Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 28 Apr 2000 12:28:46 EDT |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Great, The least we can do for our beloved children who were gunned down
in broad daylight, is to put these people on the spot and bring out their
inconsistencies. We must do our part to get to the bottom of this
warrantless massacre. Anything less on our part, will be uncivilized. We
must get rid of YAYA BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY. Am also in for using the
judicial process if that is what it would take. If it is also going to take
Colly, Jatta, etc. to get rid of him ....fine with me too.
>From: Pope Pope <[log in to unmask]>
>Reply-To: The Gambia and related-issues mailing list
><[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: TOMBONG PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THESE
>Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 11:58:31 EDT
>
>Tombong:
>
>Are you isinuating that the president's absence during the shootings clears
>him of any responsibility? The president has already told us that he was in
>full contact with his advisers etc. so he must have been fully aware of the
>situation back home. I dont think that the "shoot to kill" strategy that
>was
>adopted would have been carried out without the president's orders (using
>live bullets equals "shoot to kill" in my book). Besides even if he didnt
>give the order to shoot, he is still culpable since he is in charge of
>those
>who did or gave the order to shoot! If the orders didnt come from him then
>there was twas serious lack of leadership during that tragic incident!
>
>If all the killings had taken place on the same day then I can maybe (a big
>maybe) understand that maybe the orders didnt come from him, but some
>students were later killed in the provinces. Are you telling me that people
>were shot twice on different occasions and locations at different times,
>without the presidents orders or knowledge?
>
>It'd be a big mistake if the government underestimates people's resolve
>regarding the killings. Bottomline is we want whoever was responsible for
>this barbaric act to pay for it to the fullest extent of the law whether it
>is the president or someone else who works for him! But again what if the
>president is responsible, do you honestly think that he'd pay for it to the
>fullest extent of the law? :-)
>
>On the issue of those jailed having to go through a process, I respectively
>disagree. If an arrest is legal then, yes they'll have to go through due
>process but not when the arrest is illegal! An illegal arrest should simply
>not take place in the first place. If an arrest is known to be illegal then
>the person(s) should be freed immediately!
>
>Respectfully
>
>Pope
>
>________________________________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L
>Web interface at: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/gambia-l.html
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L
Web interface at: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/gambia-l.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|