"you dream of regularly for keeping the criminal APRC in power and
scuppering the UDP's ascendency to the helm of government.  Bring it on, Mr"
Paco Modou Mboge

The Gambia is the property of every single one of us. The UDP is a party in
the country with popular support, if that torment you to th extend that,
whenever a member like me write something, your vains plunge into unbearable
pain, well keep as much paracetamol as possible.
I am a UDP member and will speak for them when necessary. However as i said,
if the economist magazine wrote something on the Gambia, i will read it with
an open mind. I shall not be unfair because the person who quoted it is
somebody i don't like. As for your comments on my self-righteousness, i
guess you forgot where to package such comments.
Read about things before you rushing to conclusion. Can you now then tell us
if the Economist is wrong to write the things they did. It will do your
heart some good if you analyse the article in much  sober way.
Here is it again, if you missed it the first time round:

*Divisionists beware
*President Paul Kagame has improved people’s lives at the expense of freedom
Mar 4th 2010 | NAIROBI | From The Economist print edition
Kagame, progressive and repressive
*THE government of Rwanda is doing a lot of things right. It is pretty open
in its handling of aid money. Most foreign governments and charities are so
impressed by its detailed plans and apparent lack of corruption that they
are funnelling more of their aid directly through Rwanda’s government.
President Paul Kagame says he expects direct budget support to rise by a
quarter this year, to $519m*.
The country has recovered valiantly from its year zero in 1994, when 800,000
Tutsis and moderate Hutus were slaughtered. Its centralised state is leading
the way in economic and technological reform in the region. It is improving
the country’s infrastructure, education and farming, and seeks to preserve
its ecology. It pushes equality for women, who comprise half the government
and parliament.
On the diplomatic front, Mr Kagame has been equally successful. He has sent
troops to help keep the peace in Sudan’s Darfur province and elsewhere. He
has stood up to mighty France, blaming it, as the region’s then most
influential Western power, for failing to prevent the genocide. And last
month the French president, Nicolas Sarkozy, came to Rwanda and offered
something close to an apology. France, he said, had committed “grave errors
of judgment” before, during, and after the genocide. Questions linger about
the role of French special forces during the killing, as well as the fate of
Hutus living in France whom Rwanda wants extradited on suspicion of
involvement in the genocide.
*France, for its part, has not dropped charges against some members of Mr
Kagame’s government who are alleged to have ordered the shooting down of a
French aircraft carrying Rwanda’s then president, Juvénal Habyarimana, a
Hutu; that action triggered the genocide. Yet both countries now appear more
at ease with each other. Days after Mr Sarkozy’s visit, Mr Habyarimana’s
widow, Agathe, was arrested near Paris (and then freed on bail) for
questioning over her alleged role in the genocide. French businessmen came
in Mr Sarkozy’s slipstream, eyeing minerals and timber in neighbouring
Congo, for which Rwanda is a conduit. “There is no doubt this is a
reconciliation,” says a Rwandan government figure.
*Yet awkward question-marks hang over Mr Kagame and his ruling Rwandan
Patriotic Front. *The president’s detractors say his party has not owned up
to killing thousands of civilians immediately after the genocide or to
responsibility for causing much bloodshed in Congo, which it invaded in
order to hunt down the génocidaires who had fled there. The Congolese
government, it may be noted, has co-operated with the Rwandans in their more
recent incursions into Congo.
Mr Kagame and his government are stifling political and press freedom in
advance of a presidential election due in August. He is almost certain to
win but evidently he is determined to secure a big majority to implement his
“one Rwanda” policies*. Opposition parties have been forbidden to “use words
or facts that defame other politicians”. In practice, the government can
label any criticism against it as “divisionism”, which entitles it to lock
up the offenders. Members of the opposition say they are spied on and
bullied.
It is unclear whether the government will let the Democratic Green Party, a
feisty new opposition group, be registered. If not, the Greens say they will
back another lot, the Socialist Party-Imberakuri, which should be able to
run a presidential candidate. The head of a third opposition party, the
United Democratic Forces-Inkingi, Victoire Ingabire, says she has been
vilified since returning from exile in January. The government, she says,
has encouraged people to assault her, accusing her of being a génocidaire.
This week a former military intelligence chief, Kayumba Nyamwasa, who was
reported to have joined the Greens, fled Rwanda and is said to be claiming
asylum in South Africa. The government says he is wanted on criminal
charges—presumably divisionism.
