desperate.
>
> Joe
>
> > Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 13:56:11 -0400
> > From: [log in to unmask]
>
> > Subject: Re: [>-<] Re: Unofficial results of the Bye-elections leaked!!!
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> >
> > Demba,
> >
> > Suntou did not say that the media is the problem. What he said is that
> the media should not be the medium for coalition negotiations. Wht he is
> emphasing is that the parties should sit a a table together to discuss and
> try to iron out their differences to try to form the needed coalition. There
> is nothing wrong with the media reporting information/news that they get
> from all quarters but they should not be substituted for the behind the
> scenes negotiations.
> >
> > Ansu
> >
> > Demba said:
> >
> > Suntou,
> >
> > Its amazing how the media become the soft target to blame in the failure
> of opposition parties and militants to get anything done in their quest for
> a way forward....
> >
> > The media is a facilitator and we only put out stuff that is sent to us
> by individuals or political parties. No one is calling for a coalition to be
> negotiated in the media... it is the most ridiculous claim I have ever heard
> on this discussion.
> >
> > The media put out agenda 2011 after it was sent to us for public
> digestion, there is nothing that stops anybody from either sending what you
> have or concealing it until you decide to put it out.
> >
> > To single out the media in this game reminds me of Sarah Palin's
> interview when she failed to live up to her expectations and then she turned
> to blame the media for asking the questions...
> >
> > We create an equal platform and anyone is free to send your stuff or go
> on any radio station and discuss what you want to discuss....
> >
> > How ironic is that the media playing its rightful role can become the
> soft target in the opposition failure to get any where...
> >
> > I think we all need to look inwards and focus on our failures rather than
> pointing fingers at each other... if opposition camps have done what they
> were supposed to be doing successfully, there wouldn't have been any need
> for a coalition... they could each win it on their own merits... it is that
> failure that necessitates a coalition.... I hope we each focus on our
> individual roles to persuade our leaders to do the right thing....
> >
> > The media will continue to play its role as the fourth estate....
> >
> > regards
> >
> > Demba
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 3:24 AM, suntou touray <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> > LJ
> > This is a key factor why rushing with ideas to the media is dangerous. It
> harden position because party militants would have buy into it and for this
> reason and others, to make our brothers in PDOIS sit with us is an unlikely
> posibility, hence the bigger division may surface in the Parliamentary
> elections after the Presidentail because there will be no reason to leave
> seat uncontested. We're making our beds, all expectations are that we will
> dive into them.
> > An excellent point.
> > Suntou
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Lamin Darbo <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Demba, and Musa
> >
> > In an ideal world, your views are incontestable, but the stakes are too
> high to discourage a robust exchange of ideas. As residents of the USA, I am
> in no doubt you are well aware of this.
> >
> > Agenda 2011 is an all or nothing proposal, and I think you should worry
> more about Halifa than Ousainou, or any other opposition leader in The
> Gambia, as far as a united front against the Professor. Through Agenda 2011,
> Halifa, and PDOIS, created a major roadblock to opposition unity, and
> effectively ensured some fragmentation in opposition ranks on November 24.
> God willing, I shall dilate on this contention.
> >
> > I think we should learn to call things by their names, and no amount of
> dancing around the edges of our difficulties is likely to solve the problems
> we must confront one way or the other.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > LJDarbo
> >
> >
> >
> > --- On Fri, 29/4/11, Demba Baldeh <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > From: Demba Baldeh <[log in to unmask]>
> >
> > Subject: Re: [>-<] Re: Unofficial results of the Bye-elections leaked!!!
> >
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> >
> > Date: Friday, 29 April, 2011, 23:00
> >
> >
> >
> > Suntou, absolutely every one in thr frontline knows the stakes. I believe
> long time ago that a meeting between party reps should take place without
> the main leaders who are holding this.
> >
> > Those reps will iron the issues, outline the points of contention and
> draft a path forward. If we believe that jammeh should not be the supreme
> leader of our country, we must expect the same of our other aspiring
> leaders, they must consent to the will of the people or get push aside... No
> blind loyalty without results.
> >
> > Brother Swaibou is a leader and credible one too and he does't have to go
> through this!! Where there is will there is a way!
> >
> > Demba
> > Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > From: suntou touray <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sender: The Gambia and Related Issues Mailing List <
> [log in to unmask]>
> > Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 22:41:10 +0100
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > ReplyTo: The Gambia and Related Issues Mailing List <
> [log in to unmask]>
> > Subject: Re: [>-<] Re: Unofficial results of the Bye-elections leaked!!!
> >
> >
> > Musa
> > I agree. The problem now is a window to make the guys talk. They can
> strengthen each other in many ways. As far I am aware, all of the leaders
> without a doubt know the enormous challenges they are facing. All sides
> should push for a middle ground, a common consensus on dialogue and
> accepting facts on the ground. The Gambia is changing fast. With Satellite
> disk in many households, global events are creating a tremendous awakening.
> Some are saying, GRTS is hardly watched by those with Satellite, which
