Wassa, you made some good points. I was looking for the answers to our quandries at the end but I couldn't get any. WHen you find answers to the questions you asked at the end, please don't forget to share them with us. You may find that the answers are the reasons the opposition parties, personalized and all, tried, at this stage of their readiness/non-readiness, to forge a COALITION. A coalition of limitations you might call it. Remmember to factor in time and intervening events when you collect your answers. Haruna. The opposition leaders are Gambians. Part of Gambian culture and society. I think we should concentrate on prosecuting the crimes of Yahya even while he is Frecident.
-----Original Message-----
From: Wassa Fatti <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Sat, Oct 24, 2009 3:09 pm
Subject: Re: UDP leader respond to OJ's untimely statement
Bro Karim,
I think I need to chip into the ongoing discourse around OJ's observation or comments that the opposition in the Gambia is "in comma". Lawyer Darboe's response is also done in good faith. It all now depends on interpretations from the rest of us, but what concern me in this case is how the issue is being trivialised in defending one party against the other. That will not benefit the parties involved in the defunct alliance (NADD) to draw any lesson from the mistakes that led to the failure of the alliance Gambians at home and abroad hoped to see to evolve into a more dynamic force challenging the brutal power ruling the country at the moment.
Is OJ wrong to make those comments? No. The reason is that any party that is not dead but inacitve could be considered to be in comma. Was Darboe's response to what O J said bad. No. The reason is that it has given us the insight as to why NADD failed. It has shown us why NADD as an alliance lacked strategy to evolve and change the nature of politics and the culture of parties in our country. The failure of NADD is a collective responsibility of all parties involved and so there is no need to single out one particular party. It makes matters worse when the need for another renewal of forging alliances rise again. It could happen again becuase there is no single party that could defeat this regime and no single party has the total answer for post Yaya regime. This is politics and politics is not mathematics where one can canculate to get the answers. There is nothing straight in politics, but contradicitions to be handled correctly.
What need to be learned here is the lack of strategy in the formation of NADD. There was nothing defined for all to understand and agreed upon. The MOU was a piece of signed paper that was not backed by any principle, because the reason for the alliance was not properly defined too. As a result, all the parties went into the alliance with an outmoded political culture. The parties that went into that alliance to formed NADD where all personalised parties. PDOIS was Halifa Sallah; PPP was OJ; UDP was Darboe. You can name the rest. Under such an alliance, personal ambition and interest is put above party or national interest and these tendencies infact aborted the birth of the new alliance before it was even born. This is why there was petty in fightings within NADD for leadership rather than devising and designing strategies to change the political culture from within.
The other failure of NADD was the lack of structure. This is also due to the fact that all the parties that came together to form NADD had no internal structures of their own and therefore the idea of modernising politics in the Gambia was not there in the first place. The NADD alliance needed a structure such as building shadow cabinet posts in oppostion. Let the capable individuals of the various parties that came together run the shadow cabinet posts to challenge the policies of their counter parts in government. This structure could have modernise Gambian politics and removed it from the outmoded tendencies of personalised partise. Failure to do so rendered them to share the political cloth with regime they want to oppose: personalised regime and personalised state. The state becomes a private state and the party a personalised party. The shadow cabinet posts would have allow the opposition to grow; enhance confidence and give experience of running a state; allow internal debate and disagreements and how to accept mistakes; it remove personal attacks in politics and concentrate on policies; the leader will be acountable to party principles and national interest and where a leader can not win elections will give way to another charicmastic person to try; it will produce programmes and agendas that the people can rally around for support as well as criticize.
The fact is that we need to be brutally frank about the failures of the oppostion so that we can deal with the causes. To9 blindly support these parties withour looking at their weaknesses will be fatal and opportunistic mistake that could deliver a bad tomorrow for all of us. We are living in a society that has changed for the worst, because the average family does not depend on the state for anything now adays. The remittance economy has produced new forms of subsistence living in the Gambia where people are no longer feeling internal social and economic pains, because the average family depends on those they shipped outside to Europe and America. They care less about collapsing health systems when their children in Europe or America are sending dollars or the sterling monthly. So they can afford to pay private Doctors. They pay less attention to collapsing schools, because their childrens' stay at home is temporary any way. After high school they will join offsprings in the West. If there is no rice, they have money to buy it some where. The pain of a bad state or governance is not felt as it was felt in the 1960s, 1970s and up to the 1980s. This is another factor underming the oppostion parties that has no agenda to motivate the people.