End.
Your esteem analysis please Mr Mboge. Africa awaits your intellectual
thoughts here. Analyse please.
Suntou
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Modou Mboge <[log in to unmask]>wrote:

> *"The economist Magazine has nothing to lose or gain in the articles some
> of its commentators write about Africa. Can we for once see things in their
> right context instead fancying around hanging onto our own baggage of
> partisan politics. If anyone is educated in the west, you must without a
> question read books, be lectured by western professors and enjoy the western
> way of live. What moral ground do you have to see others as less of an
> African than you are? Below is the Economist Magazine's article on Kegame
> and Rwanda. In fact the article acknowledge the level of financial
> discipline the government of Kegame is instituting, yet the other facts
> cannot be left unspoken about because one is doing something’s right and
> other major wrongs. We should delineate cheap emotion from serious issues"
> Suntou Touray*
>
> Trash, inchoate and the usual  pretentious bellicose ranting from our 'Mr
> Keen Political'.  What the fuck do you know about Pan-Africanism? Im all
> ears to hear proof than publications such as the Economist have no agendas
> when it comes to Africa.  So just being educated in the West and reading
> Western books and enjoying Western live, one is suppose to stay mute.  *What
> is a Western life style anyway? * *I will not apologise for staying in the
> West.  I owe nothing to Western people or Western governments. *   *Educate
> me Mr ' Keen political observer'* For a flea-like thinking clueless
> self-possessed self-righteous idiotic creature like you
> no surprise  the hallucination that people want to make youn seem like
> an uncaring African? and how can i make you look like one anyway.  Being the
> bloody crank you are, aren't you the one who with your confused perception
> of being critical keep lashing around folks who are doing their best to
> alieviate the lot of their brothers and sisters.  I guess those who do not
> the see the way you see things are either sycophants or incapable of
> thinking for themselvess.  And talking about people doing the right thing
> going home rather than staying in the West and asking question what are
> u doing here anyway?.
> And since love of Africa is so profound to you, what are u doing in the
> West Midlands? Gambia and the UDP needs your service on the ground.  With
> a gift of seeing things where ordinary folk can't  and being so highly
> educated, are you not wasting yourself here in the UK.  Your 'acclaimed
> political insights' may well be effective back in Gambia especially in
> exposing your fancied enemy whom you dream of regularly for keeping the
> criminal APRC in power and scuppering the UDP's ascendency to the helm of
> government.  Bring it on, Mr
>
> Mboge
>   On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:17 AM, suntou touray <[log in to unmask]>wrote:
>
>>  The gentle man who wishes to make some us look like uncaring Africans,
>> hence not qualify in advocating anything African should take a good at
>> himself and his place of domicile. Many a times we read and hear our
>> Pan-Africanist brothers resident in Europe and America for decades lecturing
>> us about Euro-American this and that on Africans.. How self-serving these
>> brothers are.
>>
>>
>>
>> If you wish to take the moral high ground on Africa, then do the decent
>> thing and parachute to the West, East, South or Central Africa, then try
>> screaming from the rooftop there, hopefully people will pay attention to the
>> nonsensical out pouring of cheap emotion. Some of this So call
>> Pan-Africanist hardly ever venture into Africa, yet they feel singing
>> Pan-Africa enough in making words relevant, give us a break.
>> The economist Magazine has nothing to lose or gain in the articles some of
>> its commentators write about Africa. Can we for once see things in their
>> right context instead fancying around hanging onto our own baggage of
>> partisan politics. If anyone is educated in the west, you must without a
>> question read books, be lectured by western professors and enjoy the western
>> way of live. What moral ground do you have to see others as less of an
>> African than you are? Below is the Economist Magazine's article on Kegame
>> and Rwanda. In fact the article acknowledge the level of financial
>> discipline the government of Kegame is instituting, yet the other facts
>> cannot be left unspoken about because one is doing something’s right and
>> other major wrongs. We should delineate cheap emotion from serious issues
>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.economist.com/world/middle-east/displaystory.cfm?story_id=15622375
>>
>>
>> Progress and repression in Rwanda
>> Divisionists beware President Paul Kagame has improved people’s lives at
>> the expense of freedom
>>
>> Mar 4th 2010 | NAIROBI | From *The Economist* print edition
>> Kagame, progressive and repressive
>>
>> THE government of Rwanda is doing a lot of things right. It is pretty open
>> in its handling of aid money. Most foreign governments and charities are so
>> impressed by its detailed plans and apparent lack of corruption that they
>> are funnelling more of their aid directly through Rwanda’s government.
