PSYCHOAN Archives

Psychoanalysis

PSYCHOAN@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Fred Welfare <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Psychoanalysis <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 7 Jan 2001 14:46:20 EST
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (671 bytes) , text/html (1019 bytes)
In a message dated 1/7/01 1:53:32 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:


> My point
>    E=mc2 has been dangerous insofar psychoanalysts failed with their service
> to collective psychology - see Freud warning:
>

I am not convinced that E=mc2 is theorizing; it seems to me to be the
discovery of fact!  The theories which we form and the use to which they are
put, are certainly
distinct enterprises.  Therefore, theorizing or even the discovery of facts
cannot in itself be dangerous, though their use could. So I have to ask
again, why is theorizing dangerous?

Having read the Excerpts from Freud, I wonder whether Freud read Darwin's
Descent of Man or Durkheim's Elementary Forms.

Vunch


ATOM RSS1 RSS2