So what we all need to do instead of pointing fingers at other parties, is to ask tangible questions for answers from those who want to lead us tomorrow, but we must try and answer in order find answer to the present of the oppositon. I will put few here:
1) What tecnical and political means at present is available for this regime to maintain itself in power? We must remeber that dictatorial regimes must use certain means to stay in power.
2) What were the circumstances in which this regime managed to establish itself in power?
3) Has its continuity, regardless of the means by which it has maintained power, been significant factor in the creation of the weakenesses of the oppostion or the silence of the people in the midst of social and economic hardships?
4) Or has the regime stayed long enough and powerful enough to mould the opposition to its taste or determine their future demise or disintegration?
As long as we raise such questions and get answers, we will be able to develop strategies in creating a new alliance for the future.
Wassa.
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 17:42:43 +0100
From: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: UDP leader respond to OJ's untimely statement
To: [log in to unmask]
Lamin
Ousainou Darboe's interview revealed a lot that happened. It is about time the online media to gathered Assan Musa Camara to also speak out. PPP are the once in a state of coma and it is about time for OJ Jallow to stop his newspaper headline grapping and engaging their membership. Deep rooted anatagonism and division they created in PPP is what they extended into NADD. They failed to realize that the political landscape of our country have change and endorsement of a major opposition party to lead the coalition is the only political capital to end the continuum of Yahya Jammeh's madness, but they turn the show to pettiness, back bitting, double standard etc. Where is OJ now? Silence! Did PPP organise any political meeting or enagaed with their grass roots structure? The answer is no? Where big mouth Lamin Waa Juwara? Join the rank of Yahya Jammeh and playing the ball to creat further confusion as part of his trademark.
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 14:19:18 +0000
From: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: UDP leader respond to OJ's untimely statement
To: [log in to unmask]
I agreed with you karim, it is the PPP ,NDAM and GDPD that is in a state of coma, but not the UDP and PDOIS because they still have members in parliament who are very active .I agreed with the UDP leader for saying that peoples should think hard when some politicians made some political statements.
NADD fails because of peoples like Waa Juwara, I agreed with Dbaldeh at the bantaba saying that (level headed leaders like Darboe, Halifa and others would allow such childish behaviour to take over our national interest). The real Truth is that NADD wants to used the grassroots support base of the UDP, and did not want to respect views and opinions from the UDP executives.
I think that there were credible candidates to select from the UDP to lead Nadd coalition(Yaya Jallow or Kemesseng),since some of the nadd executives was not ready to accept Darboe to lead the coalition.
I believe that any Gambian who comes after Jammeh will be better than Jammeh.Jammehs actions and behaviour is totally different with Gambian culture, tradition and way of life.
Dampha
Nema
.
--- On Sat, 24/10/09, abdoukarim sanneh <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
From: abdoukarim sanneh <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: UDP leader respond to OJ's untimely statement
To: [log in to unmask]
Date: Saturday, 24 October, 2009, 10:23
It is a honest opinion that it is PPP that is in a state of coma. It is about time its membership to be honest and stop trying to be newspaper headline grapping politicians.
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 18:58:09 -0400
From: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: UDP leader respond to OJ's untimely statement
To: [log in to unmask]
Thanx Suntou for sharing the W9Y. And then some. If Ousainou had continued his membership in NADD with this odious chicanery, I would have personally disowned him. The Darbo's don't friggin roll that way. We do not go along to get along and we damn sure don't play with politics. It is serious business because it is the people's business. The people do not want rogues replacing Yahya. That will be upon their death. JDAM I don't wanna hear it. So you can forget the acronym NADD. Bye! Haruna.
-----Original Message-----
From: suntou touray <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Thu, Oct 22, 2009 11:41 am
Subject: UDP leader respond to OJ's untimely statement
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lawyer Darboe Explains Reasons Behind NADD’s Failure
y Saikou Ceesay
The leader of the biggest opposition United Democratic Party has
leared the air over assertions of other opposition members that
ambian oppositions are in a state of "coma", saying that even though
e respects the expressions of opinions of by any individual, he does
ot see that as a fact.