>> President Paul Kagame says he expects direct budget support to rise by a
>> quarter this year, to $519m.
>>
>> The country has recovered valiantly from its year zero in 1994, when
>> 800,000 Tutsis and moderate Hutus were slaughtered. Its centralised state is
>> leading the way in economic and technological reform in the region. It is
>> improving the country’s infrastructure, education and farming, and seeks to
>> preserve its ecology. It pushes equality for women, who comprise half the
>> government and parliament.
>>
>> On the diplomatic front, Mr Kagame has been equally successful. He has
>> sent troops to help keep the peace in Sudan’s Darfur province and elsewhere.
>> He has stood up to mighty France, blaming it, as the region’s then most
>> influential Western power, for failing to prevent the genocide. And last
>> month the French president, Nicolas Sarkozy, came to Rwanda and offered
>> something close to an apology. France, he said, had committed “grave errors
>> of judgment” before, during, and after the genocide. Questions linger about
>> the role of French special forces during the killing, as well as the fate of
>> Hutus living in France whom Rwanda wants extradited on suspicion of
>> involvement in the genocide.
>>
>> France, for its part, has not dropped charges against some members of Mr
>> Kagame’s government who are alleged to have ordered the shooting down of a
>> French aircraft carrying Rwanda’s then president, Juvénal Habyarimana, a
>> Hutu; that action triggered the genocide. Yet both countries now appear more
>> at ease with each other. Days after Mr Sarkozy’s visit, Mr Habyarimana’s
>> widow, Agathe, was arrested near Paris (and then freed on bail) for
>> questioning over her alleged role in the genocide. French businessmen came
>> in Mr Sarkozy’s slipstream, eyeing minerals and timber in neighbouring
>> Congo, for which Rwanda is a conduit. “There is no doubt this is a
>> reconciliation,” says a Rwandan government figure.
>>
>> Yet awkward question-marks hang over Mr Kagame and his ruling Rwandan
>> Patriotic Front. The president’s detractors say his party has not owned up
>> to killing thousands of civilians immediately after the genocide or to
>> responsibility for causing much bloodshed in Congo, which it invaded in
>> order to hunt down the *génocidaires* who had fled there. The Congolese
>> government, it may be noted, has co-operated with the Rwandans in their more
>> recent incursions into Congo.
>>
>> Mr Kagame and his government are stifling political and press freedom in
>> advance of a presidential election due in August. He is almost certain to
>> win but evidently he is determined to secure a big majority to implement his
>> “one Rwanda” policies. Opposition parties have been forbidden to “use words
>> or facts that defame other politicians”. In practice, the government can
>> label any criticism against it as “divisionism”, which entitles it to lock
>> up the offenders. Members of the opposition say they are spied on and
>> bullied.
>>
>> It is unclear whether the government will let the Democratic Green Party,
>> a feisty new opposition group, be registered. If not, the Greens say they
>> will back another lot, the Socialist Party-Imberakuri, which should be able
>> to run a presidential candidate. The head of a third opposition party, the
>> United Democratic Forces-Inkingi, Victoire Ingabire, says she has been
>> vilified since returning from exile in January. The government, she says,
>> has encouraged people to assault her, accusing her of being a *
>> génocidaire*. This week a former military intelligence chief, Kayumba
>> Nyamwasa, who was reported to have joined the Greens, fled Rwanda and is
>> said to be claiming asylum in South Africa. The government says he is wanted
>> on criminal charges—presumably divisionism.
>>
>> End.
>>
>> Going back to our own dictators corridors, What is it that his supporter
>> are fuming against us about? They are saying, the man is a dictator of
>> development and that he is fighting against corruption. He has given women
>> more power and rights. His Vice-President is a woman. At some point in his
>> government, there were more women in his government as Ministers than the
>> previous administration. All that the gentleman is promoting Kegame for,
>> Yahya Jammeh was once hail with those same things.
>>
>> Should there be any reason for the cubing of civil rights and plurality of
>> views?