> means, the work is cut out for the opposition if they speak with one voice.
> > Let us all continue creating the environment in ending suspicion and
> hostility.
> > Suntou
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Musa Jeng <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Suntou:
> >
> >
> >
> > It is indeed another disappointing result, but no surprises as long as we
> stick to the same strategy. The opposition will continue to lose elections
> as long as they refuse to make the bold concession- the very thing that the
> electorate will know can win. The biggest misconception or miscalculation,
> that somehow just putting up one party against the incumbent will prevent
> the splitting of the vote and can help the opposition. The opposition will
> continue to lose elections unless they exploit to the fullest the benefit of
> coalition of all parties.
> >
> > I am absolutely confident that if the entire opposition leadership spent
> two days in Wuli, and I am talking about Hamat, Sedfia, Halifa, OJ and
> Ousainou, and speak directly to the people of Wuli why they should vote for
> the opposition and not the incumbent, the results will be completely
> different.
> >
> > It is sad that even as we see the train wreck fast approaching, we will
> rather wait for our demise than do something about it. If this is not
> insanity – I am afraid to see the real insanity. Again Gentlemen, the
> pointing of fingers at each other is the easiest thing to do, of course
> burying our head in the sand will never help our predicament, and finally
> coming up with all sort of spinning to suityour own agenda does nothing to a
> disappointed electorate. The question is as a leader what will you do about
> it?
> >
> > Musa Jeng
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "suntou touray" <[log in to unmask]>
> >
> > To: [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask]
> >
> > Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 10:14:20 AM
> > Subject: [>-<] Re: Unofficial results of the Bye-elections leaked!!!
> >
> >
> > This is a disappointing news for our area people. Wulli East area has
> always gone for the incumbent party, since the times of Sainey Singhateh,
> Malang Saho etc. Wulli West is the more determine and militant region of the
> two. Suwaibou is well known in that area, I wonder what he should do to
> penetrate the elders and their local structures. I am sad for him, because
> he would have been a good MP.
> > I wonder whether his campaign team made use of the more active militants
> in Nyaikoi area. The signs were there that, going for the incumbent is a
> harden mole in Wulli East, I thought the Agenda 2011 would have dislodged
> such mindsets. Seriously, I was expecting a narrow marginal win for
> Suwaibou, but hey next time. I wish him all the best for the upcoming
> general elections.
> > Suntou
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:13 PM, M. Gassama <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> > The results have just been announced on GRTS confirming Gainako's
> > figures. Have a good evening.
> > Buharry.
> >
> > ----Original Message----
> > From: [log in to unmask]
> > Date: 2011-04-28 23:52
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Subj: Unofficial results of the Bye-elections leaked!!!
> >
> > Unofficial results of the bye-elections in Wuli East has been
> > leaked!
> >
> > Results at: http://www.gainako.com/news/
> > Thanks
> >
> > ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
> > To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L
> Web interface
> > at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
> >
> > To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to:
> http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
> > To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
> > [log in to unmask]
> > ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
> ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ To
> unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web
> interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
>  To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to:
> http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact the
> List Management, please send an e-mail to:
> [log in to unmask]¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
>
>
> ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ To
> unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web
> interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
> To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to:
> http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact the
> List Management, please send an e-mail to:
> [log in to unmask]¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
> ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ To
> unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web
> interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html To Search
> in the Gambia-L archives, go to:
> http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact the
> List Management, please send an e-mail to:
> [log in to unmask]¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
> ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ To
> unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web
> interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
> To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to:
> http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact the
> List Management, please send an e-mail to:
> [log in to unmask]¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
> ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ To
> unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web
> interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
>
> To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to:
> http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact the
> List Management, please send an e-mail to:
> [log in to unmask]¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
>


¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html

To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤

ATOM RSS1 RSS2