"What he [OJ] said is not a fact but an opinion and even if he was
tating facts, those facts are not applicable to the UDP Party. If
here is anything, it is his party that is in a state of ‘coma’. How
an one say that a party is in a state ‘coma’ when UDP party has four
lected National Assembly Members, one of whom is a member of the
COWAS Parliament? How can one say that UDP is in a state of ‘coma’
hen the party is actively engaged in grassroots mobilization?
In an exclusive interview with The Daily News, Darboe said UDP Youth
ing have recently concluded a nationwide tour. A women wing has also
ust mobilized a rally at Bakau. "It is because of the popularity of
he UDP that even those members of other opposition parties lay claim
o membership of UDP when they switch allegiance to the ruling APRC
arty. With all due respect to OJ, his assertion that the opposition
s in a state of "coma" is incorrect in so far as the UDP is
oncerned, and I know as a fact that the NRP is as active as it was in
996", Darboe explained.
According to Darboe, he had known from the Chairman of PPP Yahya
eesay that PPP is not interested in supporting a candidate. "Infact
he majority of those who signed the documents for the registration of
PP have made it clear that they are not interested in supporting a
andidate but instead, to regain their assets seized", he said. But at
hat selection, Mr. Omar Jallow was nominated, and when my deputy
ahya Jallow told him that, "look your party PPP is not interested in
upporting a candidate", OJ responded that he is NADD and not PPP.
Mr. Yahya Jallow nominated me and there was no representative who
econded his nomination. Mr. Halifa Sallah was nominated but later,
is nomination was withdrawn but someone from NDAM said OJ is the one
ominated. And I said, "But look there has to be consensus and we said
e (UDP) have not agreed". The following Saturday when they convened,
r. Halifa Sallah was nominated by Mr. Sam Sarr, editor of Foroyaa
ewspaper and they said that it was a mistake to have withdrawn
alifa’s previous nomination.
Darboe explained that the re-nomination of Halifa Sallah to him showed
omething different. He said there were few members of his executive
ho were against his resignation and they tried to convince him to
tay on so that they can work out a solution to the impasse.
"On the 7 February, I tendered my resignation from NADD the political
arty and indicated that the UDP was committed to the Memorandum of
nderstanding signed in 2005 and that it would be to the UDP to decide
n its continuous membership of the alliance. The Chairman Mr. Hassan
usa Camara said he was not accepting the resignation letter because
e wanted to work on me to reverse my decision. I however promised
hat I will withhold the copies of my resignation to the press and
EC, which I did".Below is the excerpt of the interview…..
Is it true that the opposition parties are in a state of “coma” as
tated by Omar Jallow alias OJ?
Every person has a right to his opinion and I always respect
xpressions of opinion by any individual. I do have respect for
r.Jallow and I appreciated his expression of opinion about the state
f the opposition. What he said is not a fact it’s an opinion and even
f he was stating facts those facts are not applicable to the UDP
arty. If anything it’s his party that is in a state of “coma”. How
an one say that a party is in a state “coma” when UDP party has four
lected National Assembly Members, one of whom is a member of the
COWAS Parliament. How can one say that UDP is in a state of “coma”
hen the party is actively engaged in grass root mobilization. Our
ouths have recently concluded a nation wide tour. A women’s wing has
ust mobilized a rally at Bakau.It is because of the popularity of the
DP that even those members of other opposition parties lay claim to
embership of UDP when they switch allegiance to the ruling APRC
arty. With all due respect to OJ his assertion that the opposition is
n a state of “coma” is incorrect in so far as the UDP is concerned
nd I know as a fact that the NRP is as active as it was in 1996.
What can you tell us about the country’s multi-party system as we speak now?
The Gambians are struggling to have a real multi-party system in the
ountry; the fact that we have many registered political parties does
ot in itself guarantee multi-partyism.The environment within which
hese parties operate is the factor that determines the existence or
on existence of multi-partyism.It is obvious that the current
nvironment is very hostile to the growth of multi-partyism.The
pportunities accorded to the ruling APRC party in the dissemination
f their views through the national media is denied the opposition
arties. The independent press which could serve as a credible medium
or dissemination of opposition views is under very serious threats,
ntimidation, harassment and cajoling. Other institutions that are
upposed to serve as bulk-walks to support multi-partyism all bow to
he wishes and dictates of President Jammeh and his ruling party. What
s required is to create conducive environment which allows for the
peration of multi-partyism.