>>
>> Is Kegame himself innocent of pumping tribal issues in politics? In fact,
>> Kegame's men in the army including the high ranking female officer play the
>> card more than many others. Check their own Google images Mr Gentleman. I
>> have seen images of the Rwandan army's latest incursion of Congo, the
>> close senior officers bragging about their prejudicial influences. These
>> things aren’t as simple as the gentleman is making it out to be.
>>
>> Nothing should compromise tolerant co-existence, and the opposition views
>> is a key part to ensuring the population is represented at all levels.
>> Kegame's propaganda alone shouldn't be listened to at the expense of others.
>> He should be commended for lots of things, but he also needs to understand
>> that framing words against his opponent is not healthy for the future
>> stability of the country. Some of us are less of a Pan-African, however, we
>> know the working of a genuine democracy. Advocates of Europeanism live in
>> Europe. let our Pan-African folks migrate to Africa, instead of crying wolf
>> in western towns and cities.
>>
>> Let not your bias of folks make you blind to their views. Stop been haste
>> over public issues. Take a deep breath and read the material before jumping
>> to conclusion.
>>
>> LJ, thanks for your sober and intelligent analysis always. Long may we
>> have many non-partisan like you. Speaking the facts regardless of who it
>> come from. Saddly, folks here seems to look at names, party afilliation,
>> some ignoble little gangs before saying anything   tangible.      You have
>> shown to be above such petty mantra.
>>
>> Suntou
>>
>> Suntou
>>
>>
>>
>>    On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 9:28 PM, Lamin Darbo <
>> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>>   Mboge
>>>
>>> You are absolutely right that "Four men accused of taking part in the
>>> 1994 Rwandan genocide win their High Court battle against extradition" was
>>> "strictly premised on the significance of the Legal precedence it sets for
>>> 'fugitives' claiming to be escaping persecution". Specifically, I was
>>> thinking about Justice Safiatou Njie (Justice Njie) and whether The Gambia
>>> Government is likely to succeed in having her extradited by the UK.
>>>
>>> Although her alleged crimes are not political, the whole mechanism of
>>> Gambian justice is heavily entangled in political calculations. She is not
>>> likely to get a fair trial, and as a requirement of Article 6 of the
>>> European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR), now statutorily incorporated
>>> into UK law by the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998), her chance of eluding
>>> extradition is looking good.
>>>
>>> Even as the Rwandan decision is a brilliant exemplification of the rule
>>> of law, I have to agree with you that the High Court decision was a
>>> difficult one on moral grounds. I am unsure why Rwanda did not seek their
>>> extradition for onward delivery to the International Criminal Tribunal
>>> Rwanda (ICTR), based in the Tanzanian city of Arusha.
>>>
>>> For Rwanda, it should not matter where these alleged criminals are
>>> prosecuted. The evidence is suggestive of some involvement by all four in
>>> the '94 genocide. In that case, common sense would dictate that they be
>>> prosecuted for their alleged crimes, and where found legally culpable,
>>> adequately punished.
>>>
>>> Undoubtedly, the political arm of government was keen to have them
>>> extradited, but the Judiciary blocked that wish on the explicit command of
>>> both European, and UK law.
>>> Stated differently, the High Court probably hated the outcome, but there
>>> was a clear obligation to implement the law as it is. You are right that
>>> under other circumstances, these laws can work quite well for "genuine
>>> asylum seekers". This particular decision was nevertheless quite agonising.
>>>
>>> As to Kagame, I defer to your expertise on the man, and his vision. What
>>> he must do, and this sooner than he may prefer, is to create an environment
>>> that allows his vision to incrementally mature even as he himself no longer
>>> leads Rwanda. No one person can fully develop a country,  and in my view,
>>> this means that every African leader, and, or, ruler, must come to terms
>>> with his/her own mortality. Only then will a mighty continent actualise its
>>> great potential by making use of the major part of the talent at its
>>> disposal.
>>>
>>> Many thanks for a fine response, and advocacy.
>>>
>>> Do you think the Gambia's extradition request regarding Justice Njie
>>> should succeed?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> LJDarbo
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --- On *Sun, 21/3/10, Modou Mboge <[log in to unmask]>* wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Modou Mboge <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Subject: Re: Fw: BBC E-mail: Rwanda accused win UK court case - PRECEDENT
>>> FOR FORMER HIGH COURT JUDGE SAFIATOU NJIE?
