Burning Issues <http://www.foroyaa.gm/modules/news/index.php?storytopic=5>
: Letter
To Daily Observer  By Publisher <http://www.foroyaa.gm/userinfo.php?uid=31> on
16-03-09 (148 reads) News by the same
author<http://www.foroyaa.gm/modules/news/newsbythisauthor.php?uid=31>

We publish a rejoinder by Sam Sarr below:

Re: Halifa Sallah faces plotting, spy charges
In your Weekend Observer edition of March 13-15 2009, you published an
article on page 10 with the caption, “Halifa Sallah faces plotting, spying
charges”.

In the article, the author wrote: “Halifa Sallah appeared in court on
Wednesday on charges of plotting against the government and spying, and was
immediately returned to jail as he could not post the D1 million bail he was
given.” The author further stated: “When the case came up for hearing,
Magistrate Kayode Olajubutu of the Brikama Magistrates Court told the main
accused person that he had been charged with spying, illegal assembly and
intended sedition.” These statements need clarification.

In the first place, Halifa Sallah is not charged with “plotting against the
Government”. In fact there was no conspiracy charge against him. This is the
first point to note.

He was also not charged with “illegal assembly,” which is not the same
offence as “control of procession”.

Furthermore, the Criminal Code Act does not know the offence of “intended
sedition”. What it knows is “seditious intention” which is defined in
section 51 of the Code.

For the benefit of the reader, Halifa Sallah is charged with the following
offences:
1) Spying: It is alleged that on March 7, 2009, at Makumbaya Village in the
Western Region, Halifa Sallah obtained confidential information which he
knew is directly or indirectly useful to an enemy.
2) Control of processions: The allegation is that on 7, March 2009, at
Makumbaya Village in the Western Region, he knowingly and unlawfully held a
procession without a licence issued by the Inspector General of Police.
3) Seditious intentions: It is alleged that on March 7, 2009, at Makumbaya,
in the Western Region, Halifa Sallah, with intent to bring hatred or
contempt or excite disaffection against the Government, unlawfully assembled
the people of Makumbaya Village in order to collect information that would
bring hatred, contempt or excite disaffection to the Government of The
Gambia.

Still on the issue of the charges, the author also claimed that Magistrate
Kayode told the defendant, Halifa Sallah, what the charges are. That is not
correct. As usual, it was the clerk who read out the charges one by one,
asking Halifa Sallah on each occasion to take a plea.

The author also referred to Halifa Sallah as the “main accused person”,
which gives the impression that there is more than one accused person. I am
of the opinion that the author did not witness the proceedings of March 7. I
will advise him as a fellow journalist to ensure that he/she gets his/her
reports from the courts and avoid hearsay. This will facilitate the accuracy
and impartiality of his/her reports.

On the issue of bail, the author said Halifa Sallah “could not post the D1
million bail he was given.” I don’t understand what the author is saying but
for the purpose of clarity, it is important to note that a bail bond is
simply an agreement to ensure that a defendant or a suspect makes
himself/herself available when required. The case of Bangally Kone and
others is a good example. When Bangally absconded, the surety (guarantor),
one Yankuba Fatty, has been ordered by the court to meet the condition of
the bail, that is, to pay D100,000, or be jailed for two years.

Hence being granted bail in the sum of D1 million simply means being set
free, provided a surety or some sureties agree to pay D1 million if the
defendant or suspect fails to appear, otherwise the surety or sureties will
be jailed. Clearly then the sum of D1 million does not have to be paid. This
is therefore not the reason for Halifa Sallah’s failure to meet the bail
condition.

The problem is that Halifa Sallah could not get sureties to sign the bail
bond. Apart from an Alkalo (village head) in the area, the Magistrate asked
for two other sureties who must be either ex-Inspector General of Police or
ex-Brigadier retired for at least eight years. Halifa knew that he could not
possibly meet these bail conditions. He was of the opinion that this
tantamount to denial of bail.

This is what led him to tell his sympathisers after the adjournment that
they should go home. He added: “I am ready to suffer for others not to
suffer, but what is going on must stop.”

Sam Sarr

¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html

To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