In one of our editions published Gambians have expressed lack of
onfidence in the opposition parties as they have failed in the
ormation of NADD coalition. What is your opinion on this?
I appreciate the fact that every Gambian has right of opinion on every
articular issue and Gambians are entitled to have their views on
pposition alliance. I have in the past resisted to answer any
uestion or make comment on why I resigned from NADD.I have always
eferred people to Mr.Hassan Musa-Camara who was Chairman of NADD.I
ave always believe that Mr.Camara will give unbiased and an impartial
iew of events to the Gambian people from the first day of the
egotiation to establish (NADD)to the day I resigned.However,recent
omments in the Foroyaa Newspaper by Mr.Halifa Sallah in his way
orward as well as Mr.OJ urging the Daily news to ask Hamat Bah and I
hy we resigned, I can no longer be silent and leave Gambians with the
elief that Mr. Bah and I were the obstacles to an opposition
lliance.
Mr.Ceesay in 2004, all the parties agreed on the need to form an
lliance for opposition parties and this need became more urgent and
pparent when the constitution was amended by introducing a simple
ajority for Presidential elections. Hitherto a Presidential candidate
ould be declared duly elected if he obtains more than 50% of the
otes validly cast at the elections. We all felt it made more sense to
ave an alliance of opposition parties so that we do not have split
otes to the opposition. The UDP was very committed to the idea and
ecause of that we agreed to be at par with all other opposition
arties. We agreed to have equal representation and equal voice with
ven an untested party like NDAM,we agreed to have equal voice and
qual representation with a party such as PPP which had a committee
nly in Serrekunda.We also agreed to be at par with PDOIS which did
ot even poll more than 5% at the 2001 Presidential elections. I know
s a fact that non of the leaders of these parties would have accepted
his sort of arrangement if they had the political dominance UDP
njoyed. We conducted all the negotiations on the basis of having an
lliance of opposition parties. We did not discuss and agree on the
erger of political parties or the creation of new political parties.
he opening words of the preamble are “We, the undersigned
epresentatives of opposition political parties, who seeked to
stablish an alliance…….” Under part one of the Memorandum of
nderstanding (MOU) the alliance was established and article one
tates “an alliance is hereby established. The name of the alliance is
ational Alliance for Democracy and Development (NADD) with the
cronym (NADD).Then article four states amongst other things “all
pposition parties who are signatories to this MOU shall be founding
embers of the alliance. The selection of candidate for the alliance
or Presidential, National Assembly and Council elections should be by
onsensus but if there is an impasse then selection must be by Primary
lection which will be restricted to party delegates and there would
e equal member of delegates comprising a chairman and youth leader of
very party from village, ward and constituency.
These are some of the most important provisions in the MOU, what we
ave opted to do by MOU is to set up an alliance of opposition
arties. Obviously the criteria set for the selection of candidates
ould be met only by the UDP. PDOIS did not have the following to meet
he criteria, nor did the PPP or NRP.It was only UDP that had the
apacity and following to meet this criteria. It is common knowledge
hat the MOU was signed in 2005.At that ceremony something happened
hich would have aborted the signing ceremony. The UDP delegation
omprising me and my deputy Mr.Yahya Jallow went to that ceremony to
ign the MOU on behalf of UDP and make a statement that is appropriate
n such occasions. Before the commencement of the ceremony I was given
document virtually an oath declaring commitment.OJ told me he was
eeing it for the first time and I was going to either walk out or
efuse to sign the declaration. But there were four gentlemen in the
ssembly, Mr. Sam Johns,Dr.SJ Pama,Alagie Ba Trawalley and Dr.Sheriff
eesay to whom I deferred because I have enormous respect for these
eople and I think it would be out of place for me not to conform with
his unexpected development. This development to me showed insincerity
nd a lack of openness on the part of whoever might have drafted that
eclaration and brought it to the ceremony without consulting my
arty. Nonetheless UDP remain committed to the MOU. After the signing
f the MOU some members of the alliance conscious of UDP’s dominance
ame to the conclusion that if a Presidential candidate were to be
elected under the MOU, the UDP being the dominant opposition
olitical party would produce a candidate and they did not want to
upport a candidate running in the name of UDP.So they flouted and the
iscussion to register NADD as a political party really took at least
hree months. In fact I presented a scenario to them if the
ndependent Electoral Commission (IEC) were to invite me to a meeting
s leader of UDP while I am also a member of NADD,a registered
olitical party and an issue arises between UDP and NADD which one
ill I support. I continuously advised them against the registration
f NADD as a political party. During one of the meetings when I came
ery hard in my arguments one of the party leaders walked out of the
eeting called some people in the United States to say that Darboe and
DP are creating obstacles for us. And before we left the meeting it
as on the Freedom Newspaper, and me and my party are being portrayed
s anti-united opposition when infact the anti-united opposition are
hose who refused to accept the reality of the fact that the MOU
igned did not call for the establishment of a new political party.