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Date: Sunday, 21 March, 2010, 17:38
>>>
>>>
>>>  LJD,
>>>
>>> I guess your sharing the judgement on the Rwandans by the High Court of
>>> the UK was strictly premised on the significance of the Legal precedence it
>>> sets for 'fugitives' claiming to be escaping persecution. I hope it is not
>>> presumptuous of me that you had in mind the Gambian female judicial employee
>>> currently in the UK apparently running away from Gambian justice *a la
>>> Jammeh when you shared the ruling.*   I assume that it is no rocket
>>> science that this ruling will provide protection for the corrupt criminals,
>>> *genocidaires and their apologists* from being brought to justice where
>>> it matters *ie* where their alleged crimes were committed.
>>>
>>> It seems the so-called High Court Judges are more concerned with the
>>> human rights of  vile *genocidaires* than those genuine asylum seekers
>>> whose fear of being killed and tortured in their homeland is consistently
>>> ignored and questioned  and in some instances ridiculed by Western media
>>> pandering to the right-wing politics of the *"other*" coming *to take
>>> our jobs and scrounging on our generous welfare systems.  *Im no lawyer
>>> but i hope this ruling also can be useful to genuine asylum seekers.
>>>
>>>
>>> Reading a response to the article you shared by our *"descerner extraordinaire
>>> on this forum" *comparing our criminal outfit headed by a deranged
>>> buffoon in the person of SHEPAD Jammeh gave me zits as well as being
>>> squirmish for a while.
>>>
>>> The realities of Gambia and Rwanda are markedly different.   Kagame and
>>> Jammeh are poles apart.  Kagame is a smart and  patriotic leader, a
>>> visionary engaged in healing a traumatized people, one fighting a good fight
>>> in ushering in a new nation based on functioning institutions. The howling
>>> on this *divisionism by the Economist *is in my view an
>>> irrelevant unworthy distraction. Kagame should take no advise or lecturing
>>> from a rabidly anti-African magazine that once ran a feature cover story by
>>> Richard Dowden on Africa*: The Hopeless Continent.  *It may be true that
>>> many an African country is marred by hunger, conflict and strife yet i have
>>> no doubt that if anything the African peoples are mostly hopeful and
>>> optimistic  about the future.  This may be sometimes wrongly attributed to
>>> fatalism.
>>>
>>>  Of course there still remains a lot to be done in terms of democracy and
>>> human rights in Rwanda but one must acknowledge the giant strides already
>>> achieved in relation to these ideals.  It is work in progress that is being
>>> managed very well under extremely difficult circumstances.*  Rwanda
>>> under Kagame boast one of the most enlightened gender equality legislatures
>>> in the world.*  And this goes beyond just symbolic balancing of the
>>> sexes in terms of representation (given that 33% of the
>>> Rwandan Parliament is female)  in politics. Women compete and participate in
>>> all sectors of Rwanda society.  There is evidence of substantive and
>>> particapatory democracy in everyday life of the ordinary Rwandan. The
>>> economy in Rwanda is booming, civil society is being built and their
>>> advocacy left, right and centre permeates in and at all levels of
>>> society. Under Kagame's Rwanda a state by all standards that failed, has
>>> emerged way ahead of many African countries in terms of health care access
>>> to its denizens.  There is national health insurance for virtually all
>>> Rwandans.  With Rwanda now on the right path to development and substantive
>>> participatory democracy i join the hoard of admirers wishing the Kagame
>>> juggernaut to keep steaming ahead.  I do also hope that the juggernaut also
>>> destroys and annihilate all the negative forces trying to block
>>> it especially those coated in ethnicity.  Ethnicity is important but not to
>>> the detriment of building a prosperous Rwandan nation that concerns herself
>>> with providing peace, prosperity and progress  to its people.
>>>
>>> There exists a genuine concern by those trying to deny the *horrid
>>> genocide that took place in 1994.* Politicians such as Victoire Ingabire
>>> Umuhoza trying to play on ethnic sentiments must be reigned in.  This does
>>> not mean that people should be denied the right to associate with the ethnic
>>> skirt they want to wear as long as it is not to villify or create
>>> schisms between and among their brethren and sisters.  Afterall the Tutsi
>>> and Hutu are from the same family of Bantu-speaking peoples.  But if not
>>> for a sad historical constructionism perpetrated by colonialists based
>>> on banal concepts such as the *Hamitic Hypothesis , the Tutsi-Hutu *dichotomous
>>> relationship might have been avoided*.  *I shall not suffer the esteem
>>> lot of this forum on the nitty-gritty of this racist hypothesis which helped
>>> in the pogroms of the Tutusis in 1959 and the genocide of 1994.
