GAMBIA-L Archives

The Gambia and Related Issues Mailing List

GAMBIA-L@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
suntou touray <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The Gambia and Related Issues Mailing List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 30 Jan 2011 11:49:55 +0000
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (5 kB) , text/html (6 kB)
*Kemo Kinteh brought this mail to our attention after his rejoinder to the
Freedom palava and Falai V UDP U.S. It seems independence of editorship is a
privelege, we will get round it.....*


UDP US Chapter didn’t misled freedom radio Audience

Dear Editor (Mr. Mbye),

Please kindly allow me to set the records straight in regards to who is
wrong and right on the dispute between Mr. Faila Baldeh and the US section
of the UDP. I listened to the radio dispute.

Your editorial caption seems to defend Mr. Faila Baldeh and rejects the UDP
US section as populist non-tolerant Mandinka folks trying to undermine
internal critics. However the venue of this dispute is not anymore internal
or within UDP, instead Mr. Baldeh has brought his grievances to your medium
thus the UDP has to treat it as such and react to it as if it is a public
dispute. It would have been a tactical suicide if they take it lightly.

Your role as publisher and editor is clear and you did that quite well in
this matter. That is, you brought discontented party member grievances to
the limelight of the public. It’s important that members as well as non
members have the media where they can report and spread their views. This is
helpful because it sometimes forces the party or association to listen
better to its members or in any case their stakeholders. Now the question is
whether Mr. Baldeh has chosen the best media to voice out his views or not?

I think he has not chosen well if he is a member of the UDP party. The UDP
has many channels to voice out such grievances and he should have exhausted
all those channels of influences before coming out with this topic at a time
when the party is consolidating its resources for an election year. Because
everyone knows that such change has to be effected way back before the
election year. If UDP will change Lawyer Darboe they will require a huge
logistical and advertisement undertaking to sell the new person to Gambians.
Secondly such changes cannot be forced through a newspaper which as an
entity is following its entitled goals and objectives, which a big party
like the UDP can’t afford to react to. Leadership change must be a long term
strategic objective which should only be abruptly changed in case of
emergency.

However Mr. Baldeh has chosen well if he is just a voter and voted for the
UDP many times and want them to change strategy. I don’t dispute his loyalty
to the party and therefore as a voter he has the right to get something for
his efforts and vote. By going to the press he can stimulate a constructive
discussion and since we are in an election year we can all debate the merits
and demerits of a leadership change in this crucial year for our country.
But by giving the impression that he is talking on behave of the UDP, which
is unfortunate since such discussion should be made in closed door UDP
meeting as a party member. If a member of any club just goes online and
charges his own club of cruelness and tribalism then we question the motives
of such actions.

The reaction of the UDP section is understandable because it’s about
defending unity and morale within their ranks. They show that you can only
talk for them if they give you the allowance to so. Otherwise you have to do
so as an entitled private voter. Any organizations from enterprises to even
families have their rules governing what should be said outside and how it
should be said. In this line of argument I think the editor’s call for the
disbanding of the UDP US section is premature and cannot be in the true
interest of the Party.

I will conclude on tribalism because very often when we discuss national
issues, the notion of Mandinka intolerance implicitly comes out. This
dispute is no exception. I think we can even turn it around and say that
there is an increasing intolerance towards Mandinka contributors to the
media and even discomfort among some people of other ethnic origin that UDP
has many Mandinka supporters. This I find disturbing because for example the
biggest base of opposition to Jawara rule came from the Mandinkas in the
Gambia. The consequence of such a prejudice can also lead to the hardening
of the Mandinka ethnic group one day or the other. This is not what we want.
We want national identification and that cannot be achieved if we push
anyone or group to the sidelines.

Kemo Kinteh Switzerland


-- 
Surah- Ar-Rum 30-22
"And among His signs is the creation of heavens and the earth, and the
difference of your languages and colours. Verily, in that are indeed signs
for men of sound knowledge." Qu'ran

www.suntoumana.blogspot.com


¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html

To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤

ATOM RSS1 RSS2