nd I remember, I think it was on the 16 April 2005,I said since you
re insisting go and register it. When the constitution of NADD, the
olitical party, was presented by Managing editor of Foroyaa Newspaper
am Sarr to the IEC for registration he reported he was asked certain
uestions. This made the Chairman Mr.Hassan Musa Camara to ask Sam
arr to go and withdraw the document he submitted at the IEC for
egistration but it was too late.
Now what followed the Registration of (NADD)?
All the opposition seats in the National Assembly were lost, although
hree of them were regained following the bye-elections. And in fact
hen the court made the ruling I told all of them that with my little
nderstanding of the Gambian constitution I know this is what would
ave happened. I also hinted that I will be considering my position in
ADD viz a viz UDP because it is legally impossible for me to be a
ember of two different political parties and I cannot abandon UDP for
new party.
In 2005, before I left for the United States, Musa Drammeh of the then
PP and Mr.Hassan Musa-Camara invited me to a short discussion at
hich they also requested the presence of Alhagie M.C Cham because
usa Drammeh knew Alagie MC Cham could influence my decision on
ertain matters. Musa Drammeh pleaded with me that I should continue
y membership of NADD because my departure from NADD would have some
dverse consequences on candidates who were to contest those
ye-elections.Mr.Drammeh initiated this move because the previous day
J was on BBC network Africa programme saying that anyone who resigned
rom NADD would be committing a political suicide. This was an
pparent reference to me because I had earlier indicated to the
xecutive of NADD that I would consider my position in NADD.Out of
espect for Hassan Musa Camara, Alhagie MC Cham and Musa Drammeh I
cceded to Mr.Drammeh’s request. I was the only political leader who
ent to all the constituencies and appealed to the UDP supporters to
ote for the NADD candidates. And I personally met all my expenses; I
on’t even rely on even my party to meet the cost of my travels and
ther expenses. I did so because I wanted to see that candidates
unning on NADD ticket won their seats notwithstanding my earlier
isagreement to register NADD as an opposition party.
Around December 2005, there was talk of celebrating the first
nniversary of the founding of NADD and I insisted you cannot go to
he public and celebrate without NADD having a leader. My insistence
ed the way for them to select a flag bearer. I had known from the
hairman of PPP Yahya Ceesay that PPP was not interested in supporting
candidate, infact the majority of those who signed the documents for
he registration of PPP have made clear that they are not interested
n supporting a candidate but instead to regain their assets seized.
But at that selection Mr. Omar Jallow alias OJ was nominated, and when
y deputy Yahya Jallow told him that look your party PPP is not
nterested in supporting a candidate. OJ responded that he is NADD and
ot PPP.Mr.Yahya Jallow nominated me and there was no representative
ho seconded his nomination.Mr.Halifa Sallah was nominated but later
is nomination was withdrawn but someone from the National Democratic
ction Movement (NDAM) said OJ is the one nominated and I said but
ook there has to be consensus and we said we (UDP) have not agreed.
he Following Saturday when they convened Mr.Halifa Sallah was
ominated by Mr. Sam Sarr editor of Foroyaa Newspaper and they said
hat it was a mistake to have withdrawn Halifa’s previous nomination.