>>>
>>>
>>>  We have seen the shenanigans of France and some other northern
>>> governments trying to stifle the progress and development of Rwanda since
>>> the RPF came into power.  I will have Kagame any day as my leader compared
>>> to the rogues we have splattered across our wounded continent irresponsibly
>>> abusing the noble ideals of democracy and human rights.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Mboge
>>>
>>> **
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 7:56 AM, suntou touray <[log in to unmask]<[log in to unmask]" target="_blank">http:[log in to unmask]>
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> LJ, reading the economies Magazine edition of last week, i can see
>>>> similar tactics in the arena of suppression of opposition views in Rwanda to
>>>> that our own mad man. Kegame's government invented a dangerous term *
>>>> 'divisionist'.* This term is label against opponents of the government
>>>> with the country's sad past. The genocidal past was trigger by tribal
>>>> sentiment, hence the divisionist concept.
>>>> It is interesting how our guys invent this sinister strategies to
>>>> suppress alternative views. Key members of the opposition are regularly
>>>> accused of being guilty of genocide, a tack one is unable to free
>>>> himself from.
>>>> Suntou
>>>>
>>>>   On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Lamin Darbo <
>>>> [log in to unmask]<[log in to unmask]" target="_blank">http:[log in to unmask]>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --- On *Fri, 19/3/10, LJD <[log in to unmask]<[log in to unmask]" target="_blank">http:[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> >* wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> From: LJD <[log in to unmask]<[log in to unmask]" target="_blank">http:[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> >
>>>>> Subject: BBC E-mail: Rwanda accused win UK court case
>>>>> To: [log in to unmask]<[log in to unmask]" target="_blank">http:[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> Date: Friday, 19 March, 2010, 0:08
>>>>>
>>>>> LJD saw this story on the BBC News website and thought you
>>>>> should see it.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ** Rwanda accused win UK court case **
>>>>> Four men accused of taking part in the 1994 Rwandan genocide win their
>>>>> High Court battle against extradition
>>>>> < http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/em/fr/-/1/hi/uk/7989534.stm >
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ** BBC Daily E-mail **
>>>>> Choose the news and sport headlines you want - when you want them, all
>>>>> in one daily e-mail
>>>>> < http://www.bbc.co.uk/email >
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ** Disclaimer **
>>>>> The BBC is not responsible for the content of this e-mail, and anything
>>>>> written in this e-mail does not necessarily reflect the BBC's views or
>>>>> opinions. Please note that neither the e-mail address nor name of the sender
>>>>> have been verified.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you do not wish to receive such e-mails in the future or want to
>>>>> know more about the BBC's Email a Friend service, please read our frequently
>>>>> asked questions. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/help/4162471.stm
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ To
>>>>> unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web
>>>>> interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
>>>>> To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to:
>>>>> http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact
>>>>> the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
>>>>> [log in to unmask]<[log in to unmask]" target="_blank">http:[log in to unmask]>¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ To
>>>> unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web
>>>> interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
>>>> To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to:
>>>> http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact
>>>> the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
>>>> [log in to unmask]<[log in to unmask]" target="_blank">http:[log in to unmask]>¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
>>>>
>>>
>>> ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ To
>>> unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web
>>> interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
>>> To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to:
>>> http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact
>>> the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
>>> [log in to unmask]<[log in to unmask]" target="_blank">http:[log in to unmask]>¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
>>>
>>>
>>> ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ To
>>> unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web
>>> interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
>>>
>>> To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to:
>>> http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact
>>> the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
>>> [log in to unmask]¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
>>>
>>
>> ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ To
>> unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web
>> interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
>>
>> To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to:
>> http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact the
>> List Management, please send an e-mail to:
>> [log in to unmask]¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
>>
>
> ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤ To
> unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web
> interface at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
>
> To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to:
> http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l To contact the
> List Management, please send an e-mail to:
> [log in to unmask]¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
>


¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html

To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