GAMBIA-L Archives

The Gambia and Related Issues Mailing List

GAMBIA-L@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Khaleel Jameel <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The Gambia and Related Issues Mailing List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 6 Aug 2013 12:39:12 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 kB) , text/html (18 kB)
Sorry Suntou, I spelled your name wrong earlier.
 
Khaleel
 
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 12:38:15 -0400
From: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [G_L] Khaleel and co under attack: Gambian Drs and PhD holders not the solution then: Who is David Bansama
To: [log in to unmask]







Thanks Sountou for sharing yet another piece from David.  I know David is reading, below is my response:


David,


Thanks for taking the time out whether to elaborate more on
your points or to repeat/clarify points previously made that I obviously missed.
I still stand by what my interpretation of your article was and I am certain
you will do the same as well. Words have meanings and meanings can be flexible at
times depending on who is reading or writing. To me, your list associated those
individuals to a high degree of responsibility or lack of to our national
development. While you, the readers and I may have some minor differences on
use of words, concept and interpretation which won’t go away, I will like to
focus on what we agree on if that’s ok with you.  

I think we are saying the same thing here for the most part
David. We both don’t expect the PHD/DRs to be the agent of change in our country;
we both agree that given their intellectual capacity, they should play a role
worthy of emulation in this time of despair. We also agree that the
responsibility of our nation building rests in the hands of many not few.  These are pretty significant things we agree
on and I pray that our deeds match our words for the most rather than the few
who will shoulder this crusade to lead our nation in the near future. I also
pray for all of us to be steadfast, humble, respect one another and reason well
with each other. I look forward to reading more from you. Have a blessed day
and happy eid in advance.



Khaleel


 
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 12:15:29 +0100
From: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [G_L] Khaleel and co under attack: Gambian Drs and PhD holders not the solution then: Who is David Bansama
To: [log in to unmask]



Gambian intellectuals Are Not Agents of Change

Reads :274


OURS IS A CRUSADE TO CLEANSE

OUR SOCIETY OF THESE PARASITES

 
By David Bansama

“David is over stretching their role……. The expectation that less than one percent of our population should shoulder the responsibility to lead and effect change because they attained the highest level of education is not real” – Says Khaleel Jameel on Gambia L

When I wrote my piece last week, I knew (and expected) it would generate a lot of discourse because it is not the norm (to talk in less favourable terms about people held in reverence) in our milieu. What I did not expect, however, was an attempt (whether by design or default) to infer meanings into my piece which I have not inferred. Thank God, I am still alive, I will go back to re-iterate my position.

Learning from history, I have never expected the Gambian Ph. Ds (or intellectuals) to be the agents of change in our country (even though they can) and I have never expected them to “shoulder the responsibility”. We learnt from history that in societies where change was effected, it was usually the common man who took the lead. For instance, the popular French Revolution was led by the common man; the American war of Independence was not led by the Ph.Ds; the Russian revolt against the Czars was led by the common man; coming home, one of the Fathers of Gambia’s Independence, Sir Dawda Jawara; was first identified and chosen by the common man to represent them. Even at that, he hesitated and contemplated possible financial losses especially as a family man (stated by Sir Dawda in his own book). Some of the members that attended the Marlborough Conference to discuss Gambia’s independence were barely literate. In recent times, the change that Brazil, one of the emerging markets (BRICS), is experiencing was initiated by Lula Da Silva who is not a Ph.D but a common Trade Unionist from the masses; Hugo Chavez (despite Western vilification) brought immense changes to his country for the common man and he did it without attaining a Ph.D. The man that everybody loves (Nelson Mandela) changed the course of history in South Africa without attaining a Ph. D. Likewise, all the Gambian Liberation Movements (as numerous as they are) were not initiated by Gambian Ph.Ds. Please correct me if I am wrong. These “intellectuals” are usually the comfortable lot who like lording it over the rest after the battle had been fought and won. Let me just give a casual example here: isn’t it interesting to see on Maafanta, the FB exchanges between our former Honourable Foreign Minister, Sidi Sanneh, who did not attend the events in Raleigh and Stockholm but wants quick results (in terms of reports) and is so brazen about it? He even trivializes the matter rather unwittingly (just like he did with Yahya Jammeh’s underpants) by zooming on the latest gadgets brought to the meetings, interestingly putting it in this rather de-meaning fashion “…I did not attend either of the meetings but I was told about the fancy gadgets”.Isn’t this cheap and petty for Sidi himself? Where were his brain and conscience at the time of penning this particular line? When I read it, I was tempted to ask: Was it gadgets that concerned you most about the meetings or the substance? How trivial and petty could one be?

Having said the above, what I (and the majority of the poverty-stricken Gambians) do not, however, expect from our Ph.Ds and other “intellectuals” is the aiding and abetting of the current Gambian dictatorship in brutalising our people because of their own selfish interest. By the way, do you know there are some of these “intellectuals” who still clandestinely work with the Dictatorship in Banjul even after Jammeh had shown them the way out in the most cavalier manner?  We have full dossiers on most of them and, at the opportune time, will share it with the rest of our compatriots to buttress our point on how cheap but dangerous some of our “intellectuals” can be. It is not a threat. Ours is a crusade in which we are determined to cleanse our society of these parasites. All of the people I mentioned in my write-up joined the regime after Gambians have seen enough PHYSICAL EVIDENCE OF JAMMEH’s BRUTALITY. What more lessons did they need to understand that Jammeh is deranged and derailed, and therefore did not mean well for our people? With their supposed exposure and level of “education”, they ought to have known better. This was the thrust of my message and I thought it was crystal clear to even the most casual reader.

Now flipping the debate in Khaleel’s way, even if we assumed “less than one percent of our population should shoulder the responsibility to lead and effect change because they attained the highest level of education”, this cannot still be considered an “over-stretching” of their role, especially if we take education as a means to better our societies. This is aptly conveyed to you at the point of getting your degrees for it is said you have been found “worthy in learning and character” to be conferred a Bachelors, Masters or a Ph.D. as the case may be. I believe, 50 Gambian PH.Ds (less than one percent of the Gambian population but with the right mindset and strength of character) selflessly working together, can bring immense benefit to our people. It is all about honesty, principles and patriotism (not the narrow and twisted definition as coined by our Professor in Banjul).

With regards to the rest of what Khaleel said and emphasised “Let’s not forget that these PHD/Doctorate holders are Gambians, they are packed with all flaws each and every Gambian of us has”, I have already belaboured on this fact in both my opening and concluding paragraphs, so I need not repeat that. I would just refer you to these paragraphs to confirm for yourself what I have already said.

I believe we should all be held accountable for our actions especially during these trying times.

 







Share this:







-- 
www.suntoumana.blogspot.com 

¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html

To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
                                        

¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html

To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
                                          

¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html

To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤

ATOM RSS1 RSS2