I discussed the situation with senior members of my executive in
ipeline here and I told them that I think it is time for me to resign
rom NADD because I did not believe that the other party leaders are
incerely committed to the idea of a united opposition as I was. I
lso felt that I was an obstacle to those who were aspiring to be flag
earers for NADD.I told members of the executive that if their was
incerity among the leaders they would have worked out a consensus
round the candidature of Mr.Jallow but the re-nomination of Halifa
allah to me showed something different. There were few members of my
xecutive who were against my resignation and they tried to convince
e to stay on so that they can work out a solution to the impasse.
On the 7 February I tendered my resignation from NADD the political
arty and indicated that the UDP was committed to the Memorandum of
nderstanding signed in 2005 and that it would be left to the UDP to
ecide on its continuous membership of the alliance. The Chairman
r.Hassan Musa-Camara said he was not accepting the resignation letter
ecause he wanted to work on me to reverse my decision. I however
romised that I will withhold the copies of my resignation to the
ress and IEC which I did. Prior to that NADD set-up a committee to
ork out the qualifications to be satisfied by anyone before being
elected as NADD flag bearer. My deputy Mr.Jallow refused to nominate
nyone to represent UDP on that committee but the chairman prevailed
emeseng Jammeh to do so. And when this committee met they came out
ith seven point criteria to be satisfied by anyone. On the day I
endered my resignation I made it quite clear to all of them that
here was clear lack of sincerity and I and my party will not
ubscribe to any qualification or criteria that is not contained in
he constitution of the republic of the Gambia. Since I am an obstacle
resigned, you can go ahead and do what you want.
Even when I resigned from NADD and OJ conceded to Halifa Sallah, Lamin
aa Juwara put forward his candidature in opposition to Halifa Sallah.
ou see the lack of sincerity and lack of commitment on the part of
hose who professed to be champions of the united opposition in the
ambia. This is synopsis of what led to my resignation from NADD.I
ave omitted from this narration, the various campaigns launched
gainst me in the US when the leadership of NADD went to the US
upposedly to sell NADD to Gambians in the US whilst I was busy in the
upreme Court trying to save the Parliamentary seats that were lost. I
ave also omitted to mention the various clandestine efforts made by
ome members of NADD during the period that I was defending some of
hem against the charges brought against them before Justice
aul.Hamat Bah resigned from NADD to join the UDP in an alliance
ecause he faced an accepted reality that in politics it is the number
hat matters and UDP had the largest following and it made more sense
or anyone really committed to restore true democracy that we yearn
or should give his support to the UDP and that is what Mr. Bah did.
What do you think is the way forward for the country’s opposition parties?
Those who are in leadership position of parties must accept the fact
hat Gambians know that the ultimate decision in electing any
overnment is theres.We the political leaders must also accept the
hat we do not have all the ideas that can take this country out of
his hostile political environment and move the country forward. We
ust not be presumptuous and we must disrobe ourselves from the
lothes of self-righteousness believing that we are the only ones
apable of doing things right. Self perpetuation or a
elf-perpetuating government must be eschewed. When we talk about self
erpetuating government does the Gambia have such a history? Now was
he PPP government a self perpetuating government? Why would anybody
hink that if Hamat Bah is voted into office he will run a self
erpetuating government? Why would anyone think that a UDP government
ould be a self perpetuating one?
These are some of the thinking some of the political leaders must
iscard and come to terms with the fact that there is no party leader
ho would perpetuate himself in power. My own personal history shows
bsolute and uncompromising adherence to constitutionalism. Thirty-six
ears of standing in support of the constitution of the Gambia at all
evels demonstrates and provides testimony that if I do not enforce
he present constitution I will not do anything that would not go down
ell with the wishes of the Gambian people. The executive of the UDP
s meeting to consider proposals submitted to it for a united
pposition front and for me it will not be proper at this stage to say
hat such a united front should take.
Source: The Daily News
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
o unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web
nterface
t: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
o contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
���������������������������������������������������������� To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to: [log in to unmask] ����������������������������������������������������������
New Windows 7: Find the right PC for you. Learn more.
���������������������������������������������������������� To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to: [log in to unmask] ����������������������������������������������������������
New Windows 7: Find the right PC for you. Learn more.
New Windows 7: Find the right PC for you. Learn more.
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
|
