Mr Drammeh,
Why I you still stalking me? Have I become that much important to you
that you keep butting in my conversations? I thought we had a peaceful
agreement in private to agree to disagree but disagree without resorting
personal vendetta. That was the sole reason I wrote to you in private
because I will entertain personal vendetta on this public forum, not my
forte. Since we both knew each others private e-mails, we can squash what-
ever we have in private without giving decent peopl on the L untimely
migraine. But little did I know you verbal ordeals to misunderstood what I
meant when I ask you what was up with the fussing and fighting. I even
went on to say if we can all get along despite the diferences we have. I
know i may not be able to change your perception but we must agree to dis-
agree respectfully. Seeing how far you were going with your argument and
vulgarity and threats you made towards me, forced me to engage you in
private. Don't get it twisted again, because just because we differ in
opinions doesn't mean I hate you. You said I wrote you in private telling
you how I like you because you are a person who doesn't give up easily? Mr
Draameh please read my e-mail again and try not to get it twisted. What I
was telling you is simply that a person who doesn't give easily is my kind
of guy and I was beginning to like you because of that. It was your
persistance that I was referring not you the fence-shitter. Get it? Mr
Drammeh, I have no idea what you're insuating again, but I am a married man
and I love my wife and daughter very much. You are giving me creeps here.
I also notice that you are still referring to me as Mr Make-A-Villain, well
equally, from now on I will refer you as 'Phi-A-Horana' which means a
hypocrite, sure you heard it before. See how it feels now. Anyone can be
an a**hole if they choose to engage in unconstructive debate. It's not how
bad you demoralize your opponent but how well you substantiate your
arguments. Yes, I did ignore your last posting and never read it, but when
I saw Soffie Ceesay or Saul Khan write something I usually value their
opinion and so I read it. I saw that they try to teach you the rudiments of
rational government and what obligations ordinary citizens ought to
profess. And even though you warned me to just be quiet, I had also warned
you that I will NOT be silenced nor demoralized by FENCE-SHITTERS because
the opinion of a fence-shitter simply doesn't entice me an iota. Since you
cannot engage me constructively, I decided to handle whatever beef you had
on me in private. Simply as that. I don't know! I don't hate you! And quite
frankly, I don't like you(i.e 'Phi-A-Horana' , the fence-shitter), KAPUT!
So you ride with your opinion and I ride with mine, but let that not fool
you to believe I will entertain personal vendetta in this public forum.Not
my forte, you dig? I may respect you as a gambian brother but not as a
fence-shitter. That is where we differ, my brother. I hope you have good
day because mine will. As the wollof saying goes 'Lu Wang-Ha Di-Doh Norr'.
Gotta go ! Gotta go! See ya! Eeeeeyyyyaaaaiiiiaaaahhhhoooooooo! It's had
being a Gambian!..........uuuuuhhhnnggh!...........lord have mercy!!!
Still not interested,
Mr Makaveli
PS: I swear this time that I will not be tempted again to respond to you
even if curse at my dog.(o-;)hehehe! But you never know, there are always
exceptions. And please take it easy before you give yourself a Cardiac
Arrest. Remember, I am not the enemy and neither are you. It's our DESPOTIC
REGIME my brother. Let's shift our energy toward that fight. Oops!I forget.
You're neutral. A fence-shitter. Ha! I must be thinking of someone else.Go
figure!
From: Harona S Drammeh <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: To Be Or Not To Be?
To: [log in to unmask]
Date: May 19, 2001
Ya Soffie: Your contribution is interesting. However, i'm not all too clear
about your position vis-a-vis my opinion as expressed earlier, perhaps you
will shed more light on it. The label fence-sitter was not of my own making
and i doubt Ous made it up too. It was given to us. I don't have a problem
with it. Do you?
My brother, Amadou, you probably have lost contact with your folks and
politics back home to argue that i'm neutral simply for want of keeping my
job. People have yelled their guts out in support of the President and the
APRC government, yet, they get fired in the most shameful way. If people who
openly support the APRC can be fired, what about some neutral,
"fence-shitting" person? Yours was a poor arguement, try again!
Koto Saul, you make me believe even further that oppressed people can also
have oppressive tendencies only if given the chance.
Kara: I thank you for your contribution, atleast it makes me feel there
still are people who understand what politics is all about. Once again, i
thank you.
Mr. Make-A-Villain Sarr: You are a very dishonest person. You wrote to me in
private earlier today, telling me how you like a person like me. That i'm
persistent and do not give-up. Only to turn around and start fighting me
again. What do you call this? It is worthy reminding you that your position
was to not read any of my posts. Yet, you did! See, it is all about honesty,
integrity and being a person of your word. You did not have to write to me
in private and on the public forum writing the opposite of what you send to
me privately. This is dishonesty. It must not be tolerated. Are you becoming
a fence-SHITTER?
Goodnite.
Harona.
Gambians Online " Designed With The Gambian People In Mind"
http://www.gambiansonline.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L
Web interface at: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/gambia-l.html
You may also send subscription requests to [log in to unmask]
if you have problems accessing the web interface and remember to write your full name and e-mail address.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
